SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR MULTILEVEL ANONYMOUS TRANSACTION COMPLIANCE EVALUATION
Systems and methods for transaction compliance evaluation are disclosed. Embodiments can provide rating based on the likelihood of non-compliant transactions at store sites and markets. Embodiments can gather transaction data from retail sites across a region and provide ratings based on a ratio of untraceable transactions above a value threshold. A scaled value is calculated for each transaction based on received market weighting factors and the monetary value of the transaction. The value threshold is selected based on a received cutoff percentage parameter. Site and market ratings are determined based on the number of transactions at each site above or below the value threshold.
1 . A system for dynamically determining a monetary value threshold for evaluating compliance of untraceable transactions at retail sites within a region, the system comprising:
one or more transaction data providers, remote from and operably coupled to a plurality of transaction processing systems to receive transaction data of a plurality of untraceable transactions within the region from the transaction processing systems, and configured to provide the monetary value of each of the plurality of untraceable transactions;
a transaction remodeler configured to:
receive one or more market weighting factors, and
determine a plurality of scaled values each based on the monetary value of one of the plurality of untraceable transactions and the one or more market weighting factors;
a threshold calculator configured to:
receive a cutoff percentage parameter, and
store a value threshold for the region such that a percentage of transactions within the region with a scaled value below the value threshold is equal to the cutoff percentage parameter; and
a site rater configured to:
determine a rating for a retail site within the region based on a ratio of a number of untraceable transactions with a scaled value above the value threshold to a number of untraceable transactions with a scaled value below the value threshold, and
store the rating in a rating data store such that the rating can be retrieved based on an identifier of the retail site.
2 . The system of claim 1 , wherein the rating is selected from the group consisting of: high, medium, and low.
3 . The system of claim 2 , wherein the rating is determined to be low if the ratio is equal to or less than 1.25, the rating is determined to be medium if the ratio is above 1.25 and below 2, and the rating is determined to be high if the ratio is equal to or greater than 2.
4 . The system of claim 2 , further comprising a transaction evaluator operably coupled to a point of sale system at a retail site and a transaction processing system and configured to:
receive the monetary value of a pending untraceable transaction,
determine a maximum transaction value for the retail site based on the rating of the retail site such that the maximum transaction value is lower for a retail site with a high rating than for a retail site with a low rating, and
instruct the point of sale system to reject the pending untraceable transaction if the monetary value is higher than the maximum transaction value for the retail site.
5 . The system of claim 2 , further comprising a market rater configured to determine a market rating based on a number of retail sites in the market with a high rating.
6 . The system of claim 1 , wherein at least one of the one or more transaction data providers comprises a data aggregator configured to receive transaction data from a plurality of retail sites.
7 . The system of claim 1 , wherein at least one of the market weighting factors is an exchange rate.
8 . The system of claim 1 , wherein at least one of the market weighting factors is a cost of living adjustment factor.
9 . The system of claim 1 , further comprising a data visualizer configured to store a plurality of renderable structures defining a graphical display of a map view comprising a retail site marker for each retail site within the map view, each retail site marker including an indication of the rating of the retail site.
10 . A method for dynamically determining a monetary value threshold evaluating compliance of untraceable transactions at retail sites within a region, the method comprising:
receiving transaction data comprising a monetary value of a plurality of untraceable transactions within the region;
receiving one or more market weighting factors;
determining a plurality of scaled values each based on the monetary value of one of the plurality of untraceable transactions and the one or more market weighting factors;
receiving a cutoff percentage parameter;
storing a value threshold for the region such that a percentage of transactions within the region with a scaled value below the value threshold is equal to the cutoff percentage parameter;
determining a rating for a retail site within the region based on a ratio of a number of untraceable transactions with a scaled value above the value threshold to a number of untraceable transactions with a scaled value below the value threshold; and
storing the rating in a rating data store such that the rating can be retrieved based on an identifier of the retail site.
11 . The method of claim 10 , wherein the rating is selected from the group consisting of: high, medium, and low.
12 . The method of claim 11 , wherein the rating is determined to be low if the ratio is equal to or less than 1.25, the rating is determined to be medium if the ratio is above 1.25 and below 2, and the rating is determined to be high if the ratio is equal to or greater than 2.
13 . The method of claim 11 , further comprising:
receiving the value of a pending untraceable transaction from a point of sale system at a retail site;
determining a maximum transaction value for the retail site based on the rating of the retail site such that the maximum transaction value is lower for a retail site with a high rating than for a retail site with a low rating; and
instructing the point of sale system to reject the pending untraceable transaction if the value is higher than the maximum transaction value for the retail site.
14 . The method of claim 11 , further comprising determining a rating for a market based on a number of retail sites in the market with a high rating.
15 . The method of claim 10 , wherein the plurality of untraceable transactions is received from a plurality of retail sites.
16 . The method of claim 10 , wherein at least one of the market weighting factors is an exchange rate.
17 . The method of claim 10 , wherein at least one of the market weighting factors is a cost of living adjustment factor.
18 . The method of claim 10 , further comprising storing a plurality of renderable structures defining a graphical display of a map view comprising a retail site marker for each retail site within the map view, each retail site marker including an indication of the rating of the retail site.