Methods and Systems for Identification, Assessment, Modeling and Repair of Anatomical Disparities in Joint Replacement
Improved systems and methods for deriving anatomical structures from indirect anatomical measurements as well as identifying abnormal, deformed, unusual and/or undesirable anatomical structures, and related improvements in designing and/or selecting patient-adapted (e.g., patient-specific and/or patient-engineered) orthopedic implants and guide tools, as well as related methods, designs, and models.
1 . A method of making an implant component for a joint of a patient, comprising:
obtaining an anatomical dimension associated with the patient, the anatomical dimension including a width of a distal femur at its widest point on its loads bearing surface;
deriving information regarding an anatomical feature of the joint based, at least in part, on the anatomical dimension and an anatomical relationship correlation;
designing an implant component based, at least in part, on the derived information regarding the anatomical feature, wherein the joint is a knee joint, wherein the derived information includes a sagittal J-curve of the knee joint.
2 . The method of claim 1 , wherein the anatomical dimension further comprises a patella width, a patella length, a condyle length, a condyle width, or a femoral notch width of the knee joint.
3 . The method of claim 1 , wherein the anatomical feature comprises at least one of a lateral femoral condyle of the knee joint, a medial femoral condyle of the knee joint, and a patella of the knee joint.
4 . The method of claim 1 , wherein the derived information regarding the anatomical feature of the knee joint comprises at least one of an anterior radius of a femoral condyle, a posterior radius of a femoral condyle, a femur width, a patella width, a patella length, a condyle length, a condyle width, or a femoral notch width of the knee joint.
5 . The method of claim 1 , wherein the anatomical dimension comprises the patient's height.
6 . The method of claim 1 , wherein the anatomical relationship correlation is not patient specific.
7 . The method of claim 1 , wherein the anatomical relationship correlation relates the anatomical dimension to the derived information regarding the anatomical feature.
8 . The method of claim 1 , further comprising selecting the anatomical relationship correlation from a database.
9 . The method of claim 9 , wherein the selecting the anatomical relationship correlation is based, at least in part, on patient-specific information.
10 . The method of claim 9 , wherein the patient-specific information comprises at least one of the patient's age, weight, gender, and race.
11 . The method of claim 1 , wherein the obtaining an anatomical dimension comprises measuring the anatomical dimension directly from an image of the joint.
12 . The method of claim 1 , further comprising using the derived information to estimate at least a portion of a condyle of the knee joint.
13 . The method of claim 1 , further comprising measuring the anatomical feature to determine measured information regarding the anatomical feature and comparing the measured information regarding the anatomical feature to the derived information regarding the anatomical feature.
14 . A method of making an implant component for a joint of a patient, comprising: obtaining an anatomical dimension associated with the patient, the anatomical dimension including a width of a distal femur at its widest point on its loads bearing surface; deriving information regarding an anatomical feature of the joint based, at least in part, on the anatomical dimension and an anatomical relationship correlation; measuring the anatomical feature to determine measured information regarding the anatomical feature; comparing the measured information regarding the anatomical feature to the derived information regarding the anatomical feature; and designing an implant component based, at least in part, on the comparison of the measured information regarding the anatomical feature to the derived information regarding the anatomical feature, wherein the joint is a knee joint, wherein the derived information includes a sagittal J-curve of the knee joint.
15 . The method of claim 14 , wherein if there is substantially no difference between the measured information regarding the anatomical feature and the derived information regarding the anatomical feature, the designing the implant component is based, at least in part, on at least one of the measured information regarding the anatomical feature and the derived information regarding the anatomical feature.
16 . The method of claim 14 , wherein if the measured information regarding the anatomical feature is substantially different from the derived information regarding the anatomical feature, an alert is provided to the designer of the implant.
17 . An implant component for treating a patient's joint, comprising: a joint-facing surface having a patient-adapted curvature in at least one plane; wherein the patient-adapted curvature is based, at least in part, on derived information regarding an anatomical feature of the joint, the derived information being based, at least in part, on a measured anatomical dimension and an anatomical relationship correlation.
18 . The implant component of claim 17 , wherein: the joint is a knee joint; the patient-adapted curvature comprises a J-curve of a condyle; and the measured anatomical dimension comprises a femur width.
19 . The implant component of claim 18 , wherein the derived information regarding the anatomical feature of the knee joint comprises at least one of an anterior radius of a femoral condyle and a posterior radius of a femoral condyle.