IP Library Granted Patent US 10,674,153
Granted Patent B2
US 10,674,153 · App. 16/276,187 · Granted Jun 2, 2020

Image processing device and image processing method

Inventor: Junichi Tanaka (Kanagawa, JP)
Assignee: Velos Media, LLC
H04N19/124H04N19/103H04N19/126H04N19/157H04N19/174H04N19/31H04N19/44H04N19/463H04N19/50H04N19/70
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 10,674,153
App. No.
16/276,187
Granted
Jun 2, 2020
Kind
B2
Abstract

An image processing device including an acquiring section configured to acquire quantization matrix parameters from an encoded stream in which the quantization matrix parameters defining a quantization matrix are set within a parameter set which is different from a sequence parameter set and a picture parameter set, a setting section configured to set, based on the quantization matrix parameters acquired by the acquiring section, a quantization matrix which is used when inversely quantizing data decoded from the encoded stream, and an inverse quantization section configured to inversely quantize the data decoded from the encoded stream using the quantization matrix set by the setting section.

Claims (25)

1. An apparatus, comprising:

at least one processor:

at least one memory including computer program code, the memory and the computer program code configured to, working with the at least one processor, cause the apparatus to perform at least the following:

determine a set of values which are from a reference scaling list based, at least in part on at least one of: a matrix size, a prediction method, and/or a signal component; and,

generate a syntax element, the syntax element indicating whether or not a set of values which are from a scaling list is identical to the set of values which are from the reference scaling list.

2. The apparatus of claim 1 , wherein the matrix size is one of a 4×4 matrix size, an 8×8 matrix size, a 16×16 matrix size, or a 32×32 matrix size.

3. The apparatus of claim 1 , wherein the prediction method is one of an inter prediction method or an intra prediction method.

4. The apparatus of claim 1 , wherein the signal component is one of a Y component, a Cb component, or a Cr component.

5. The apparatus of claim 1 , wherein the set of values comprised by the reference scaling list comprises values from a default scaling list.

6. The apparatus of claim 1 , wherein the set of values comprised by the reference scaling list are further determined based, at least in part, on a value of a matrix ID.

7. A method comprising:

determining a set of values which are from a reference scaling list based, at least in part on at least one of: a matrix size, a prediction method, and/or a signal component; and,

generating a syntax element, the syntax element indicating whether or not a set of values which are from a scaling list is identical to the set of values which are from the reference scaling list.

8. The method of claim 7 , wherein the matrix size is one of a 4×4 matrix size, an 8×8 matrix size, a 16×16 matrix size, or a 32×32 matrix size.

9. The method of claim 7 , wherein the prediction method is one of an inter prediction method or an intra prediction method.

10. The method of claim 7 , wherein the signal component is one of a Y component, a Cb component, or a Cr component.

11. The method of claim 7 , wherein the set of values comprised by the reference scaling list comprises values from a default scaling list.

12. The method of claim 7 , wherein the values of the reference scaling list are further determined based, at least in part, on the value of a matrix ID.

13. At least one computer-readable medium encoded with instructions that, when executed by a processor, perform:

determining a set of values which are from a reference scaling list based, at least in part on at least one of: a matrix size, a prediction method, and/or a signal component; and,

generating a syntax element, the syntax element indicating whether or not a set of values which are from a scaling list is identical to the set of values which are from the reference scaling list.

14. The computer-readable medium of claim 13 , wherein the matrix size is one of a 4×4 matrix size, an 8×8 matrix size, a 16×16 matrix size, or a 32×32 matrix size.

15. The computer-readable medium of claim 13 , wherein the prediction method is one of an inter prediction method or an intra prediction method.

16. The computer-readable medium of claim 13 , wherein the signal component is one of a Y component, a Cb component, or a Cr component.

17. The computer-readable medium of claim 13 , wherein the set of values comprised by the reference scaling list comprises values from a default scaling list.

Assignments (4)
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Nov 9, 2022
From: VELOS MEDIA, LLC
To: SONY GROUP CORPORATION
Reel/Frame 061902/0867 →
RELEASE OF SECURITY INTEREST Recorded Jul 26, 2022
From: CORTLAND CAPITAL MARKET SERVICES LLC
To: VELOS MEDIA, LLC AND VELOS MEDIA MANAGEMENT, LLC
Reel/Frame 060923/0407 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Mar 14, 2019
From: TANAKA, JUNICHI
To: SONY CORPORATION
Reel/Frame 048592/0091 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Mar 14, 2019
From: SONY CORPORATION
To: VELOS MEDIA, LLC
Reel/Frame 048592/0156 →
Priority Claims (3)
JP 2011-027896 · Feb 10, 2011 · national
JP 2011-047655 · Mar 4, 2011 · national
JP 2011-187179 · Aug 30, 2011 · national
Continuity (3)
Continuation 15642531 · Jul 6, 2017
Continuation 13990489
Related Publication 20190182485A1 · Jun 13, 2019