IP Library Granted Patent US 10,746,120
Granted Patent B2
US 10,746,120 · App. 16/094,273 · Granted Aug 18, 2020

Diesel common-rail piezo-operated servo injector

View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 10,746,120
App. No.
16/094,273
Granted
Aug 18, 2020
Kind
B2
Abstract

Various embodiments may include a method for operating a diesel-common-rail piezo-operated servo injector comprising: partially charging the piezo-actuator from a non-charged state at 0 V (method a); partially discharging the piezo-actuator from an already charged state to a remaining limited charge (method b); measuring the piezo-voltage with both methods and comparing the results; when the comparison demonstrates correspondence within a predefined threshold, using method b in ranges in which method a cannot be carried out; and when the comparison does not demonstrate correspondence within the predefined threshold, using method a without using method b.

Claims (22)

1. A method for operating a diesel-common-rail piezo-operated servo injector in which a piezo-actuator opens and closes a nozzle needle by means of a servo valve, the method comprising:

partially charging the piezo-actuator from a non-charged state at 0 V (method a);

partially discharging the piezo-actuator from an already charged state to a remaining limited charge (method b);

measuring the piezo-voltage with both methods and comparing the results;

determining a voltage for the piezo-actuator for each operating point so that the piezo-actuator applies a force necessary for contact with the servo valve without influencing the injection process itself by opening the servo valve;

when the comparison demonstrates correspondence within a predefined threshold, using method b in ranges in which method a cannot be carried out; and

when the comparison does not demonstrate correspondence within the predefined threshold, using method a without using method b.

2. The method as claimed in claim 1 , further comprising switching to and fro between method a and method b during a specific injection process throughout one engine cycle.

3. The method as claimed in claim 1 , further comprising measuring the force during a specific main injection.

4. The method as claimed in claim 1 , further comprising measuring the force during times at which no large change of the operating point takes place.

5. The method as claimed in claim 1 , further comprising carrying out the partial discharging of the piezo-actuator (method b) starting from a charged state of said piezo-actuator associated with an actual injection.

6. The method as claimed in claim 1 , further comprising executing the partial charging (method a) after complete discharging of the piezo-actuator.

7. A motor vehicle comprising:

a combustion chamber;

a diesel-common-rail piezo-operated servo injector operating to inject fuel into the combustion chamber; and

a control unit programmed to:

partially charge the piezo-actuator from a non-charged state at 0 V (method a);

partially discharge the piezo-actuator from an already charged state to a remaining limited charge (method b);

measure the piezo-voltage with both methods and comparing the results;

determine a voltage for the piezo-actuator for each operating point so that the piezo-actuator applies a force necessary for contact with the servo valve without influencing the injection process itself by opening the servo valve;

when the comparison demonstrates correspondence within a predefined threshold, use method b in ranges in which method a cannot be carried out; and

when the comparison does not demonstrate correspondence within the predefined threshold, use method a without using method b.

Assignments (2)
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Jul 28, 2020
From: CONTINENTAL AUTOMOTIVE GMBH
To: VITESCO TECHNOLOGIES GMBH
Reel/Frame 053335/0887 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Oct 17, 2018
From: DIAN, VINCENT; SCHEID, MATTHIAS, DR.
To: CONTINENTAL AUTOMOTIVE GMBH
Reel/Frame 047196/0409 →