IP Library Granted Patent US 10,282,692
Granted Patent B2
US 10,282,692 · App. 16/159,634 · Granted May 7, 2019

Data processing systems for identifying, assessing, and remediating data processing risks using data modeling techniques

Inventors: Kabir A. Barday (Atlanta, GA); Mihir S. Karanjkar (Marietta, GA); Steven W. Finch (Kennesaw, GA); Ken A. Browne (Johns Creek, GA); Nathan W. Heard (Merietta, GA); Aakash H. Patel (Norcross, GA); Jason L. Sabourin (Brookhaven, GA); Richard L. Daniel (Atlanta, GA); Dylan D. Patton-Kuhl (Atlanta, GA); Kevin Jones (Atlanta, GA); Jonathan Blake Brannon (Smyrna, GA)
Assignee: OneTrust, LLC
G06Q10/0635G06F21/6245G06Q10/067
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 10,282,692
App. No.
16/159,634
Granted
May 7, 2019
Kind
B2
Abstract

In various embodiments, a system may be configured to substantially automatically determine whether to take one or more actions in response to one or more identified risk triggers (e.g., data breaches, regulation change, etc.). The system may, for example: (1) compare the potential risk trigger to one or more previous risks triggers experienced by the particular entity at a previous time; (2) identify a similar previous risk trigger (e.g., one or more previous risk triggers related to a similar change in regulation, breach of data, type of issue identified, etc.); (3) determine the relevance of the current risk trigger based at least in part on a determined relevance of the previous risk trigger; and (4) determine whether to take one or more actions to the current risk trigger based at least in part on one or more determined actions to take in response to the previous, similar risk trigger.

Claims (54)

1. A computer-implemented data processing method of identifying and responding to one or more potential risk triggers based on a data model, the method comprising:

identifying, by at least one processor, one or more potential risk triggers for an entity;

assessing and analyzing, by the at least one processor, the one or more potential risk triggers to determine a relevance of a risk posed to the entity by the one or more potential risk triggers, wherein determining the relevance of the risk posed to the entity comprises:

identifying one or more similarly situated entities, the one or more similarly situated entities being situated similarly to the entity,

comparing, the one or more potential risk triggers to one or more previous risk triggers experienced by the one or more similarly situated entities,

identifying one or more similar risk triggers from the one or more previous risk triggers, the one or more similar risk triggers being similar to the one or more potential risk triggers,

analyzing the one or more similar risk triggers to determine a relevance, determined by the one or more similarly situated entities, of the one or more similar risk triggers, and

determining the relevance of the risk posed by the one or more potential risk triggers based at least in part on the determined relevance of the one or more similar risk triggers determined by the one or more similarly situated entities;

identifying, by the at least one processor using one or more data modeling techniques, one or more data assets, associated with the entity, that may be affected by the risk, wherein identifying the one or more data assets that may be affected by the risk comprises:

scanning a respective digital inventory for each of the one or more data assets, each respective digital inventory comprising one or more inventory attributes, and

analyzing each respective digital inventory to determine one or more inventory attributes that may be affected by the risk;

determining, by the at least one processor, based at least in part on the one or more identified data assets and the relevance of the risk posed to the entity by the one or more potential risk triggers, whether to take one or more actions in response to the one or more potential risk triggers; and

in response to determining to take the one or more actions, taking, by the at least one processor, the one or more actions to remediate the risk.

2. The computer-implemented data processing method of claim 1 , wherein

each respective digital inventory comprises one or more inventory attributes selected from a group consisting of:

one or more processing activities associated with each respective data asset;

transfer data associated with each respective data asset; and

one or more pieces of personal data associated with each respective data asset.

3. The computer-implemented data processing method of claim 1 , wherein the one or more potential risk triggers comprise a change to one or more regulations related to the storage of personal data by the one or more data assets.

4. The computer-implemented data processing method of claim 1 , wherein the one or more potential risk triggers comprise a data breach associated with the one or more data assets.

5. The computer-implemented data processing method of claim 1 , wherein determining the relevance of the risk comprises calculating a risk level of the one or more potential risk triggers based at least in part on one or more risk factors.

6. The computer-implemented data processing method of claim 1 , wherein determining the relevance of the risk posed by the one or more potential risk triggers further comprises:

identifying one or more particular previous risk triggers experienced by the entity;

identifying one or more particular similar risk triggers from the one or more particular previous risk triggers, the one or more particular similar risk triggers being similar to the one or more particular previous risk triggers; and

determining the relevance of a risk posed by the one or more potential risk triggers based at least in part on a previously determined relevance of the one or more particular similar risk triggers.

7. The computer-implemented data processing method of claim 6 , wherein determining whether to take one or more actions in response to the one or more potential risk triggers comprises determining whether to take the one or more actions based at least in part on one or more actions taken by the entity in response to the one or more particular similar risk triggers.

8. The computer-implemented data processing method of claim 1 , wherein identifying the one or more similarly situated entities comprises identifying one or more similarly situated entities from a group of potentially similarly situated entities based at least in part on one or more factors selected from the group consisting of: (1) a location of each potentially similarly situated entity; and (2) an industry of each potentially similarly situated entity.

9. The computer-implemented data processing method of claim 8 , wherein determining whether to take one or more actions in response to the one or more potential risk triggers comprises determining whether to take the one or more actions based at least in part on one or more actions taken by the one or more similarly situated entities in response to the one or more similar risk triggers.

10. The computer-implemented data processing method of claim 9 , wherein: the one or more similarly situated entities comprise one or more entities selected from the group consisting of: (1) one or more other entities in a similar location as the entity that has identified the one or more potential risk triggers; (2) one or more other entities in a similar industry to an industry of the entity that has identified the one or more potential risk triggers; (3); one or more entities of a similar size to the entity that has identified the one or more potential risk triggers; and (4) one or more entities that are governed by one or more regulations that are similar to regulations that govern the entity that has identified the one or more potential risk triggers.

11. The computer-implemented data processing method of claim 1 , wherein the at least one processor takes the one or more actions to remediate the risk in response to identifying the one or more potential risk triggers.

12. A computer-implemented data processing method for updating risk remediation data of a data model, the method comprising:

accessing, by at least one processor, risk remediation data for an entity that has identified one or more suitable actions to remediate a risk in response to identifying one or more data assets of the entity that may be affected by one or more potential risk triggers;

receiving, by the at least one processor, an indication of an update to the one or more data assets;

identifying, by the at least one processor, one or more potential new risk triggers for an entity that have arisen due to the update of the one or more data assets;

assessing and analyzing, by the at least one processor, the one or more potential new risk triggers to determine a relevance of a risk posed to the entity by the one or more potential new risk triggers, wherein assessing and analyzing the one or more potential new risk triggers to determine the relevance of the risk posed to the entity comprises:

identifying one or more similarly situated entities, the one or more similarly situated entities being situated similarly to the entity,

comparing the one or more potential risk triggers to one or more previous risk triggers experienced by the one or more similarly situated entities,

identifying one or more similar risk triggers from the one or more previous risk triggers, the one or more similar risk triggers being similar to the one or more potential new risk triggers,

analyzing the one or more similar risk triggers to determine a relevance of the one or more similar risk triggers experienced by the one or more similarly situated entities, and

determining the relevance of the risk posed by the one or more potential risk triggers based at least in part on a determined relevance of the one or more similar risk triggers that has been determined by the one or more similarly situated entities;

identifying, by the at least one processor using one or more data modeling techniques, one or more data assets associated with the entity that may be affected by the risk, wherein identifying the one or more data assets that may be affected by the risk comprises:

scanning a respective digital inventory for each of the one or more data assets, each respective digital inventory comprising one or more inventory attributes, and

analyzing each respective digital inventory to determine one or more inventory attributes that may be affected by the risk;

updating, by the at least one processor, the risk remediation data to include the one or more actions to remediate the risk in response to identifying the one or more potential updated risk triggers;

determining, by the at least one processor, based at least in part on the one or more identified data assets and the relevance of the risk, whether to take the one or more actions in response to the one or more potential updated risk triggers; and

taking, by the at least one processor, the one or more actions to remediate the risk in response to identifying the one or more potential risk triggers.

13. The computer-implemented data processing method of claim 12 , wherein the update to the risk remediation data is performed automatically.

14. The computer-implemented data processing method of claim 12 , wherein

the one or more inventory attributes are selected from a group consisting of:

processing activities associated with each respective data asset;

transfer data associated with each respective data asset; and

one or more pieces of personal data associated with each respective data asset.

15. The computer-implemented data processing method of claim 12 , wherein the one or more potential risk triggers comprise a change to one or more regulations related to the storage of personal data by the one or more data assets.

16. The computer-implemented data processing method of claim 12 , wherein the one or more potential risk triggers comprise a data breach associated with the one or more data assets.

Assignments (2)
SECURITY INTEREST Recorded Jul 5, 2022
From: ONETRUST LLC
To: KEYBANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, AS ADMINISTRATIVE AGENT
Reel/Frame 060573/0001 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Oct 16, 2018
From: BARDAY, KABIR A.; KARANJKAR, MIHIR S.; FINCH, STEVEN W.; BROWNE, KEN A.; HEARD, NATHAN W.; PATEL, AAKASH H.; SABOURIN, JASON L.; DANIEL, RICHARD L.; PATTON-KUHL, DYLAN D.; JONES, KEVIN; BRANNON, JONATHAN BLAKE
To: ONETRUST, LLC
Reel/Frame 047186/0191 →
Continuity (14)
Continuation In Part 16055083 · Aug 4, 2018
Continuation In Part 15996208 · Jun 1, 2018
Continuation In Part 15853674 · Dec 22, 2017
Continuation In Part 15619455 · Jun 10, 2017
Continuation In Part 15254901 · Sep 1, 2016
Provisional Application 62728435 · Sep 7, 2018
Provisional Application 62572096 · Oct 13, 2017
Provisional Application 62547530 · Aug 18, 2017
Provisional Application 62541613 · Aug 4, 2017
Provisional Application 62537839 · Jul 27, 2017
Provisional Application 62360123 · Jul 8, 2016
Provisional Application 62353802 · Jun 23, 2016
Provisional Application 62348695 · Jun 10, 2016
Related Publication 20190050766A1 · Feb 14, 2019