IP Library Granted Patent US 10,865,435
Granted Patent B2
US 10,865,435 · App. 16/094,864 · Granted Dec 15, 2020

Method of screening antibacterial compounds as inhibitor of Mfd

Inventors: Nalini Rama Rao (Buc, FR); Didier Rognan (Bernardswiller, FR); Didier Lereclus (Oulins, FR)
Assignees: INSTITUT NATIONAL DE RECHERCHE POUR L'AGRICULTURE; CENTRE NATIONAL DE LA RECHERCHE SCIENTIFIQUE; UNIVERSITE DE STRASBOURG
C12Q1/18G16B35/20
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 10,865,435
App. No.
16/094,864
Granted
Dec 15, 2020
Kind
B2
Abstract

Embodiments of the present disclosure relate to methods of screening and optionally designing compounds as inhibitors of Mfd (Mutation Frequency Decline), such compounds being useful for the treatment of bacterial infections. Embodiments of the methods include culturing pathogenic bacteria expressing functional Mfd with various concentrations of 1 mM or less, incubating the cultures with and without nitric oxide stress conditions, evaluating bacterial survival in each of the cultures, and calculating the concentration of the molecule required to decrease by 50% the survival rate of the bacteria (IC50) by comparing the cfu of the untreated cultures and cultures following nitric oxide stress.

Claims (16)

1. An in vitro method of screening an antibacterial molecule that inhibits mutation frequency decline (Mfd peptide) activity comprising the steps of:

(a) preparing several pairs of cultures of a pathogenic bacteria expressing a functional Mfd in culture media containing different concentrations of said molecule to be tested; wherein said concentrations of molecule to be tested are less than or equal to 1 mM;

(b) incubating one of each pair of cultures in nitric oxide stress conditions obtained by addition of NO donors in said culture media, leaving the other culture of each pair untreated;

(c) evaluating the bacterial survival in each of the cultures;

(d) calculating the concentration of the molecule to be tested required to decrease by 50% the survival rate of the bacteria (IC50) by comparing the cfu of the culture with the molecule to be tested in two conditions: untreated and following nitric oxide stress;

(d2) selecting the molecule showing an IC50 less or equal to 200 μM;

(e) incubating the Mfd peptide with the molecule identified as a Mfd inhibitor;

(f) determining whether or not the ATPase activity of Mfd is reduced relative to the activity of a Mfd that has not been contacted with said molecule.

2. The in vitro method of screening an antibacterial molecule according to claim 1 , wherein said pathogenic bacteria is a Gram-positive or a Gram-negative human pathogenic bacteria.

3. The in vitro method of screening an antibacterial molecule according to claim 1 , wherein said nitric oxide stress is artificially produced in vitro by addition of NO donors at concentration between 0.1 and 2 mM.

4. The in vitro method of screening an antibacterial molecule according to claim 1 , wherein the evaluation of the bacterial survival of step (c) is performed by plating on agar plates the harvested bacteria obtained after incubation of step (b), by flow cytometry, or by using a live and dead kit.

5. The in vitro method of screening an antibacterial molecule that inhibits the Mfd activity according to claim 1 , comprising additional steps prior to said step (a) consisting of in silico screening for potential Mfd inhibitors including:

(a1) generating using a homology modelling program to generate a three-dimensional model of the ATP-binding domain of Mfd using three-dimensional atomic coordinates of the ATP-binding domain of Mfd;

(a2) screening a library of physically-available small molecules for compounds predicted to occupy the ATP-binding site by a docking computational method, a pharmacophore search computational method, a de novo design method, or an active site comparison method; and

(a3) selecting virtual hits for experimental validation according to a docking score, a pharmacophore fitness value, a predicted binding free energy, or an active site similarity score.

6. The in vitro method of screening an antibacterial molecule according to claim 2 , wherein the human pathogenic bacteria is selected from Bacillus cereus group members, Shigella, Salmonella, Clostridium, Staphylococcus, Klebsiella, E. coli, Neisseria, Yersinia, Listeria, Streptococcus, Mycobacterium, Clamydia and Helicobacter species.

Assignments (3)
CORRECTIVE ASSIGNMENT TO CORRECT THE RECEIVING PARTY DATA PREVIOUSLY RECORDED ON REEL 052469 FRAME 0167. ASSIGNOR(S) HEREBY CONFIRMS THE CHANGE OF NAME. Recorded Apr 28, 2020
From: INSTITUT NATIONAL DE LA RECHERCHE AGRONOMIQUE (INRA)
To: INSTITUT NATIONAL DE RECHERCHE POUR L'AGRICULTURE, L'ALIMENTATION ET L'ENVIRONNEMENT
Reel/Frame 052510/0160 →
CHANGE OF NAME Recorded Apr 22, 2020
From: INSTITUT NATIONAL DE LA RECHERCHE AGRONOMIQUE (INRA)
To: INSTITUT NATIONAL DE RECHERCHE POUR L'AGRICULTURE, L'ALIMENTATION ET L'ENVIRONNEMENT (INRAE)
Reel/Frame 052469/0167 →
NUNC PRO TUNC ASSIGNMENT Recorded Nov 8, 2018
From: RAMA RAO, NALINI; ROGNAN, DIDIER; LERECLUS, DIDIER
To: INSTITUT NATIONAL DE LA RECHERCHE AGRONOMIQUE; CENTRE NATIONAL DE LA RECHERCHE SCIENTIFIQUE; UNIVERSITE DE STRASBOURG
Reel/Frame 047484/0614 →