Methods, systems and devices for pre-operatively planned adaptive glenoid implants

1. A pre-operative planning method for designing a glenoid implant, the method comprising:

pre-operative analysis comprising:

aligning an anterior edge of a glenoid implant with an anterior edge of a glenoid bone;

adjusting a retroversion of the glenoid implant;

adjusting an augmentation of the glenoid implant;

adjusting an inferior tilt of the glenoid implant;

evaluating bone support for the glenoid implant, wherein an amount of a rear surface of the glenoid implant that is supported by or touching bone is assessed;

adjusting a medialization of the glenoid implant by assessing the volumetric amount of bone needed to be removed by reaming, or the minimum total distance of reaming necessary, in order to optimize the bone to implant interface;

analyzing fixation support in the absence of central pegs that penetrate a vault medially;

measuring and matching widths of the glenoid implant and the glenoid bone after reaming and aligning inferior and superior axes of the glenoid implant and bone; and

designing a glenoid implant based on the pre-operative analysis.

2. The method of claim 1 , further comprising analyzing a joint line, comprising comparing an original joint line and a new joint line, wherein the new joint line is substantially similar to the original joint line.

3. The method of claim 1 , further comprising comparing vectors in three dimensions which represent the distance and direction between tendon and muscle insertions on the scapula and the humerus for measuring the distance of relocation of humeral tuberosity compared to the scapula.

4. The method of claim 1 , further comprising determining the diameter of the humeral head.

5. The method of claim 1 , further comprising determining the height of humeral head.

6. The method of claim 1 , further comprising determining the size of a humeral bone implant from digital images.

7. The method of claim 1 , further comprising determining a best fit size of humeral implant from a range of sizes, wherein the range of sizes is selected from the group consisting of length of stem, size of humeral stem, diameter of stem, size diameter of head, height of head, and offset of the center spherical head compared to the center of the face of the humeral stem.

8. The method of claim 1 , further comprising conducting range of motion analysis, including virtually positioning implants through extreme ranges of motion to measure impact locations and compensate for necessary functional range of motion.

9. The method of claim 1 , further comprising conducting soft tissue analysis, comprising determining key soft tissue insertion points, measuring distances in three dimensions for comparison to pre-operative conditions, and assessing lengths at extreme ranges of motion, such that total soft tissue length change or contraction is substantially maintained within anatomical ranges in order to substantially achieve most common activities of daily living.

10. The method of claim 1 , further comprising assessing and adjusting as needed the thickness/height of the glenoid implant.

11. The method of claim 1 , further comprising assessing and adjusting as needed the depth of the glenoid fossa.

12. The method of claim 1 , further comprising assessing and adjusting the thickness of a graft.

13. The method of claim 1 , wherein the pre-operative planning is done virtually based on images taken from a subject prior to surgery.

14. The method of claim 1 , further comprising optimizing the dimensions of fixation elements of the glenoid implant using correspondence matrix between a three dimensional (3D) bony structure of the patient and a statistical shape based atlas according to the following steps:

developing a registration between patient bone and statistical shape model of the bone of interest;

extracting the principle modes representing the patient bone;

defining the fixation configuration (position and dimensions) according to the corresponding modes; and

applying collision detection to confirm the configuration of the bone fixation.

15. The method of claim 1 , further comprising identifying procedural risks by determining:

whether a glenoid face coverage is maximized;

whether an overhang of the glenoid face is minimized;

whether bone removal on the glenoid face is minimized;

whether the glenoid retroversion is less than about 5 to about 10 degrees;

whether seating of the glenoid implant is greater than about 80% of the implant coverage area;

whether there is minimized penetration of the glenoid cortical wall anteriorily;

whether there is greater than about 3 mm bone thickness behind glenoid;

whether the orientation offset between the native glenoid and implant superior/inferior axis is less than about 5 degrees;

whether the superior or inferior tilt versus native glenoid is less than 5 degrees;

whether there is an absence of a humeral head overhang compared to the cut, or prepared surface of the humeral bone;

whether there is less than about 3 mm difference in humeral head diameter between anatomic and implant;

whether there is less than about 1 mm difference in humeral head height between anatomic and implant; and

whether there is less than about 2 mm greater tuberosity to medial head edge in comparison to anatomic;

whereby procedural risks are identified; and

designing a glenoid implant based on the identified procedural risks.

16. The method of claim 1 , further comprising designing a shoulder surgery guide based upon the method steps.

17. The method of claim 16 , further comprising producing a shoulder surgery guide, wherein producing the shoulder surgery guide comprises using a 3D printing device.

18. The method of claim 1 , further comprising recommending prosthetic shoulder implants and placement positions, selected from the group consisting of adjustments in glenoid implant size, augmentation depth, augment position, positioning in six degrees of freedom, fixation type, fixation size, reaming depth, reaming diameter, reaming angle(s) and/or a combination thereof.

19. The method of claim 1 , further comprising a computer readable medium having stored thereon executable instructions that when executed by the processor of a computer control the computer to perform one or more of the planning method steps.

20. The method of claim 19 , wherein the computer readable medium having stored thereon executable instructions that when executed by the processor of a computer control the computer to generate a virtual three dimensional model of a glenoid implant reflecting one or more optimized parameters determined during pre-operative planning.

21. The method of claim 19 , wherein the computer readable medium having stored thereon executable instructions that when executed by the processor of a computer control the computer to control a 3D printing device in communication with the computer, whereby the 3D printing device prints a glenoid implant for use in shoulder replacement surgery in a patient for which pre-operative planning was conducted.

22. The method of claim 19 , wherein the computer readable medium having stored thereon executable instructions that when executed by the processor of a computer control the computer to generate a virtual three dimensional model of a glenoid implant reflecting one or more optimized parameters determined during pre-operative planning.

23. A method of treating a patient comprising:

providing a patient to be treated;

completing the pre-operative planning method of claim 1 ;

designing and producing a glenoid implant based on the pre-operative planning; and

treating the patient by surgically implanting one or more of the glenoid implants.

24. The method of claim 23 , wherein the subject is a human subject in need of shoulder replacement surgery.

25. The method of claim 23 , wherein the glenoid implant comprises an augmented glenoid implant, wherein the augmentation is specific to the patient.

26. A pre-operative planning method for designing a glenoid implant, the method comprising:

conducting pre-operative planning comprising:

analyzing a joint line, comprising comparing an original joint line and a new joint line, wherein the new joint line is substantially similar to the original joint line;

comparing vectors in three dimensions which represent the distance and direction between tendon and muscle insertions on the scapula and the humerus for measuring the distance of relocation of humeral tuberosity compared to the scapula;

determining the diameter of the humeral head;

determining the height of humeral head;

determining the size of humeral bone implant from digital images;

determining a best fit size of humeral implant from a range of sizes, wherein the range of sizes is selected from the group consisting of length of stem, size of humeral stem, diameter of stem, size diameter of head, height of head, and offset of the center spherical head compared to the center of the face of the humeral stem;

conducting range of motion analysis, including virtually positioning implants through extreme ranges of motion to measure impact locations and compensate for necessary functional range of motion;

conducting soft tissue analysis, comprising determining key soft tissue insertion points, measuring distances in three dimensions for comparison to pre-operative conditions, and assessing lengths at extreme ranges of motion, such that total soft tissue length change or contraction is substantially maintained within anatomical ranges in order to substantially achieve most common activities of daily living;

assessing and adjusting as needed the thickness/height of the glenoid implant;

assessing and adjusting as needed the depth of the glenoid fossa; and

assessing and adjusting the thickness of a graft; and

designing a glenoid implant based on the pre-operative analysis, including assessing and adjusting the glenoid thickness, glenoid fossa depth, and graft thickness based on the pre-operative analysis.