IP Library Granted Patent US 11,710,103
Granted Patent B2
US 11,710,103 · App. 16/086,120 · Granted Jul 25, 2023

Intrusion security panel with remote assistance through simulated user interface

Inventors: Anantha Krishnan (Hyderabad, IN); Michael Ramoutar (Westford, MA); Ramesh Babu (Hyderabad, IN); Prakash Bodla (Hyderabad, IN)
Assignee: Carrier Corporation
G06Q10/20G06F21/30G08B25/14H04L5/14
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 11,710,103
App. No.
16/086,120
Granted
Jul 25, 2023
Kind
B2
Abstract

A security system includes a security panel operable to communicate with a support site via a lightweight binary-based protocol to echo a security panel user interface with the support site. A method of communicating with a security system including communicating with a support site via a lightweight binary-based protocol to echo a security panel user interface at the support site.

Claims (28)

1. A security system, comprising:

a security panel operable to receive a request and to determine whether the request is a panel configuration change or is not a panel configuration change, and when the request is determined to not be a panel configuration change, the security panel is configured to communicate with a support site via a lightweight binary-based protocol, and to echo a security panel user interface at the support site after access by the support site is authorized on the security panel in order that support personnel at the support site see what is shown on the security panel user interface, wherein the security panel is operable to provide two-way voice communication between the security panel and the support site.

2. The system as recited in claim 1 , wherein access by the support site is manually authorized on the security panel.

3. The system as recited in claim 1 , further comprising authorizing access by the support site via authorization on the security panel itself.

4. A method of communicating with a security system, the method comprising:

receiving a request from a security panel of the security system;

determining whether the request is or is not a panel configuration change;

when the request is not a panel configuration change,

authorizing access for a support site on the security panel itself prior to echoing a security panel user interface at the support site;

communicating with the support site via a lightweight binary-based protocol;

echoing the security panel user interface at the support site in order that support personnel at the support site see what is shown on the security panel user interface, wherein the security panel is operable to provide two-way voice communication between the security panel and the support site; and

communicating between the security panel and the support site via the two-way voice communication, whereby the request can be addressed by the support personnel at the support site.

5. A method of communicating with a security system, the method comprising:

receiving a request from a security panel of the security system;

determining whether the request is or is not a panel configuration change;

when the request is not a panel configuration change,

authorizing access for a support site on a security panel itself;

echoing a security panel user interface at the support site in order that support personnel at the support site see what is shown on the security panel user interface; and

communicating with the support site via a lightweight binary-based protocol, wherein the security panel is operable to provide two-way voice communication between the security panel and the support site, wherein the lightweight binary-based protocol facilitates screen IDs, Event IDs, UI control IDs, and sensor state IDs, to be displayed in the client software that is a replica of the security panel wherein the data being exchanged between the security panel and the client software is controlled to a compact size via the lightweight binary-based protocol; and

communicating between the security panel and the support site via the two-way voice communication.

6. The system as recited in claim 1 , wherein the lightweight binary-based protocol facilitates screen IDs, Event IDs, UI control IDs, and sensor state IDs, to be displayed in the client software that is a replica of the security panel wherein the data being exchanged between the security panel and the client software is controlled to a compact size via the lightweight binary-based protocol.

7. The method as recited in claim 4 , wherein the lightweight binary-based protocol facilitates screen IDs, Event IDs, UI control IDs, and sensor state IDs, to be displayed in the client software that is a replica of the security panel wherein the data being exchanged between the security panel and the client software is controlled to a compact size via the lightweight binary-based protocol.

8. The system as recited in claim 1 , wherein, the security panel is operable, when the request is determined to be a panel configuration change, to connect a user of the user interface with downloader software configured to make the panel configuration change.

9. The method as recited in claim 4 , wherein, when the request is determined to be a panel configuration change, connecting a user of the user interface with downloader software configured to make the panel configuration change.

10. The method as recited in claim 5 , wherein, when the request is determined to be a panel configuration change, connecting a user of the user interface with downloader software configured to make the panel configuration change.

11. The system as recited in claim 1 , wherein data being exchanged between the security panel and the support station is controlled to a compact size by the binary protocol that deals mainly with IDs instead of entire screen data.

12. The method as recited in claim 4 , wherein data being exchanged between the security panel and the support station is controlled to a compact size by the binary protocol that deals mainly with IDs instead of entire screen data.

13. The method as recited in claim 5 , wherein data being exchanged between the security panel and the support station is controlled to a compact size by the binary protocol that deals mainly with IDs instead of entire screen data.

Assignments (1)
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Sep 10, 2025
From: CARRIER CORPORATION; CARRIER GLOBAL CORPORATION; CARRIER FIRE & SECURITY EMEA; CARRIER FIRE & SECURITY, LLC; CARRIER CANADA CORPORATION; CLIMATE, CONTROLS & SECURITY ARGENTINA S.A.; KIDDE IP HOLDINGS , INC.; KIDDE LTD.; KIDDE PRODUCTS LTD.; CARRIER TRANSICOLD AUSTRIA GMBH; CARRIER TRANSICOLD FRANCE SCS
To: KIDDE FIRE PROTECTION, LLC
Reel/Frame 072830/0760 →
Continuity (2)
Provisional Application 62310960 · Mar 21, 2016
Related Publication 20200311693A1 · Oct 1, 2020