IP Library Granted Patent US 10,936,238
Granted Patent B2
US 10,936,238 · App. 16/195,845 · Granted Mar 2, 2021

Hybrid data tiering

Inventors: Tyler Power (Kaiapoi, NZ); Mark Cox (Christchurch, NZ); Mark Emberson (Glebe, AU)
Assignee: Pure Storage, Inc.
G06F3/065G06F3/0619G06F3/0683
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 10,936,238
App. No.
16/195,845
Filed
Nov 19, 2018
Granted
Mar 2, 2021
Kind
B2
Art Unit
2181
USPC
711/117
Abstract

Hybrid data tiering, including: replicating multiple data objects from a first storage location on a first computer system to a second storage location at a second computer system; identifying, in accordance with a retention policy, some of the multiple data objects to continue storing at the first storage location, wherein all of the multiple data objects remain stored at the second storage location; and selecting the identified some of the multiple data objects to remain stored at the first storage location.

Claims (36)

1. A method comprising:

replicating multiple data objects from a first storage location on a first computer system to a second storage location at a second computer system;

selecting, in accordance with a retention policy, some of the multiple data objects to continue storing at the first storage location,

wherein the retention policy specifies that a greater number of references by applications to a given object correspond to a higher priority for the given object remaining stored at the first storage location,

wherein all of the multiple data objects remain stored at the second storage location, and

wherein, in response to a request for one of the multiple data objects not stored at the first storage location, the one of the multiple data objects not stored at the first storage location is retrieved from the second storage location.

2. The method of claim 1 , wherein the first storage location is part of a storage system at a first geographic location, and wherein the second storage location is implemented within a remote, cloud services provider.

3. The method of claim 2 , wherein the cloud services provider implements the second storage location as data object store or block storage.

4. The method of claim 1 , wherein the first storage location is part of a local storage system at a first geographic location, and wherein the second storage location is implemented within a remote storage system.

5. The method of claim 1 , wherein the retention policy is based upon a historical pattern of storage access from one or more processes operating on storage at the first storage location.

6. The method of claim 1 , wherein the retention policy specifies different retention behavior for different users, or wherein the retention policy specifies different retention behavior for different priority processes operating at the first storage location.

7. The method of claim 1 , wherein the selected data objects to remain stored at the first storage location correspond to a data backup, and wherein the retention policy specifies a length of time for the selected data objects to remain stored at the first storage location based on an expected window of time within which data backup is expected to be referenced, and wherein the data objects among the multiple data objects not selected to remain stored at the first storage location are deleted.

8. The method of claim 1 , wherein one or more given data objects not selected to remain stored at the first storage location are not removed until after the one or more given data objects are successfully stored at the second storage location.

9. An apparatus comprising:

one or more hardware processors;

one or more data storage resources; and

a hybrid data tiering controller module configured to:

replicate multiple data objects from a first storage location on a first computer system to a second storage location at a second computer system;

select, in accordance with a retention policy, some of the multiple data objects to continue storing at the first storage location,

wherein the retention policy specifies that a greater number of references by applications to a given object correspond to a higher priority for the given object remaining stored at the first storage location,

wherein all of the multiple data objects remain stored at the second storage location, and

wherein, in response to a request for one of the multiple data objects not stored at the first storage location, the one of the multiple data objects not stored at the first storage location is retrieved from the second storage location.

10. The apparatus of claim 9 , wherein the first storage location is part of a storage system at a first geographic location, and wherein the second storage location is implemented within a remote, cloud services provider.

11. The apparatus of claim 9 , wherein the cloud services provider implements the second storage location as data object store or block storage.

12. The apparatus of claim 9 , wherein the first storage location is part of a local storage system at a first geographic location, and wherein the second storage location is implemented within a remote storage system.

13. The apparatus of claim 9 , wherein the retention policy is based upon a historical pattern of storage access from one or more processes operating on storage at the first storage location.

14. The apparatus of claim 9 , wherein the retention policy specifies different retention behavior for different users, or wherein the retention policy specifies different retention behavior for different priority processes operating at the first storage location.

15. The apparatus of claim 9 , wherein the selected data objects to remain stored at the first storage location correspond to a data backup, and wherein the retention policy specifies a length of time for the selected data objects to remain stored at the first storage location based on an expected window of time within which data backup is expected to be referenced, and wherein the data objects among the multiple data objects not selected to remain stored at the first storage location are deleted.

16. The apparatus of claim 9 , wherein one or more given data objects not selected to remain stored at the first storage location are not removed until after the one or more given data objects are successfully stored at the second storage location.

17. A computer program product disposed upon a computer readable storage medium, the computer program product comprising computer program instructions that, when executed, cause a computer to carry out the steps of:

replicating multiple data objects from a first storage location on a first computer system to a second storage location at a second computer system;

selecting, in accordance with a retention policy, some of the multiple data objects to continue storing at the first storage location,

wherein the retention policy specifies that a greater number of references by applications to a given object correspond to a higher priority for the given object remaining stored at the first storage location,

wherein all of the multiple data objects remain stored at the second storage location,

and wherein, in response to a request for one of the multiple data objects not stored at the first storage location, the one of the multiple data objects not stored at the first storage location is retrieved from the second storage location.

18. The computer program product of claim 17 , wherein the first storage location is part of a storage system at a first geographic location, and wherein the second storage location is implemented within a remote, cloud services provider.

Assignments (3)
TERMINATION AND RELEASE OF SECURITY INTEREST IN PATENT RIGHTS Recorded Jun 11, 2025
From: BARCLAYS BANK PLC, AS ADMINISTRATIVE AGENT
To: PURE STORAGE, INC.
Reel/Frame 071558/0523 →
SECURITY INTEREST Recorded Aug 26, 2020
From: PURE STORAGE, INC.
To: BARCLAYS BANK PLC AS ADMINISTRATIVE AGENT
Reel/Frame 053867/0581 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Jan 24, 2019
From: POWER, TYLER; COX, MARK; EMBERSON, MARK
To: PURE STORAGE, INC.
Reel/Frame 048120/0407 →
Cited By (6)
US 12,204,988 US 12,229,414 US 12,393,332 US 12,455,772 US 12,511,163 US 12,681,774