IP Library Granted Patent US 10,866,590
Granted Patent B2
US 10,866,590 · App. 16/146,987 · Granted Dec 15, 2020

Computer-assisted or autonomous driving safety-related decision making system and apparatus

Inventors: Xue Yang (San Jose, CA); Sherry Chang (El Dorado Hills, CA); Chaitanya Sreerama (Hillsboro, OR); Linda L. Hurd (Cool, CA); Denica Larsen (Portland, OR)
Assignee: Intel Corporation
G05D1/0221B60W30/00G05D1/0088G05D1/024G05D1/0246G05D1/0255G05D1/0257G05D1/0278G06N3/08G06N20/00G06Q40/08G06Q50/30G05D2201/0213G06N3/0454G07C5/008
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 10,866,590
App. No.
16/146,987
Granted
Dec 15, 2020
Kind
B2
Abstract

Apparatuses, methods, and systems associated with safety-related decision making reporting and regulation of computer-assisted or autonomous driving (CA/AD) vehicles are disclosed herein. In some embodiments, an apparatus includes a safety-related decision making reporting unit, disposed in a CA/AD vehicle, to collect data about driving behavior of the CA/AD vehicle and to determine whether the collected data is related to a safety-related decision making rule. In embodiments, the collected data is to be reported to a remote organization associated with regulating the safety-related decision making rule. In some embodiments, a computing device or server associated with regulating safety-related decision making rules receives the collected data from the CA/AD vehicle and/or manufacturers of the CA/AD vehicle. In embodiments, the computing device analyzes the collected data to modify or generate a safety-decision making rule. Other embodiments are also described and claimed.

Claims (35)

1. An apparatus for computer-assisted or autonomous driving (CA/AD), comprising:

a safety-related decision making reporting unit, disposed in a CA/AD vehicle, to collect data about driving behavior of the CA/AD vehicle and to determine whether the collected data is related to a safety-related decision making rule and whether the collected data is to be reported to a remote organization associated with regulating the safety-related decision making rule; and

a communication interface coupled to the safety-related decision making reporting unit to communicate the collected data to the remote organization, in response to a determination that the collected data is to be reported to the remote organization associated with regulating the safety-related decision making rule, wherein the collected data is used to determine whether the safety-related decision making rule is to be modified and if the safety-related decision making rule is to be modified, the modified safety-related decision making rule is to be included in a plurality of safety-related decision making rules received by the CA/AD vehicle from the remote organization or a manufacturer of the CA/AD vehicle.

2. The apparatus of claim 1 , wherein to determine whether the collected data is related to the safety-related decision making rule includes to determine whether the collected data relates to an accident or a near accident involving pedestrians or other vehicles proximate to the CA/AD vehicle.

3. The apparatus of claim 1 , further comprising a sensor interface coupled to the safety-related decision making reporting unit to receive sensor data related to the driving behavior of the CA/AD vehicle, and to provide the sensor data to the safety-related decision making reporting unit.

4. The apparatus of claim 3 , further comprising at least one of a vision-based camera, radar, light detection and ranging (LiDAR) sensor, microphone, accelerometer, gyroscope, inertia measurement units (IMU), engine sensor, drive train sensor, and/or tire pressure sensor, coupled to the sensor interface, to assist in collecting the sensor data provided to the safety-related decision making reporting unit.

5. The apparatus of claim 1 , wherein the communication interface is further to receive criteria from the remote organization and provide the received criteria to the safety-related decision making reporting unit, wherein the criteria determines whether the data is required to be reported.

6. The apparatus of claim 5 , wherein the safety-related decision making reporting unit includes an analysis component, and the analysis component is to determine whether the collected data about the driving behavior of the CA/AD vehicle meets the criteria.

7. The apparatus of claim 1 , further comprising a navigation control system including a global positioning satellite (GPS) system coupled to the safety-related decision making reporting unit to provide data about driving behavior of the CA/AD vehicle to the safety-related decision making reporting unit.

8. A method for vehicle safety-related decision making reporting, comprising:

receiving, by a computer-assisted or autonomous driving (CA/AD) system of a CA/AD vehicle, sensor data about driving behavior of the CA/AD vehicle;

determining, by the CA/AD system, whether the sensor data is related to a safety-related decision rule; and

communicating, by the CA/AD system, the sensor data to a remote organization governing the safety-related decision rule, in response to a determination that the sensor data is related to the safety-related decision rule, wherein the sensor data is used to determine whether the safety-related decision making rule is to be modified and if the safety-related decision making rule is to be modified, the modified safety-related decision making rule is to be included in a plurality of safety-related decision making rules received by the CA/AD vehicle from the remote organization or a manufacturer of the CA/AD vehicle.

9. The method of claim 8 , wherein determining, by the CA/AD system, whether the sensor data is related to the safety-related decision rule includes determining whether the sensor data is related to an accident or near accident involving the CA/AD vehicle, a pedestrian, and/or another CA/AD vehicle.

10. The method of claim 8 , wherein determining, by the CA/AD system, whether the sensor data is related to the safety-related decision rule includes determining whether information included in the sensor data meets criteria set by the remote organization.

11. The method of claim 8 , wherein communicating the sensor data to the remote organization governing the safety-related decision rule comprises communicating the sensor data directly to the remote organization according to an indication that an owner of the CA/AD vehicle gives permission for the sensor data to be communicated to the remote organization.

12. One or more computer-readable media (CRM) containing instructions written thereon to cause a reporting server associated with a manufacturer of computer-assisted or autonomous driving (CA/AD) vehicles, in response to execution of the instructions, to:

receive data from respective CA/AD systems of CA/AD vehicles manufactured by the manufacturer, wherein the data includes driving behavior data of the CA/AD vehicles that are related to a safety-related decision rule;

process the received data to generate composite driving behavior data of the CA/AD vehicles of the manufacturer for the safety-related decision rule; and

provide the composite driving behavior data of the CA/AD vehicles of the manufacturer for the safety-related decision rule to a remote organization that regulates the safety-related decision rule, wherein the composite driving behavior data is used to determine whether the safety-related decision making rule is to be modified and if the safety-related decision making rule is modified, the modified safety-related decision making rule is to be included in a plurality of safety-related decision making rules provided from the remote organization or the manufacturer to the CA/AD vehicle.

13. The one or more computer-readable media (CRM) of claim 12 , wherein the reporting server is further caused to receive, from the remote organization, the safety-related decision rule to be implemented by the CA/AD vehicles.

14. The one or more computer-readable media (CRM) of claim 13 , wherein the reporting server is further caused to receive, from the remote organization, criteria for deciding what type of driving behavior data is related to the safety-related decision rule for the CA/AD vehicles, and in response to the receipt of the criteria, provide the criteria to the CA/AD systems of the CA/AD vehicles of the manufacturer.

15. The one or more computer-readable media (CRM) of claim 12 , wherein the reporting server is a third party reporting server that services a plurality of manufacturers of CA/AD vehicles.

16. The one or more computer-readable media (CRM) of claim 12 , wherein the composite driving behavior data of the CA/AD vehicles of the manufacturer for the safety-related decision rule provided to the remote organization is required by law to be provided to the remote organization.

17. One or more computer-readable media (CRM) containing instructions written thereon to cause a server associated with regulating safety-related decision making rules for computer-assisted or autonomous driving (CA/AD) vehicles, in response to execution of the instructions, to:

receive data from manufacturers of CA/AD vehicles, wherein the received data includes composite driving information related to safety-related decision making behavior of respective CA/AD vehicles of respective manufacturers of the manufacturers of CA/AD vehicles;

analyze the received data to modify or generate one or more safety-related decision making rules for the respective CA/AD vehicles; and

provide the modified or generated one or more safety-related decision making rules in a plurality of safety-related decision making rules provided to the CA/AD vehicles or to respective manufacturers of the respective CA/AD vehicles.

18. The one or more CRM of claim 17 , wherein the composite driving information is received by the respective manufacturers from CA/AD systems of the respective CA/AD vehicles manufactured by the manufacturer.

19. The one of more CRM of claim 17 , wherein the modified or generated one or more safety-related decision making rules is to be implemented by the respective manufacturers in the respective CA/AD vehicles.

20. The one or more CRM of claim 19 , wherein the safety-related decision making rules to be implemented in the respective CA/AD vehicles are required by law to be implemented in the respective CA/AD vehicles.

21. The one of more CRM of claim 17 , wherein the server is further caused to analyze the received data to determine a cause of an accident or a near accident involving one or more of the respective CA/AD vehicles and to base the modification or generation of additional one or more safety-related decision rules on ethical rules related to an outcome of the accident or the near accident.

22. The one of more CRM of claim 21 , wherein the server is further caused to analyze the received data to determine whether the outcome of the accident or near accident is related to a safety-related decision rule implemented in one or more of the CA/AD vehicles.

23. The one of more CRM of claim 22 , wherein the server is further caused to access a database including information related to scenarios associated with similar accidents or near accidents to assist in the modification or generation of the additional one or more safety-related decision rules.

24. The one of more CRM of claim 17 , wherein the server is further to provide information related to a smart regulation contract to the respective manufacturers of the respective CA/AD vehicles.

Assignments (2)
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded May 16, 2024
From: INTEL CORPORATION
To: MOBILEYE VISION TECHNOLOGIES LTD.
Reel/Frame 067435/0543 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Sep 28, 2018
From: YANG, XUE; CHANG, SHERRY; SREERAMA, CHAITANYA; HURD, LINDA L.; LARSEN, DENICA
To: INTEL CORPORATION
Reel/Frame 047011/0373 →
Continuity (1)
Related Publication 20190049982A1 · Feb 14, 2019