IP Library Granted Patent US 10,919,524
Granted Patent B2
US 10,919,524 · App. 16/202,234 · Granted Feb 16, 2021

Fault-tolerant computer system for assisted and autonomous driving

Inventors: Stefan Poledna (Klosterneuburg, AT); Eric Schmidt (Grosskrut, AT); Georg Niedrist (Guntramsdorf, AT); Stefan Traxler (Vienna, AT); Hermann Kopetz (Baden, AT)
Assignee: TTTECH AUTO AG
B60W30/09B60W30/0956B60W50/00B60W50/02G05D1/0214B60W2050/0006B60W2554/801
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 10,919,524
App. No.
16/202,234
Granted
Feb 16, 2021
Kind
B2
Abstract

A fault-tolerant computer system (FTCS) for generating safe trajectories for a vehicle. The FTCS includes: a sensor part (SENSE), a primary part (PRIM), a secondary part (SEC), a tertiary part (TER), and a decide part (DECIDE). The PRIM and TER are configured to produce trajectories by interpreting information of the real world as perceived by the SENSE. The SEC is configured to produce a safe space estimate (FSE) by interpreting information of the real world as perceived by SENSE. The DECIDE and/or SEC are configured to execute correctness checks that take trajectories and FSE as inputs, and qualify a trajectory (TRJ) as safe when said TRJ is inside the FSE, and qualify a trajectory (UTRJ) as unsafe when said UTRJ is not inside the FSE.

Claims (24)

1. A fault-tolerant system for generating safe trajectories for a vehicle, the fault-tolerant system comprising:

one or more computers comprising:

a sensor part;

a primary part;

a secondary part;

a tertiary part; and

a decide part,

wherein the primary part and the tertiary part are configured to produce trajectories by interpreting real world information as perceived by the sensor part,

wherein the secondary part is configured to produce a safe space estimate by interpreting the real world information as perceived by the sensor part,

wherein the decide part and/or the secondary part are configured to execute correctness checks that take the trajectories and the safe space estimate as inputs and qualify a trajectory of the trajectories as safe when said trajectory is inside the safe space estimate and unsafe when said trajectory is not inside the safe space estimate,

wherein the one or more computers are configured to cause the vehicle, based on the trajectory being qualified as safe, to fully-autonomously or semi-autonomously maneuver along the trajectory,

wherein the sensor part is developed according to an ASIL level of: a QM level, an ASIL A level, or an ASIL B level,

wherein the primary part is developed according to the ASIL level of: the QM level, the ASIL A level, or the ASIL B level,

wherein the secondary part is developed according to the ASIL level of: the ASIL B level, an ASIL C level, or an ASIL D level,

wherein the tertiary part is developed according to the ASIL level of: the ASIL B level, the ASIL C level, or the ASIL D level, and

wherein the decide part is developed according to the ASIL level of: the ASIL D level.

2. The fault-tolerant system (FTCS) according to claim 1 ,

wherein the secondary part and/or the decide part are configured to execute the correctness checks on the trajectories provided by the primary part and/or the tertiary part.

3. The fault-tolerant system according to claim 1 , wherein the decide part is configured to provide the trajectory from the primary part as being safe when said trajectory is inside the safe space estimate as generated by the secondary part.

4. The fault-tolerant system according to claim 1 , wherein the decide part is configured to provide the trajectory from the tertiary part to the vehicle when: (i) the trajectory or a configurable first number of trajectories provided by the primary part is not inside the safe space estimate as generated by the secondary part; and/or (ii) the primary part does not provide the trajectory or a configurable second number of trajectories at all.

5. The fault-tolerant system according to claim 4 , wherein said first configurable number of trajectories is ≥1 and said second configurable number of trajectories is ≥1.

6. The fault-tolerant system according to claim 1 , wherein the primary part conforms to the QM level as defined in ISO 26262 standard and the secondary part conforms to the ASIL D level as defined in the ISO 26262 standard.

7. The fault-tolerant system according to claim 1 , wherein the primary part conforms to the ASIL A level as defined in ISO 26262 standard and the secondary part conforms to the ASIL C level as defined in the ISO 26262 standard.

8. The fault-tolerant system according to claim 1 , wherein the primary part conforms to the ASIL B level as defined in ISO 26262 standard and the secondary part conforms to the ASIL B level as defined in the ISO 26262 standard.

Assignments (3)
CHANGE OF NAME Recorded Aug 4, 2026
From: TTTECH AUTO AG
To: TRUSTMOTION AUSTRIA GMBH
Reel/Frame 075519/0943 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Feb 12, 2020
From: POLEDNA, STEFAN; SCHMIDT, ERIC; NIEDRIST, GEORG; TRAXLER, STEFAN; KOPETZ, HERMANN
To: TTTECH COMPUTERTECHNIK AG
Reel/Frame 051797/0039 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Apr 29, 2019
From: TTTECH COMPUTERTECHNIK AG
To: TTTECH AUTO AG
Reel/Frame 049021/0787 →
Priority Claims (1)
EP 17205877 · Dec 7, 2017 · regional
Continuity (1)
Related Publication 20190176817A1 · Jun 13, 2019