IP Library Granted Patent US 10,798,055
Granted Patent B2
US 10,798,055 · App. 16/182,555 · Granted Oct 6, 2020

Detecting relayed communications

Inventors: Saar Wilf (Tel Aviv, IL); Shvat Shaked (Jerusalem, IL)
Assignee: PAYPAL ISRAEL LTD.
H04L61/2589H04L41/12H04L63/0281H04L63/1441H04L63/20H04L67/02H04L67/2814H04L67/42H04L63/126
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 10,798,055
App. No.
16/182,555
Granted
Oct 6, 2020
Kind
B2
Abstract

Methods, apparatus and computer readable code for determining whether a potential relay device is a relay device are provided herein. In some embodiments, first and second information elements are received from a potential relay device, which is an original source of the second information element. In order to determine whether the potential relay device is a relay device, it is determined whether a feature of an original source of the first information element and a feature of the potential relay device are features unlikely to relate to a single device, wherein a positive result of the determining is indicative that the potential relay device is a relay device. In an exemplary embodiment, a disclosed system includes an information element receiver and a feature incompatibility analyzer. Optionally, the disclosed system includes a feature discovery module, a parameter obtainer and a feature database.

Claims (50)

1. A system, comprising:

one or more processors, one or more computer-readable memories, with program instructions stored on the one or more computer-readable memories, the one or more processors configured to execute the program instructions to cause the system to perform operations comprising:

receiving a communication from a device, the communication including first device information for the device and second device information for a source device of the communication;

determining that the first device information and the second device information are incompatible;

in response to the determining that the first device information and the second device information are incompatible, determining a first latency of a first communication for the device based on the first device information;

determining a second latency of a second communication for the source device based on the second device information;

determining a maximum communication rate of the device and the source device based at least on the first communication and the second communication; and

determining that the device is a relay device based at least on the determining that the first device information and the second device information are incompatible, the first and second latencies, and the maximum communication rate.

2. The system of claim 1 , wherein the first device information corresponds to a first operating system and the second device information corresponds to a second operating system.

3. The system of claim 1 , wherein the first device information corresponds to a first location and the second device information corresponds to a second location.

4. The system of claim 3 , wherein the operations further comprise:

determining that the first device information corresponds to the first location using internet protocol (IP) address information associated with the communication from an IP database; and

determining that the second device information corresponds to the second location includes analyzing location information in a header of the communication.

5. The system of claim 1 , wherein the first device information corresponds to a first sub-network and the second device information corresponds to a second sub-network.

6. The system of claim 1 , wherein the first device information corresponds to a first administrator and the second device information corresponds to a second administrator.

7. The system of claim 6 , wherein the operations further comprise:

determining that the first device information corresponds to the first administrator using internet protocol (IP) address information associated with the communication from an IP database; and

determining that the second device information corresponds to the second administrator includes analyzing administrator information in a header of the communication.

8. A method comprising:

receiving, by one or more processors, a communication from a device, the communication including first device information for the device and second device information for a source device of the communication;

determining, by one or more processors, that the first device information and the second device information are incompatible;

in response to the determining that the first device information and the second device information are incompatible, determining a first latency of a first communication for the device based on the first device information;

determining a second latency of a second communication for the source device based on the second device information;

determining a maximum communication rate of the device and the source device based at least on the first communication and the second communication; and

determining, by one or more processors, that the device is a relay device based at least on the determining that the first device information and the second device information are incompatible, the first and second latencies, and the maximum communication rate second.

9. The method of claim 8 , wherein the first device information corresponds to a first operating system and the second device information corresponds to a second operating system.

10. The method of claim 8 , wherein the first device information corresponds to a first location and the second device information corresponds to a second location.

11. The method of claim 10 , further comprising:

determining that the first device information corresponds to the first location using internet protocol (IP) address information associated with the communication with an IP database; and

determining that the second device information corresponds to the second location includes analyzing location information in a header of the communication.

12. The method of claim 8 , wherein the first device information corresponds to a first sub-network and the second device information corresponds to a second sub-network.

13. The method of claim 8 , wherein the first device information corresponds to a first administrator and the second device information corresponds to a second administrator.

14. The method of claim 13 , further comprising:

determining that the first device information corresponds to the first administrator using internet protocol (IP) address information associated with the communication with an IP database; and

determining that the second device information corresponds to the second administrator includes analyzing administrator information in a header of the communication.

15. A computer program product comprising:

one or more computer-readable tangible storage devices, and program instructions stored on at least one of the one or more storage devices, the program instructions when executed cause a machine to perform operations comprising:

receiving a communication from a device, the communication including first device information for the device and second device information for a source device of the communication;

determining that the first device information and the second device information are incompatible;

in response to determining that the first device information and the second device information are incompatible, determining a first latency of a first communication for the device based on the first device information;

determining a second latency of a second communication for the source device based on the second device information;

determining a maximum communication rate of the device and the source device based at least on the first communication and the second communication; and

determining that the device is a relay device based at least on the determining that the first device information and the second device information are incompatible, the first and second latencies, and the maximum communication rate.

16. The computer program product of claim 15 , wherein the first device information corresponds to a first operating system and the second device information corresponds to a second operating system.

17. The computer program product of claim 15 , wherein the first device information corresponds to a first location and the second device information corresponds to a second location.

18. The computer program product of claim 17 , wherein the operations further comprise:

determining that the first device information corresponds to the first location using internet protocol (IP) address information associated with the communication with an IP database; and

determining that the second device information corresponds to the second location includes analyzing location information in a header of the communication.

19. The computer program product of claim 15 , wherein the first device information corresponds to a first sub-network and the second device information corresponds to a second sub-network.

20. The computer program product of claim 15 , wherein the first device information corresponds to a first administrator and the second device information corresponds to a second administrator.

Assignments (3)
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Nov 12, 2018
From: WILF, SAAR; SHAKED, SHVAT
To: NPX TECHNOLOGIES LTD.
Reel/Frame 047478/0717 →
CHANGE OF NAME Recorded Nov 12, 2018
From: NPX TECHNOLOGIES LTD.
To: FRAUD SCIENCES LTD.
Reel/Frame 047478/0725 →
CHANGE OF NAME Recorded Nov 12, 2018
From: FRAUD SCIENCES LTD.
To: PAYPAL ISRAEL LTD.
Reel/Frame 047478/0739 →
Continuity (4)
Continuation 14630494 · Feb 24, 2015
Continuation 10585517
Provisional Application 60534927 · Jan 9, 2004
Related Publication 20190182210A1 · Jun 13, 2019