IP Library Granted Patent US 12,315,601
Granted Patent B2
US 12,315,601 · App. 16/308,386 · Granted May 27, 2025

Linear genome assembly from three dimensional genome structure

Inventors: Erez Aiden (Houston, TX); Olga Dudchenko (Houston, GA); Aviva Aiden (Houston, TX); Elena Stamenova (Cambridge, MA); Sanjit Singh Batra (Houston, TX); Arina Omer (Houston, TX); Per Aspera Adastra (Houston, TX); Neva Durand (Houston, TX); Maxim Massenkoff (Cambridge, MA); Sarah Nyquist (Cambridge, MA); Anthony Tzen (Houston, TX); Christopher Lui (Houston, TX); Melanie Pham (Houston, TX); Eric Lander (Cambridge, MA)
Assignees: THE BROAD INSTITUTE, INC.; BAYLOR COLLEGE OF MEDICINE
G16B5/10C12Q1/6869G16B15/10G16B30/20
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 12,315,601
App. No.
16/308,386
Granted
May 27, 2025
Kind
B2
Abstract

Embodiments provide a method for sequencing and assembling long DNA genomes comprising generating a 3D contact map of chromatin loop structures in a target genome, the 3D contact map of chromatin loop structures defining spatial proximity relationships between genomic loci in the genome, and deriving a linear genomic nucleic acid sequence from the 3D map of chromatin loop structures.

Claims (65)

1. A method for assembly of one or more long DNA molecules comprising:

a) performing a DNA proximity ligation assay conducted on one or more samples;

b) generating a draft assembly of contigs and scaffolds from input sequencing reads obtained, at least in part, from the DNA proximity ligation assay conducted on one or more samples;

c) assembling larger sequences corresponding to one or more DNA molecules in the one or more samples by iteratively overlapping, ordering, orienting, and merging the contigs and scaffolds in the draft assembly, wherein assembling larger sequences is determined, at least in part, by application of a greedy algorithm, an optimization algorithm, or a manual annotation algorithm;

d) performing misjoin correction on the scaffolds, wherein the misjoin correction uses contact frequency between sequences in the scaffolds generated from a contact matrix to determine one or more misjoins;

e) generating one or more megascaffolds from the corrected scaffolds, wherein generating one or more megascaffolds comprises using a density graph to construct hemi-scaffolds from the corrected scaffolds and transforming the density graph into a confidence graph, the confidence graph constructs one or more megascaffolds from the hemi-scaffolds; and

f) generating a final assembly from the megascaffolds.

2. The method of claim 1 , wherein assembling the input sequencing reads, which forms a set, is determined, at least in part, based on a frequency at which all or part of a given sequence forms contact with other sequences and a given sequencing read forms contact with other sequencing reads in the set.

3. The method of claim 2 is wherein a part of a given se.

4. The method of claim 1 , wherein assembling the input sequence is determined, at least in part, based on a relative orientation with which a given sequence forms contacts with other input sequences.

5. The method of claim 4 , wherein the orientation is inner, outer, left, or right.

6. The method of claim 1 , wherein;

the input sequencing reads are:

contigs, scaffolds, or a combination thereof;

generated using short-read sequencing technology, long-read sequencing technology, insert clones, linkage mapping data, physical mapping data, optical mapping data, or a combination thereof;

from a single organism or multiple organisms; or

from multiple organisms, and the multiple organisms are from a same or different species; or

a combination thereof;

the one or more DNA molecules are chromosomes, portions of chromosomes, plasmids, or other nucleotide sequences;

consecutive sequences in the assembly are merged to increase contiguity of the assembly;

the DNA proximity ligation assay is Hi-C; or

a combination thereof.

7. The method of claim 1 , wherein assembling the input sequences is performed, at least in part, based on analyzing the sequences of the contigs and scaffolds.

8. The method of claim 7 , wherein flanking sequences of the sequences of the contigs and scaffolds are analyzed.

9. The method of claim 1 , further comprising assembling a draft assembly prior to generating the final assembly.

10. The method of claim 9 , further comprising identifying neighboring contigs in the draft assembly, wherein the neighboring contig is a contig and/or scaffold located within a given linear genomic distance according to the draft assembly.

11. The method of claim 1 , further comprising identifying different sub-compartments with different distance scaling and long range contact pattern based on massively multiplex single cell DNA-DNA proximity ligation assay.

12. The method of claim 11 , wherein:

DNA-DNA proximity ligation data from different subsets is used for different assembly related tasks, optionally wherein the assembly related tasks comprise of misassembly detection or contig ordering;

DNA-DNA proximity ligation data from different subsets is used to perform tasks at different scales, optionally wherein the scales comprise of kilobase or megabase; or

a Hi-C ligation protocol is performed on synchronized populations of cells.

13. The method of claim 1 , wherein a Hi-C ligation protocol is performed on one or more cells that have been treated to modify genome folding.

14. The method of claim 13 , where the treatment to modify genome folding is gene editing.

15. The method of claim 14 , where the gene editing method is CRISPR or TALEN.

16. The method of claim 1 , to assemble transcriptomes, thus generating a draft assembly.

17. The method of claim 16 , wherein the draft assembly spans sequences of genes associated with RNA transcripts found in a cell.

18. The method of claim 17 , wherein the final assembly performs one or more following tasks:

assigning genes to chromosomes;

determining the order and orientation of the genes; and

estimating distances between genes.

19. The method of claim 1 , wherein the one or more DNA molecules do not correspond to genes.

20. The method of claim 1 , where bisulfite treatment is applied to ligation products derived from a proximity ligation experiment.

21. The method of claim 20 , wherein the final assembly is used to:

analyze proximity between DNA loci in a sample;

determine a frequency of methylation for one or more bases in a sample; or

determine whether one or more loci tend to be methylated simultaneously.

22. The method of claim 1 , wherein the DNA proximity ligation assay is used to generate a 3D contact map, the 3D contact map defines one or more contact domains.

23. The method of claim 22 , wherein the 3D contact map defines:

one or more loops;

one or more compartments;

one or more superloops;

one or more compartment interactions;

other 3D features;

centromere and telomere regions; or

a combination thereof.

24. A method for genome assembly comprising:

a) performing a DNA proximity ligation assay;

b) generating a draft assembly of contigs and scaffolds from input sequencing reads obtained, at least in part, the DNA proximity ligation assay conducted on one or more samples;

c) assembling larger sequences corresponding to one or more DNA molecules in the one or more samples by iteratively overlapping, ordering, orienting, and merging the contigs and scaffolds in the draft assembly, wherein a proper orientation of contigs and/or scaffolds is determined, at least in part, by 3D contact features, wherein the features in question are centromere-to-centromere interactions, telomere-to-telomere interactions and centromere-to-telomere interactions or a combination thereof;

d) performing misjoin correction on the scaffolds, wherein the misjoin correction uses contact frequency between sequences in the scaffolds generated from a contact matrix to determine one or more misjoin; and

e) generating one or more megascaffolds from the corrected scaffolds, wherein generating one or more megascaffolds comprises using a density graph to construct hemi-scaffolds from the corrected scaffolds and transforming the density graph into a confidence graph, the confidence graph constructs one or more megascaffolds from the hemi-scaffolds,

the contact features are determined, at least in part, by data from the DNA proximity ligation assay.

25. The method of claim 24 , wherein:

contacts associated with the reads correspond to one or more pixels in a contact map; or

a combination thereof.

Assignments (12)
CORRECTIVE ASSIGNMENT TO CORRECT THE NAME OF THE INVENTOR PREVIOUSLY RECORDED AT REEL: 51705 FRAME: 887. ASSIGNOR(S) HEREBY CONFIRMS THE ASSIGNMENT . Recorded Feb 11, 2025
From: ADASTRA, PER ASPERA
To: BAYLOR COLLEGE OF MEDICINE
Reel/Frame 070176/0316 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Jul 30, 2021
From: MASSENKOFF, MAXIM
To: THE BROAD INSTITUTE, INC.
Reel/Frame 057036/0923 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Jul 31, 2020
From: AIDEN, EREZ
To: BAYLOR COLLEGE OF MEDICINE
Reel/Frame 053375/0147 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Jul 31, 2020
From: DUDCHENKO, OLGA
To: BAYLOR COLLEGE OF MEDICINE
Reel/Frame 053375/0179 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Jul 31, 2020
From: AIDEN, AVIVA
To: BAYLOR COLLEGE OF MEDICINE
Reel/Frame 053376/0041 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Jul 12, 2020
From: LUI, CHRISTOPHER
To: BAYLOR COLLEGE OF MEDICINE
Reel/Frame 053183/0807 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Jul 12, 2020
From: TZEN, ANTHONY
To: BAYLOR COLLEGE OF MEDICINE
Reel/Frame 053183/0812 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Apr 20, 2020
From: OMER, ARINA
To: BAYLOR COLLEGE OF MEDICINE
Reel/Frame 052447/0656 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Apr 20, 2020
From: DURAND, NEVA
To: BAYLOR COLLEGE OF MEDICINE
Reel/Frame 052447/0670 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Mar 31, 2020
From: BATRA, SANJIT SINGH
To: BAYLOR COLLEGE OF MEDICINE
Reel/Frame 052278/0816 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Feb 3, 2020
From: GLENN ST HILAIRE, BRIAN TYLER
To: BAYLOR COLLEGE OF MEDICINE
Reel/Frame 051705/0887 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded May 8, 2019
From: LANDER, ERIC
To: THE BROAD INSTITUTE, INC.
Reel/Frame 049120/0860 →
Continuity (5)
Provisional Application 62347605 · Jun 8, 2016
Provisional Application 62475808 · Mar 23, 2017
Provisional Application 62471777 · Mar 15, 2017
Provisional Application 62374475 · Aug 12, 2016
Related Publication 20190385703A1 · Dec 19, 2019
References Cited (43)
US 20160246922A1 · Putnam · 2016 [cited by examiner]
US 20230002823A1 · Porreca · 2023 [cited by examiner]
WO WO2010036323A1 · 2010 [cited by examiner]
WO WO2014127414A1 · 2014 [cited by examiner]
WO 2015010051A1 · 2015 [cited by applicant]
WO 2015197711A1 · 2015 [cited by applicant]
WO WO2017011710A2 · 2017 [cited by examiner]
WO 2017031370A1 · 2017 [cited by applicant]
Barutcu et al. C-ing the Genome: A Compendium of Chromosome Conformation Capture Methods to Study Higher-Order Chromatin Organization Journal of Cellular Physiology vol. 231, pp. 31-35 (Year: 2015). [cited by examiner]
Myers et al. A Whole-Genome Assembly of [cited by examiner]
Burton et al. Chromosome-scale scaffolding of de novo genome assemblies based on chromatin interactions Nature Biotechnology vol. 31, pp. 1119-1125 and online methods and supplementary material (Year: 2013). [cited by examiner]
Sanborn et al. Chromatin extrusion explains key features of loop and domain formation in wild-type and engineered genomes Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA vol. 112, pp. E6456-E6465 (Year: 2015). [cited by examiner]
Seitan et al. Cohsesin-based chromatin interactions enable regulated gene expression within preexisting architectural compartments Genome Research vol. 23 pp. 2066-2077 (Year: 2013). [cited by examiner]
Lun et al. diffHic: a Bioconductor package to detect differential genomic interactions in Hi—C data BMC Bioinformatics vol. 16 article 258 (Year: 2015). [cited by examiner]
Pop et al. Bioinformatics challenges of new sequencing technology Trends in Genetics vol. 24 pp. 142-149 (Year: 2008). [cited by examiner]
Gnerre et al. High-quality draft assemblies of mammalian genomes from massively parallel sequence data Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA vol. 108 pp. 1513-1518 (Year: 2011). [cited by examiner]
Varoquaux et al. Accurate identification of centromere locations in yeast genomes using Hi—C Nucleic Acids Research vol. 43 pp. 5331-5339 (Year: 2015). [cited by examiner]
Naumova et al. Organization of the Mitotic Chromosome Sciennce vol. 342 pp. 948-953 (Year: 2013). [cited by examiner]
Fraser, James, et al. “An overview of genome organization and how we got there: from FISH to Hi—C.” Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews 79.3 (2015): 347-372. (Year: 2015). [cited by examiner]
Wang, Jingjing, et al. “Exploring the mechanisms of genome-wide long-range interactions: interpreting chromosome organization.” Briefings in functional genomics 15.5 (2016): 385-395. (Year: 2015). [cited by examiner]
Schwartzman, Omer, and Amos Tanay. “Single-cell epigenomics: techniques and emerging applications.” Nature Reviews Genetics 16.12 (2015): 716-726. (Year: 2015). [cited by examiner]
Silva, GZ, et al., “Combining de novo and reference-guided assembly with scaffold_builder”, Source Code for Biology and Medicine, vol. 8, No. 1, pp. 1-5, Published: Nov. 22, 2013. [cited by applicant]
Williamson, Iain, et al., “Spatial genome organization: contrasting views from chromosome conformation capture and fluorescence in situ hybridization”, Genes and Development, vol. 28, No. 24, pp. 2778-2791, Revised vers… [cited by applicant]
Berkum, NL, et al., “Hi—C: A Method to Study the Three-dimensional Architecture of Genomes.”, Journal of Visualized Experiments, vol. 39, e1869, pp. 1-7, May 6, 2010. [cited by applicant]
Sato, Yukuto, et al., “SUGAR: graphical user interface-based data refiner for high-throughput DNA sequencing”, BMC Genomics, vol. No. 15: No. 664, pp. 1-5, Aug. 8, 2014. [cited by applicant]
Duvick, Jon, et al., “xGDBvm: A Web GUI-Driven Workflow for Annotating Eukaryotic Genomes in the Cloud”, Plant Cell, vol. No. 25 : No. 4, pp. 840-854, Published Mar. 28, 2016. [cited by applicant]
Jiang, Yanliang, et al., “Generation of Physical Map Contig-Specific Sequences Useful for Whole Genome Sequence Scaffolding”, PLOS One, vol. 8 : Issue 10, e78872, pp. 1-9, Published: Oct. 24, 2013. [cited by applicant]
Li, Heng, “FermiKit: assembly-based variant calling for Illumina resequencing data”, Bioinformatics, vol. No. 31 : No. 22, pp. 3694-3696, Accepted on Jul. 22, 2015. [cited by applicant]
Ramani, Vijay, et al., “High-throughput determination of rNA structure by proximity ligation”, Nature Biotechnology, vol. 33 : No. 9, pp. 1-18, Sep. 2015. [cited by applicant]
Nguyen, Richard, et al., “Quantifying Spillover Spreading for Comparing Instrument Performance and Aiding in Multicolor Panel Design”, Cytometry Part A, vol. No. 83A : No. 3, pp. 1-17, Feb. 6, 2013. [cited by applicant]
International Search Report issued by the United States Patent and Trademark Office for PCT/US2017/036649 on Nov. 8, 2017. [cited by applicant]
Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority issued by the United States Patent and Trademark Office for PCT/US2017/036649 on Nov. 8, 2017. [cited by applicant]
Invitation to Pay Additional Fees for PCT International Application No. PCT/US2017/036649. [cited by applicant]
International Preliminary Report on Patentability, issued by the U.S. Patent Office for PCT/US2017/036649 on Nov. 8, 2017. [cited by applicant]
Barutcu et al., “C-ing the Genome: A Compendium of Chromosome Conformation Capture Methods to Study Higher-Order Chromatin Organization”, J Cell Physiol. Jan. 2016 vol. 231(1), pp. 31-35. doi: 10.1002/jcp.25062. PMID: 2… [cited by applicant]
Bickhart et al., “Single-molecule sequencing and conformational capture enable de novo mammalian reference genomes”, bioRxiv, 064352, pp. 1-31, Published: Jul. 18, 2016. [cited by applicant]
Burton et al., “chromosome-scale scaffolding of de novo genome assemblies based on chromatin interactions”, Nature Biotechnology, vol. 31, No. 2, pp. 1119-1127, Published online: Nov. 3, 2013. [cited by applicant]
Love et al., “Evaluation of DISCOVAR de novo using a mosquito sample for cost-effective short-read genome assembly”, BMC Genomics, vol. 17, No. 187, 2016. [cited by applicant]
Marie-Nelly et al., “High-quality genome (re)assembly using chromosomal contact data”, Nature Communication, vol. 5, No. 5695, pp. 1-10, Published: Dec. 17, 2014. [cited by applicant]
Myers et al., “A Whole-Genome Assembly of [cited by applicant]
Pendleton et al., “Assembly and diploid architecture of an individual human genome via single-molecule technologies”, Nat Methods, vol. 12, No. 8, pp. 780-786, Aug. 2015. [cited by applicant]
Putnam et al., “Chromosome-scale shotgun assembly using an in vitro method for long-range linkage”, Genome Research, vol. 26, pp. 342-350, 2016. [cited by applicant]
Sessions et al., “Genome evolution in the allotetraploid frog [cited by applicant]