IP Library Granted Patent US 11,429,508
Granted Patent B2
US 11,429,508 · App. 16/230,655 · Granted Aug 30, 2022

Interface for visualizing and improving model performance

Inventors: Arijit Sengupta (San Francisco, CA); Jonathan Wray (San Francisco, CA); Grigory Nudelman (San Francisco, CA); Daniel Kane (San Francisco, CA); Geoffrey Grant (San Francisco, CA)
Assignee: Aible Inc.
G06F11/3447G06F16/9024G06N3/08G06N7/005G06N20/00G06T11/206
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 11,429,508
App. No.
16/230,655
Granted
Aug 30, 2022
Kind
B2
Abstract

A method includes monitoring performance of a generated model while the generated model is being used for classification on live data, the monitoring including determining a first performance value of the generated model at a first point in time and determining a second performance value of the generated model at a second point in time; rendering, within a graphical user interface, a plot including a first axis and a second axis, the first axis including a characterization of a first performance metric and the second axis including a characterization of a second performance metric; and rendering, within the graphical user interface and the plot, a first graphical object at a first location characterizing the first performance value and a second graphical object at a second location characterizing the second performance value. Related apparatus, systems, techniques and articles are also described.

Claims (38)

1. A method comprising:

monitoring performance of a generated model while the generated model is being used for classification on live data, the monitoring including determining a first performance value of the generated model at a first point in time and determining a second performance value of the generated model at a second point in time;

rendering, within a graphical user interface, a plot including a first axis and a second axis, the first axis including a characterization of a first performance metric and the second axis including a characterization of a second performance metric; and

rendering, within the graphical user interface and the plot, a first graphical object at a first location characterizing the first performance value and a second graphical object at a second location characterizing the second performance value.

2. The method of claim 1 , further comprising:

rendering a first line indicative of random model performance, a second line indicative of constant accuracy, and/or a third line indicative of constant cost.

3. The method of claim 1 , wherein the first performance metric includes rate of false positive, count of false positive, cost of false positive, benefit missed by false positive, true positive, benefit of true positive, benefit of minimizing false positive, benefit of maximizing true positive, or a combination thereof;

wherein the second performance metric includes rate of false negative, count of false negative, cost of false negative, benefit missed by false negative, true negative, benefit of true negative, benefit of minimizing false negative, benefit of maximizing true negative, or a combination thereof.

4. The method of claim 1 , further comprising:

rendering a line between the first graphical object and the second graphical object.

5. The method of claim 1 , wherein the monitoring includes determining a third performance value of the generated model at a third point in time; the method further comprising:

rendering, within the graphical user interface and the plot, a third graphical object at a third location characterizing the third performance value.

6. The method of claim 1 , wherein the first graphical object includes a shape and/or color indicative of a characteristic of the generated model, the characteristic including a complexity metric.

7. The method of claim 1 , further comprising:

monitoring performance of a second generated model while the second generated model is being used for classification on live data, the monitoring including determining a third performance value of the second generated model at the first point in time and determining a fourth performance value of the second generated model at the second point in time; and

rendering, within the graphical user interface and the plot, a third graphical object at a third location characterizing the third performance value and a fourth graphical object at a fourth location characterizing the fourth performance value.

8. A system comprising:

at least one processor;

memory storing instructions which, when executed by the at least one processor, causes the at least one processor to perform operations comprising:

monitoring performance of a generated model while the generated model is being used for classification on live data, the monitoring including determining a first performance value of the generated model at a first point in time and determining a second performance value of the generated model at a second point in time;

rendering, within a graphical user interface, a plot including a first axis and a second axis, the first axis including a characterization of a first performance metric and the second axis including a characterization of a second performance metric; and

rendering, within the graphical user interface and the plot, a first graphical object at a first location characterizing the first performance value and a second graphical object at a second location characterizing the second performance value.

9. The system of claim 8 , the operations further comprising:

rendering a first line indicative of random model performance, a second line indicative of constant accuracy, and/or a third line indicative of constant cost.

10. The system of claim 8 , wherein the first performance metric includes rate of false positive, count of false positive, cost of false positive, benefit missed by false positive, true positive, benefit of true positive, benefit of minimizing false positive, benefit of maximizing true positive, or a combination thereof;

wherein the second performance metric includes rate of false negative, count of false negative, cost of false negative, benefit missed by false negative, true negative, benefit of true negative, benefit of minimizing false negative, benefit of maximizing true negative, or a combination thereof.

11. The system of claim 8 , the operations further comprising:

rendering a line between the first graphical object and the second graphical object.

12. The system of claim 8 , wherein the monitoring includes determining a third performance value of the generated model at a third point in time; the method further comprising:

rendering, within the graphical user interface and the plot, a third graphical object at a third location characterizing the third performance value.

13. The system of claim 8 , wherein the first graphical object includes a shape and/or color indicative of a characteristic of the generated model, the characteristic including a complexity metric.

14. The system of claim 8 , the operations further comprising:

monitoring performance of a second generated model while the second generated model is being used for classification on live data, the monitoring including determining a third performance value of the second generated model at the first point in time and determining a fourth performance value of the second generated model at the second point in time; and

rendering, within the graphical user interface and the plot, a third graphical object at a third location characterizing the third performance value and a fourth graphical object at a fourth location characterizing the fourth performance value.

15. A non-transitory computer program product storing instructions, which when executed by at least one processor of at least one computing system, cause the at least one processor to perform operations comprising:

monitoring performance of a generated model while the generated model is being used for classification on live data, the monitoring including determining a first performance value of the generated model at a first point in time and determining a second performance value of the generated model at a second point in time;

rendering, within a graphical user interface, a plot including a first axis and a second axis, the first axis including a characterization of a first performance metric and the second axis including a characterization of a second performance metric; and

rendering, within the graphical user interface and the plot, a first graphical object at a first location characterizing the first performance value and a second graphical object at a second location characterizing the second performance value.

Assignments (1)
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Jan 2, 2019
From: SENGUPTA, ARIJIT; WRAY, JONATHAN; NUDELMAN, GRIGORY; KANE, DANIEL; GRANT, GEOFFREY
To: AIBLE INC.
Reel/Frame 047881/0333 →
Continuity (3)
Continuation 16169208 · Oct 24, 2018
Provisional Application 62745966 · Oct 15, 2018
Related Publication 20200118019A1 · Apr 16, 2020
Cited By (1)
US 12,511,139