IP Library Granted Patent US 10,515,382
Granted Patent B2
US 10,515,382 · App. 16/193,618 · Granted Dec 24, 2019

System and method for aggregation, enhancing, analysis or presentation of data for vehicles or other commodities

Inventors: Thomas Taira (Berkeley, CA); Scott Painter (Bel Air, CA); Chris Taylor (Austin, TX); Robert Taylor (Austin, TX); Michael D. Swinson (Santa Monica, CA)
Assignee: TrueCar, Inc.
G06Q30/0206G06Q10/067G06Q30/02G06Q30/0205G06Q30/0207G06Q30/0278G06Q30/0282G06Q30/0283G06Q30/0601G06Q30/0605G06Q30/0609G06Q30/0611G06Q30/0621G06Q30/0623G06Q30/0629G06Q30/0641G06Q30/0643G06Q30/08G06Q40/12
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 10,515,382
App. No.
16/193,618
Granted
Dec 24, 2019
Kind
B2
Abstract

Embodiments of systems and methods for the aggregation, analysis, display and monetization of pricing data for commodities in general, and which may be particularly useful applied to vehicles are disclosed. Specifically, in certain embodiments, historical transaction data associated with a particular vehicle configuration may be obtained and processed to determine pricing data associated with the vehicle configuration. The historical transaction data or determined pricing data may then be presented in an intuitive manner.

Claims (40)

1. A system, comprising:

a vehicle data system coupled to one or more computer devices over a network, comprising:

a processor; and

a non-transitory computer readable medium, comprising instructions executable to:

obtain historical sales data, wherein the historical sales data comprises data on vehicle sales received from a set of data sources coupled to the vehicle data system over the network;

determine a plurality of sets of the historical sales data, where each of the plurality of sets of historical sales data is associated with a vehicle configuration;

determine pricing data corresponding to the vehicle configuration by applying one or more models to the set of historical sales data associated with the vehicle configuration, wherein the pricing data includes a set of resulting sale price based data and one or more quantifiable prices determined based on the set of historical sales data associated with the vehicle configuration;

receive a specified vehicle configuration; and

generate an interface based on the pricing data associated with the specified vehicle configuration, wherein the generation of the interface is initiated substantially simultaneously to the reception of the specified vehicle configuration and the interface is configured to present the pricing data, and wherein the quantifiable prices are presented relative to the set of resulting sale price based data.

2. The system of claim 1 , wherein the one or more models include a dealer cost model for a manufacturer associated with the vehicle configuration.

3. The system of claim 2 , wherein the dealer cost model is determined for the manufacturer based on invoice data corresponding to the manufacturer and the dealer cost model defines holdback as a function of one or more pieces of invoice data.

4. The system of claim 3 , wherein the one or more models include a price ratio model associated with the vehicle configuration.

5. The system of claim 4 , wherein the price ratio model is of the form f(x)=Σ i=0 n Σ k=0 m (β i X i X bk ) where X i signifies global variables, X bk signifies bin-level variables for a specific bin b of historical sales data, and β i 's are coefficients.

6. The system of claim 1 , wherein the one or more quantifiable prices are price points or price ranges.

7. The system of claim 6 , wherein the one or more quantifiable prices include one or more reference pricing data points, wherein the reference pricing data points are presented relative to the set of resulting sale price based data.

8. A method, comprising:

at a vehicle data system coupled to one or more computer devices over a network:

obtaining historical sales data, wherein the historical sales data comprises data on vehicle sales received from a set of data sources coupled to the vehicle data system over the network;

determining a plurality of sets of the historical sales data, where each of the plurality of sets of historical sales data is associated with a vehicle configuration;

determining pricing data corresponding to the vehicle configuration by applying one or more models to the set of historical sales data associated with the vehicle configuration, wherein the pricing data includes a set of resulting sale price based data and one or more quantifiable prices determined based on the set of historical sales data associated with the vehicle configuration;

receiving a specified vehicle configuration; and

generating an interface based on the pricing data associated with the specified vehicle configuration, wherein the generation of the interface is initiated substantially simultaneously to the reception of the specified vehicle configuration and the interface is configured to present the pricing data, and wherein the quantifiable prices are presented relative to the set of resulting sale price based data.

9. The method of claim 8 , wherein the one or more models include a dealer cost model for a manufacturer associated with the vehicle configuration.

10. The method of claim 9 , wherein the dealer cost model is determined for the manufacturer based on invoice data corresponding to the manufacturer and the dealer cost model defines holdback as a function of one or more pieces of invoice data.

11. The method of claim 10 , wherein the one or more models include a price ratio model associated with the vehicle configuration.

12. The method of claim 11 , wherein the price ratio model is of the form f(x)=Σ i=0 n Σ k=0 m (β i X i X bk ) where X i signifies global variables, X bk signifies bin-level variables for a specific bin b of historical sales data, and β i 's are coefficients.

13. The method of claim 8 , wherein the one or more quantifiable prices are price points or price ranges.

14. The method of claim 13 , wherein the one or more quantifiable prices include one or more reference pricing data points, wherein the reference pricing data points are presented relative to the set of resulting sale price based data.

15. A non-transitory computer readable medium, comprising instructions for:

obtaining historical sales data at a vehicle data system coupled to one or more computer devices over a network, wherein the historical sales data comprises data on vehicle sales received from a set of data sources coupled to the vehicle data system over the network;

determining a plurality of sets of the historical sales data, where each of the plurality of sets of historical sales data is associated with a vehicle configuration;

determining pricing data corresponding to the vehicle configuration by applying one or more models to the set of historical sales data associated with the vehicle configuration, wherein the pricing data includes a set of resulting sale price based data and one or more quantifiable prices determined based on the set of historical sales data associated with the vehicle configuration;

receiving a specified vehicle configuration; and

generating an interface based on the pricing data associated with the specified vehicle configuration, wherein the generation of the interface is initiated substantially simultaneously to the reception of the specified vehicle configuration and the interface is configured to present the pricing data, and wherein the quantifiable prices are presented relative to the set of resulting sale price based data.

16. The non-transitory computer readable medium of claim 15 , wherein the one or more models include a dealer cost model for a manufacturer associated with the vehicle configuration.

17. The non-transitory computer readable medium of claim 16 , wherein the dealer cost model is determined for the manufacturer based on invoice data corresponding to the manufacturer and the dealer cost model defines holdback as a function of one or more pieces of invoice data.

18. The non-transitory computer readable medium of claim 17 , wherein the one or more models include a price ratio model associated with the vehicle configuration.

19. The non-transitory computer readable medium of claim 18 , wherein the price ratio model is of the form f(x)=Σ i=0 n Σ k=0 m (β i X i X bk ) where X i signifies global variables, X bk signifies bin-level variables for a specific bin b of historical sales data, and β i 's are coefficients.

20. The non-transitory computer readable medium of claim 15 , wherein the one or more quantifiable prices are price points or price ranges.

21. The non-transitory computer readable medium of claim 20 , wherein the one or more quantifiable prices include one or more reference pricing data points, wherein the reference pricing data points are presented relative to the set of resulting sale price based data.

Assignments (3)
CORRECTIVE ASSIGNMENT TO CORRECT THE RECEIVING PARTY DATA PREVIOUSLY RECORDED AT REEL: 48158 FRAME: 819. ASSIGNOR(S) HEREBY CONFIRMS THE ASSIGNMENT. Recorded Mar 27, 2025
From: TAIRA, TOM; PAINTER, SCOTT; TAYLOR, CHRIS; TAYLOR, ROBERT; SWINSON, MIKE
To: TRUECAR, INC.
Reel/Frame 070669/0938 →
SECURITY INTEREST Recorded Apr 9, 2021
From: TRUECAR, INC.
To: SILICON VALLEY BANK
Reel/Frame 055873/0083 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Jan 28, 2019
From: TAIRA, TOM; PAINTER, SCOTT; TAYLOR, CHRIS; TAYLOR, ROBERT; SWINSON, MIKE
To: TRUECAR, INC
Reel/Frame 048158/0819 →
Continuity (8)
Continuation 15864855 · Jan 8, 2018
Continuation 15631318 · Jun 23, 2017
Continuation 14666005 · Mar 23, 2015
Continuation 14256791 · Apr 18, 2014
Continuation 12556076 · Sep 9, 2009
Provisional Application 61095376 · Sep 9, 2008
Provisional Application 61095550 · Sep 9, 2008
Related Publication 20190139065A1 · May 9, 2019
Cited By (7)
US 12,265,578 US 12,321,968 US 12,346,296 US 12,361,485 US 12,387,142 US 12,461,975 US 12,699,736