IP Library Granted Patent US 10,621,475
Granted Patent B2
US 10,621,475 · App. 16/216,010 · Granted Apr 14, 2020

Support vector machine prediction method

Inventor: Omer Moshe Moussaffi (Haifa, IL)
Assignee: Shutterfly, LLC
G06K9/6262G06K9/00288G06K9/6269G06F17/16G06K9/00624G06N20/00G06T11/60
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 10,621,475
App. No.
16/216,010
Granted
Apr 14, 2020
Kind
B2
Abstract

A computer-implemented method is disclosed for image recognition and other applications. The method employs an SVM model and can reduce false negatives and increase recognition accuracies by raising the sample-to-support-vector ratio.

Claims (41)

1. A computer-implemented method, comprising:

selecting a kernel and kernel parameters for a first Support Vector Machine (SVM) model comprising SVM support vector number of support vectors;

testing the first SVM model on a feature matrix T to produce false positive (FP) data set and false negative (FN) data set by a computer system, wherein the feature matrix T includes n feature vectors of length m, wherein n and m are integer numbers;

copying the feature matrix T to produce a feature matrix T_best comprising T_best sample number of sample points;

checking, by the computer system, if a ratio (T_best sample number)/(SVM support vector number) is above a threshold for the first SVM model on T_best; and

if the ratio is above the threshold, performing SVM predictions using the first SVM model on the feature matrix T_best.

2. The computer-implemented method of claim 1 , wherein the n feature vectors are based on faces or objects in images, wherein the first SVM model is used on the feature matrix T_best to classify the faces or the objects in the images.

3. The computer-implemented method of claim 2 , further comprising:

creating an image-product design based on the faces or the objects in the images classified by the first SVM model using the feature matrix T_best.

4. The computer-implemented method of claim 1 , further comprising:

if the ratio (T_best sample number)/(SVM support vector number) is not above the threshold for the first SVM model on T_best, repeating the steps of selecting, testing, automatically removing, retraining, and checking to find a second SVM model having (T_best sample number)/(SVM support vector number) ratio that exceeds the threshold.

5. The computer-implemented method of claim 4 , further comprising:

performing SVM predictions using the second SVM model on the feature matrix T_best.

6. The computer-implemented method of claim 4 , further comprising:

if a SVM model having (T_best sample number)/(SVM support vector number) ratio that exceeds the threshold is not found, selecting a third SVM model that yields a highest (T_best sample number)/(SVM support vector number) ratio in the step of repeating the steps of selecting, testing, automatically removing, retraining, and checking; and

performing SVM predictions using the third SVM model on the feature matrix T_best.

7. The computer-implemented method of claim 1 , wherein the threshold for the (T_best sample number)/(SVM support vector number) ratio is ten or higher.

8. The computer-implemented method of claim 1 , comprising:

applying Grid Search on the feature matrix T to find optimal kernel parameters before the step of testing the first SVM model on a feature matrix T.

9. The computer-implemented method of claim 1 , wherein the feature vectors are based on faces or objects in images, the computer-implemented method further comprising:

classifying the objects and the faces in the images by performing SVM predictions on the feature matrix T_best.

10. The computer-implemented method of claim 9 , further comprising:

automatically creating designs for photo products based on the objects and faces classified by performing SVM predictions on the feature matrix T_best.

11. The computer-implemented method of claim 1 , further comprising:

selecting a feature vector v from the FP data set to remove from the feature matrix T_best to produce a feature matrix T_v;

retraining the first SVM model on the feature matrix T_v to produce a fourth SVM model;

calculating a benefit function to produce a benefit function value, wherein the benefit function is dependent of differences between false positives, false negatives, and numbers of support vectors generated respectively on T_best by the first SVM model and on T_v by the fourth SVM model;

removing the feature vector v from the feature matrix T_best to obtain an updated feature matrix T_best if the benefit function value meets a predetermined criterion; and

performing SVM prediction using the fourth SVM model on the updated feature matrix T_best.

12. The computer-implemented method of claim 11 , wherein the benefit function is dependent more strongly on the difference between the false negatives than on the difference between the false positives.

13. The computer-implemented method of claim 12 , wherein the difference between false negatives has a first weighting coefficient in the benefit function, wherein the difference between false positives has a second weighting coefficient in the benefit function, wherein the first weighting coefficient is larger absolute value than the second weighting coefficient.

14. The computer-implemented method of claim 11 , wherein the n feature vectors are based on faces or objects in images, wherein the fourth SVM model is used on the feature matrix T_best to classify the faces or the objects in the images.

15. The computer-implemented method of claim 14 , further comprising:

creating an image-product design based on the faces or the objects in the images classified by the fourth SVM model using the feature matrix T_best.

16. The computer-implemented method of claim 11 , further comprising:

repeating the steps of selecting a feature vector v, training the first SVM model, performing SVM predictions, calculating a benefit function, and removing the feature vector v from T_best by selecting and removing a different feature vector corresponding to the FP data set from feature matrix T_best,

wherein SVM predictions are performed using the feature matrix T_best that gives a highest best function value.

17. The computer-implemented method of claim 16 , wherein all the feature vectors corresponding to the FP data set are evaluated by calculating a corresponding benefic function and determined to be removed from the T_best or not depending on a value of the corresponding benefic function.

18. The computer-implemented method of claim 11 , wherein the feature vector v is not removed from the feature matrix T_best if the value of the benefit function does not meet the predetermined criterion.

19. The computer-implemented method of claim 11 , wherein the feature vectors are based on faces or objects in images, the computer-implemented method further comprising:

classifying the objects and the faces in the images by performing SVM predictions on the feature matrix T_best.

Assignments (3)
CHANGE OF NAME Recorded Nov 22, 2019
From: SHUTTERFLY, INC.
To: SHUTTERFLY, LLC
Reel/Frame 051095/0172 →
FIRST LIEN SECURITY AGREEMENT Recorded Sep 27, 2019
From: SHUTTERFLY, INC.
To: WILMINGTON TRUST, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION
Reel/Frame 050574/0865 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded May 15, 2019
From: MOUSSAFFI, OMER MOSHE
To: SHUTTERFLY, INC.
Reel/Frame 049184/0930 →