IP Library Granted Patent US 11,432,888
Granted Patent B2
US 11,432,888 · App. 16/294,442 · Granted Sep 6, 2022

Method and system for moving a plurality of articulated instruments in tandem back towards an entry guide

Inventors: Nicola Diolaiti (Menlo Park, CA); Paul E. Lilagan (Sunnyvale, CA)
Assignee: INTUITIVE SURGICAL OPERATIONS, INC.
A61B34/30A61B17/00234A61B34/72A61B34/76B25J13/025B25J19/021A61B34/20A61B2017/3447A61B2034/301
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 11,432,888
App. No.
16/294,442
Filed
Mar 6, 2019
Granted
Sep 6, 2022
Kind
B2
Examiner
LI, CE LI
Art Unit
3661
USPC
700/245
Abstract

A medical robotic system includes articulated instruments extending out of a distal end of an entry guide. Prior to pivoting the entry guide to re-orient it and the instruments, the instruments are moved in tandem back towards the entry guide after a delay. Haptic cues and velocity limits are provided to assist the operator in the retraction of the instruments. After retraction, the entry guide may then be pivoted without concern that the instruments will harm patient anatomy. The movement of the instruments in tandem back towards the entry guide may also occur through coupled control modes while the entry guide is held in a fixed position and orientation.

Claims (60)

1. A method for retracting an articulated instrument into an entry guide, the articulated instrument having a plurality of rotational joints and a plurality of links, each rotational joint of the plurality of rotational joints coupling together an adjacent pair of the plurality of links, a most proximal link of the plurality of links at least partially disposed inside the entry guide, the method comprising:

receiving, by a processor, a retraction command from an input device, the retraction command commanding translational movement of the most proximal link towards a proximal end of the entry guide;

determining, by the processor, a joint of the plurality of rotational joints that is outside of the entry guide and closest to a distal end of the entry guide as a most proximal rotational joint;

causing, by the processor, movement of the most proximal link towards the proximal end of the entry guide in response to the retraction command, wherein the movement of the most proximal link towards the proximal end of the entry guide causes movement of the most proximal rotational joint towards the distal end of the entry guide;

actuating, by the processor after the most proximal rotational joint reaches a minimum distance from the distal end of the entry guide, the most proximal joint so that the adjacent pair of the plurality of links coupled by the most proximal rotational joint is reconfigured to allow the adjacent pair to be disposed within the entry guide; and

causing, by the processor when the adjacent pair reaches a configuration that can be disposed within the entry guide, further movement of the most proximal link towards the proximal end of the entry guide.

2. The method of claim 1 , further comprising:

determining, by the processor, the minimum distance by using at least one of the following factors:

a velocity of movement of the most proximal link in response to the retraction command, so that the minimum distance increases as the velocity increases; or

an angle between the adjacent pair of the plurality of links coupled by the most proximal rotational joint, so that the minimum distance decreases as at least one of respective longitudinal axes of the adjacent pair increasingly align with each other and as an extended length of the adjacent pair increases.

3. The method of claim 1 , further comprising delaying, by the processor, after the most proximal rotational joint reaches the minimum distance and before actuating the most proximal rotational joint so that the adjacent pair is reconfigured to allow the pair to be disposed within the entry guide.

4. The method of claim 3 , further comprising:

causing, by the processor, an abrupt change, after the delaying, to a haptic force being applied against the input device, followed by a force profile.

5. The method of claim 3 , further comprising:

receiving, by the processor, a sequence of retraction commands from the input device; and

causing, by the processor, a haptic force to be applied against the input device, so that the haptic force progressively increases as the sequence of retraction commands command movements of the most proximal link that progressively exceed a limit distance, the limit distance being from an initial position of the most proximal link when receiving a first retraction command in the sequence of retraction commands.

6. The method of claim 5 , further comprising:

receiving, by the processor, a second retraction command among the sequence of retraction commands from the input device, the second retraction command commanding translational movement of the most proximal link towards the proximal end of the entry guide by a distance exceeding a locking distance from the initial position; and

causing, by the processor, at least one joint used to pivot the entry guide to be locked in place upon receiving the second retraction command.

7. The method of claim 6 , further comprising:

causing, by the processor, the at least one joint used for pivoting the entry guide to be unlocked after the articulated instrument has been retracted into the entry guide.

8. The method of claim 5 , further comprising:

causing, by the processor, the most proximal link to move towards the proximal end of the entry guide in response to the sequence of retraction commands subject to a progressively increasing velocity limit, after the delaying, as commanded movement of the most proximal link progressively increases.

9. The method of claim 8 , wherein causing the most proximal link to move towards the proximal end of the entry guide in response to the sequence of retraction commands, is further subject to a maximum velocity limit after a third retraction command exceeds a maximum commanded distance after the delaying, wherein the third retraction command is one of the sequence of retraction commands.

10. A robotic system comprising:

an input device;

an entry guide manipulator coupleable to an entry guide; and

an instrument manipulator coupleable to an articulated instrument, the articulated instrument having a plurality of rotational joints and a plurality of links, each rotational joint of the plurality of rotational joints coupling together an adjacent pair of the plurality of links;

wherein the robotic system is configured to:

receive a retraction command from the input device, the retraction command commanding translational movement of a most proximal link of the plurality of links towards a proximal end of the entry guide;

determine, as a most proximal rotational joint of the articulated instrument, a joint of the plurality of rotational joints that is outside of the entry guide and closest to a distal end of the entry guide;

determine whether the most proximal rotational joint is within a minimum distance from the distal end of the entry guide;

conditioned upon determining that the most proximal rotational joint is not within the minimum distance from the distal end of the entry guide, command the instrument manipulator to move the most proximal link towards the proximal end of the entry guide in response to the retraction command; and

conditioned upon determining that the most proximal rotational joint is within the minimum distance from the distal end of the entry guide:

determine whether an adjacent pair of the plurality of links coupled by the most proximal rotational joint, can be disposed as configured within the entry guide,

conditioned upon determining that the adjacent pair can be disposed as configured within the entry guide, command the instrument manipulator to move the most proximal link towards the proximal end of the entry guide in response to the retraction command, and

conditioned upon determining that the adjacent pair cannot be disposed as configured within the entry guide, command the instrument manipulator to actuate the most proximal rotational joint so that the adjacent pair coupled to the most proximal rotational joint is reconfigured to allow the adjacent pair to be disposed within the entry guide, before commanding the instrument manipulator to move the most proximal link towards the proximal end of the entry guide in response to the retraction command.

11. The robotic system of claim 10 , wherein the robotic system is further configured to:

determine the minimum distance by using at least one of the following factors:

a velocity of movement of the most proximal link in response to the retraction command; or

an angle between the adjacent pair of the plurality of links coupled by the most proximal rotational joint.

12. The robotic system of claim 11 , wherein the robotic system is configured to determine the minimum distance by using at least the velocity of movement of the most proximal link in response to the retraction command, such that the minimum distance increases as the velocity increases.

13. The robotic system of claim 11 , wherein the robotic system is configured to determine the minimum distance by using at least the angle between the adjacent pair, such that the minimum distance decreases as respective longitudinal axes of the adjacent pair increasingly align with each other.

14. The robotic system of claim 10 , wherein the robotic system is further configured to:

conditioned upon determining that the most proximal rotational joint is within the minimum distance from the distal end of the entry guide, delay before commanding the instrument manipulator to actuate the most proximal rotational joint so that the adjacent pair coupled to the most proximal rotational joint can be disposed within the entry guide, the delay indicated by one of a counter or a low pass filter.

15. The robotic system of claim 14 , wherein the robotic system is further configured to:

cause an abrupt change, after the delay, to a haptic force being applied against the input device, followed by a force profile.

16. The robotic system of claim 14 , wherein the robotic system is further configured to:

receive a sequence of retraction commands from the input device; and

cause a haptic force to be applied against the input device so that the haptic force progressively increases as the sequence of retraction commands command movements of the most proximal link that progressively exceed a limit distance, the limit distance being from an initial position of the most proximal link when receiving a first retraction command in the sequence of retraction commands.

17. The robotic system of claim 16 , wherein the robotic system is further configured to:

receive a second retraction command among the sequence of retraction commands from the input device, the second retraction command commanding translational movement of the most proximal link towards the proximal end of the entry guide by a distance exceeding a locking distance from the initial position; and

command the entry guide manipulator to lock in place at least one joint used to pivot the entry guide, upon receiving the second retraction command.

18. The robotic system of claim 17 , wherein the robotic system is further configured to:

command the entry guide manipulator to unlock the at least one joint used for pivoting the entry guide, after the articulated instrument has been retracted into the entry guide.

19. The robotic system of claim 16 , wherein the robotic system is further configured to:

command the instrument manipulator to move the most proximal link towards the proximal end of the entry guide in response to the sequence of retraction commands subject to, after the delay, a progressively increasing velocity limit as commanded movement of the most proximal link progressively increases.

20. The robotic system of claim 19 , wherein the robotic system is further configured to:

command the instrument manipulator to move the most proximal link towards the proximal end of the entry guide in response to the sequence of retraction commands further subject to a maximum velocity limit after a third retraction command exceeds a maximum commanded distance after the delay,

wherein the third retraction command is one of the sequence of retraction commands.

Assignments (2)
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Jun 24, 2022
From: DIOLAITI, NICOLA; LILAGAN, PAUL E.
To: INTUITIVE SURGICAL OPERATIONS, INC.
Reel/Frame 060311/0690 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded May 31, 2022
From: DIOLAITI, NICOLA
To: INTUITIVE SURGICAL, INC.
Reel/Frame 060060/0797 →
Continuity (9)
Continuation 15258049 · Sep 7, 2016
Division 13789329 · Mar 7, 2013
Continuation In Part 13294403 · Nov 11, 2011
Continuation In Part 12780071 · May 14, 2010
Continuation In Part 11762200 · Jun 13, 2007
Continuation In Part 12489566 · Jun 23, 2009
Continuation In Part 12613328 · Nov 5, 2009
Continuation In Part 12541913 · Aug 15, 2009
Related Publication 20190201134A1 · Jul 4, 2019
Cited By (20)
US 1,087,135 US 1,087,995 US 12,239,396 US 12,266,040 US 12,295,681 US 12,357,400 US 12,376,934 US 12,465,447 US 12,479,098 US 12,496,728 US 12,599,445 US 12,599,449 US 12,611,272 US 12,616,474 US 12,617,078 US 12,642,613 US 12,648,685 US 12,661,192 US 12,672,927 US 12,708,466