IP Library Granted Patent US 10,943,772
Granted Patent B2
US 10,943,772 · App. 16/260,274 · Granted Mar 9, 2021

Refractory metal plates

Inventors: Peter R. Jepson (Newbury, MA); Dincer Bozkaya (Framingham, MA)
Assignee: H.C. STARCK INC.
H01J37/3426B21B1/227B22F3/18C22F1/18C23C14/3414B21B39/04B21B2265/24B21B2267/065B21B2273/02Y10T428/12Y10T428/12014Y10T428/12458
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 10,943,772
App. No.
16/260,274
Granted
Mar 9, 2021
Kind
B2
Abstract

A refractory metal plate is provided. The plate has a center, a thickness, an edge, a top surface and a bottom surface, and has a crystallographic texture (as characterized by through, thickness gradient, banding severity; and variation across the plate, for each of the texture components 100//ND and 111//ND, which is substantially uniform throughout the plate.

Claims (54)

1. A method of forming a refractory metal plate, the method comprising:

(A) providing a refractory metal ingot;

(B) cleaning the ingot;

(C) cutting the ingot to produce a workpiece therefrom;

(D) performing a plurality of process cycles, each process cycle comprising (i) upset forging the workpiece, (ii) forging back the workpiece after upset forging the workpiece, and (iii) annealing the workpiece before or after forging back the workpiece;

(E) cutting the workpiece to produce a plate therefrom;

(F) asymmetrically rolling the plate one or more times at an angle of incline between 2° and 20° relative to horizontal; and

(G) annealing the rolled plate to achieve substantially full recrystallization.

2. The method of claim 1 , further comprising, between steps (D) and (E):

upset forging the workpiece, the workpiece having a first diameter;

forging back the workpiece to a second diameter less than the first diameter;

annealing the workpiece; and

forging back the workpiece to a third diameter less than the second diameter.

3. The method of claim 1 , wherein the angle of incline is between 3° and 7°.

4. The method of claim 1 , wherein the plate is asymmetrically rolled a plurality of times during step (F).

5. The method of claim 4 , wherein the plate is rotated at a predetermined angle about a vertical axis between rolling passes.

6. The method of claim 4 , wherein the plate is flipped between rolling passes.

7. The method of claim 1 , further comprising, after step (G), bonding the plate to a backing plate.

8. The method of claim 1 , wherein, after step (G):

the plate has a crystallographic texture as characterized by through thickness gradient, banding severity, and variation across the plate for at least one of the texture components 100//ND or 111//ND, using electron back-scatter diffraction with a 15 μm step in both the horizontal and vertical directions for each measurement;

an average through-thickness gradient is less than or equal to 6% per mm for 111//ND; and

a maximum through-thickness gradient is less than or equal to 13% per mm for 111//ND.

9. The method of claim 1 , wherein, after step (G):

the plate has a crystallographic texture as characterized by through thickness gradient, banding severity, and variation across the plate for at least one of the texture components 100//ND or 111//ND, using electron back-scatter diffraction with a 15 μm step in both the horizontal and vertical directions for each measurement; and

an average banding severity is less than or equal to 6% per mm for 111//ND.

10. The method of claim 1 , wherein, after step (G):

the plate has a crystallographic texture as characterized by through thickness gradient, banding severity, and variation across the plate for at least one of the texture components 100//ND or 111//ND, using electron back-scatter diffraction with a 15 μm step in both the horizontal and vertical directions for each measurement; and

a maximum banding severity is less than or equal to 8% per mm for 111//ND.

11. A method of forming a refractory metal plate, the method comprising:

(A) cold isostatically pressing a refractory metal powder to a density of 60%-90% to form a preform;

(B) hot isostatically pressing the preform to a density of approximately 100% to form a billet;

(C) annealing the billet;

(D) cutting the billet to produce a plate therefrom;

(E) asymmetrically rolling the plate one or more times at an angle of incline between 2° and 20° relative to horizontal; and

(F) annealing the rolled plate to achieve substantially full recrystallization.

12. The method of claim 11 , wherein the angle of incline is between 3° and 7°.

13. The method of claim 11 , wherein the plate is asymmetrically rolled a plurality of times during step (E).

14. The method of claim 13 , wherein the plate is rotated at a predetermined angle about a vertical axis between rolling passes.

15. The method of claim 13 , wherein the plate is flipped between rolling passes.

16. The method of claim 11 , further comprising, after step (F), bonding the plate to a backing plate.

17. The method of claim 11 , wherein, after step (F):

the plate has a crystallographic texture as characterized by through thickness gradient, banding severity, and variation across the plate for at least one of the texture components 100//ND or 111//ND, using electron back-scatter diffraction with a 15 μm step in both the horizontal and vertical directions for each measurement;

an average through-thickness gradient is less than or equal to 6% per mm for 111//ND; and

a maximum through-thickness gradient is less than or equal to 13% per mm for 111//ND.

18. The method of claim 11 , wherein, after step (F):

the plate has a crystallographic texture as characterized by through thickness gradient, banding severity, and variation across the plate for at least one of the texture components 100//ND or 111//ND, using electron back-scatter diffraction with a 15 μm step in both the horizontal and vertical directions for each measurement; and

an average banding severity is less than or equal to 6% per mm for 111//ND.

19. The method of claim 11 , wherein, after step (F):

the plate has a crystallographic texture as characterized by through thickness gradient, banding severity, and variation across the plate for at least one of the texture components 100//ND or 111//ND, using electron back-scatter diffraction with a 15 μm step in both the horizontal and vertical directions for each measurement; and

a maximum banding severity is less than or equal to 8% per mm for 111//ND.

20. A method of forming a thin film, the method comprising:

providing a refractory metal plate having a center, a thickness, an edge, a top surface, and a bottom surface, the refractory metal plate having a crystallographic texture as characterized by through thickness gradient, banding severity, and variation across the plate for at least one of the texture components 100//ND or 111//ND, using electron back-scatter diffraction with a 15 μm step in both the horizontal and vertical directions for each measurement, wherein (i) an average through-thickness gradient is less than or equal to 6% per mm for 111//ND, and (ii) a maximum through-thickness gradient is less than or equal to 13% per mm for 111//ND;

providing a substrate; and

sputtering the plate to form a film on the substrate, the film comprising the refractory metal.

Assignments (3)
CHANGE OF NAME Recorded Apr 5, 2022
From: H.C. STARCK INC.
To: MATERION NEWTON INC.
Reel/Frame 059596/0925 →
SECURITY INTEREST Recorded Nov 1, 2021
From: H.C. STARCK INC.
To: JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A., AS ADMINISTRATIVE AGENT
Reel/Frame 057978/0970 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Feb 21, 2019
From: JEPSON, PETER R.; BOZKAYA, DINCER
To: H.C. STARCK INC.
Reel/Frame 048391/0323 →