IP Library Granted Patent US 12,333,783
Granted Patent B2
US 12,333,783 · App. 16/316,432 · Granted Jun 17, 2025

System and method for ultrasound spine shadow feature detection and imaging thereof

Inventors: Frank William Mauldin, Jr. (Charlottesville, VA); Adam Dixon (Charlottesville, VA)
Assignee: Rivanna Medical, Inc.
G06V10/764A61B8/0841A61B8/085A61B8/0875A61B8/5207A61B8/5246G06F18/24G06V20/653A61B8/4427G06T7/12G06T7/13G06V2201/03G16H30/40
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 12,333,783
App. No.
16/316,432
Granted
Jun 17, 2025
Kind
B2
Abstract

Systems and methods for anatomical identification using ultrasonic imaging and acoustic shadow detection methods are provided. At least some embodiments of the disclosure comprise the following steps: acquiring ultrasound image; detecting shadow region; extracting shadow profile; filtering shadow profile with matched filter; identifying anatomical landmarks within shadow; extracting features of anatomical landmarks; classifying anatomy, and determining with a high degree of confidence that the target anatomy is depicted in the image. A determination is made as to the degree of confidence that the target anatomy is depicted in the image. Conditionally, graphics indicating presence and position of target anatomy is displayed including disposition, location and orientation thereof.

Claims (62)

1. A method, comprising:

obtaining, by a processor, ultrasound data generated based on one or more ultrasound signals from an imaged region of a subject;

determining, by the processor, a shadow profile based on:

(1) creating a shadow intensity image from the ultrasound data by calculating a weighted integrated sum of ultrasound data of a plurality of depth samples having values greater in depth than a current depth sample plus an offset, wherein the offset is greater than zero, and wherein the plurality of depth samples used to calculate the weighted integrated sum change depending on a depth or depths of the ultrasound data of the plurality of depth samples; and

(2) determining from each A-line of a plurality of A-lines of the shadow intensity image a depth corresponding to a location of a boundary between a shadow region and tissue;

convolving, by the processor, the shadow profile with a matched shadow profile filter approximating a location or locations of one or more known anatomical landmarks, thereby creating a filtered shadow profile;

identifying, by the processor, an anatomical landmark present in the filtered shadow profile by using at least one of a most prominent peak or a subpeak of the most prominent peak located in the shadow profile;

classifying, by the processor, the anatomical landmark using the at least one or more of the most prominent peak or the subpeak of the most prominent peak located in the shadow profile;

displaying, on a display of a handheld ultrasound imager, a composite image based on the ultrasound data and based on the identified and classified anatomical landmark; and

performing a probe insertion procedure based on the displayed composite image.

2. The method of claim 1 , wherein said identifying the anatomical landmark present in the imaged region comprises:

receiving information indicative of a target anatomy;

determining an anticipated shadow based on the information indicative of the target anatomy; and

identifying, based on the shadow profile and the anticipated shadow, the anatomical landmark present in the imaged region.

3. The method of claim 1 , wherein said identifying the anatomical landmark present in the imaged region comprises:

identifying a feature in the shadow profile; and

classifying the feature in the shadow profile as a specific anatomical landmark, for example, a midline.

4. The method of claim 3 , wherein the specific anatomical landmark is a midline.

5. The method of claim 3 , further comprising:

identifying a second feature in the shadow profile; and

comparing the feature and the second feature in the shadow profile.

6. The method of claim 5 , wherein the comparing the feature in the shadow profile and the second feature in the shadow profile comprises:

determining a metric for the feature in the shadow profile;

determining a metric for the second feature in the shadow profile; and

comparing the metric for the feature in the shadow profile and the metric for the second feature in the shadow profile.

7. The method of claim 6 , wherein the comparing the metric for the feature in the shadow profile and the metric for the second feature in the shadow profile comprises:

determining a difference of the metric for the feature in the shadow profile and the metric for the second feature in the shadow profile.

8. The method of claim 6 , wherein the comparing the metric for the feature in the shadow profile and the metric for the second feature in the shadow profile comprises:

determining a ratio of the metric for the feature in the shadow profile and the metric for the second feature in the shadow profile.

9. The method of claim 1 , wherein the one or more ultrasound signals comprise at least one of the plurality of A-lines, a received echo signal, a radiofrequency signal, a digitized radiofrequency signal, a pulse echo signal, an acoustic reflection line, and a transmit receive line.

10. A system for displaying a composite ultrasound image to guide insertion of a probe into a subject's cavity, the system comprising:

a handheld ultrasound imager;

a probe;

at least one computer hardware processor configured to perform:

obtaining ultrasound data generated based on one or more ultrasound signals from an imaged region of a subject;

determining a shadow profile based on:

(1) creating a shadow intensity image from the ultrasound data by calculating a weighted integrated sum of ultrasound data of a plurality of depth samples having values greater in depth than a current depth sample plus an offset, wherein the offset is greater than zero, and wherein the plurality of depth samples used to calculate the weighted integrated sum change depending on a depth or depths of the ultrasound data of the plurality of depth samples; and

(2) determining from each A-line of a plurality of A-lines of the shadow intensity image a depth corresponding to a location of a boundary between a shadow region and tissue;

convolving the shadow profile with a matched shadow profile filter approximating a location or locations of one or more known anatomical landmarks, thereby creating a filtered shadow profile;

identifying an anatomical landmark present in the filtered shadow profile by using at least one of a most prominent peak or a subpeak of the most prominent peak located in the shadow profile;

classifying the anatomical landmark using the at least one or more of the most prominent peak or the subpeak of the most prominent peak located in the shadow profile;

using the handheld ultrasound imager to display a composite ultrasound image based on the ultrasound data and based on the identification and classification of the anatomical landmark; and

using the displayed composite ultrasound image to guide insertion of the probe into the subject's cavity.

11. The system of claim 10 , wherein said identifying the anatomical landmark present in the imaged region comprises:

filtering the shadow profile; and

identifying, based on the filtered shadow profile, the anatomical landmark present in the imaged region.

12. The system of claim 10 , wherein said determining the shadow profile based on the ultrasound data comprises:

determining shadow intensity data based on the ultrasound data; and

determining the shadow profile based on non-linear processing of the shadow intensity data.

13. The system of claim 10 , wherein said identifying the anatomical landmark present in the imaged region comprises:

receiving information indicative of a target anatomy;

determining an anticipated shadow based on the information indicative of the target anatomy;

determining a measure of similarity between the shadow profile and the anticipated shadow; and

identifying, based on the measure of similarity between the shadow profile and the anticipated shadow, the anatomical landmark present in the imaged region.

14. The system of claim 10 , wherein said identifying the anatomical landmark present in the imaged region comprises:

receiving information indicative of a target anatomy;

determining an anticipated shadow based on the information indicative of the target anatomy; and

identifying, based on the shadow profile and the anticipated shadow, the anatomical landmark present in the imaged region.

15. The system of claim 10 , wherein said identifying the anatomical landmark present in the imaged region comprises:

identifying a feature in the shadow profile; and

classifying the feature in the shadow profile as the anatomical landmark.

16. The system of claim 10 , wherein the one or more ultrasound signals comprise at least one of the plurality of A-lines, a received echo signal, a radiofrequency signal, a digitized radiofrequency signal, a pulse echo signal, an acoustic reflection line, and a transmit receive line.

Assignments (3)
CHANGE OF NAME Recorded Nov 19, 2021
From: RIVANNA MEDICAL, LLC
To: RIVANNA MEDICAL, LLC
Reel/Frame 058215/0666 →
CHANGE OF NAME Recorded Nov 19, 2021
From: RIVANNA MEDICAL, LLC
To: RIVANNA MEDICAL, INC.
Reel/Frame 058215/0670 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Jan 14, 2019
From: MAULDIN, FRANK WILLIAM, JR.; DIXON, ADAM
To: RIVANNA MEDICAL LLC
Reel/Frame 047990/0277 →
Continuity (2)
Provisional Application 62376770 · Aug 18, 2016
Related Publication 20190192114A1 · Jun 27, 2019
References Cited (22)
US 4476873A · Sorenson et al. · 1984 [cited by applicant]
US 20030179915A1 · Goto · 2003 [cited by examiner]
US 20030216648A1 · Lizzi · 2003 [cited by examiner]
US 20050113695A1 · Miller · 2005 [cited by examiner]
US 20060206032A1 · Miele · 2006 [cited by examiner]
US 20120243757A1 · Funka-Lea · 2012 [cited by examiner]
US 20140005542A1 · Bizzell et al. · 2014 [cited by applicant]
US 20150223777A1 · Rasoulian et al. · 2015 [cited by applicant]
US 20160012582A1 · Mauldin, Jr. et al. · 2016 [cited by applicant]
US 20160249879A1 · Mauldin, Jr. · 2016 [cited by examiner]
CN 104637044A · 2015 [cited by examiner]
JP 2010207492A · 2010 [cited by examiner]
WO 20140134188A1 · 2014 [cited by applicant]
WO WO2014134188A1 · 2014 [cited by applicant]
Chin et al., “Ultrasonography of the Adult Thoracic and Lumbar Spine for Central Neuraxial blockade”, Anesthesiology, vol. 114, No. 6. Jun. 2011, pp. 1459-1485 (Year: 2011). [cited by examiner]
Ashab, H.A., et al., “An Augmented Reality System for Epidural Anesthesia (AREA): Prepuncture Identification of Vertebrae”, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering, vol. 60, No. 9, Sep. 2013. pp. 2636-2644. (Year: 2… [cited by examiner]
Berton, F., et al., “Segmentation of the Spinous Process and its Acoustic Shadow in Vertebral Ultrasound images”, Computers in Biology and Medicine 72 (2016) 201-211. (Year: 2016). [cited by examiner]
Berton Florian et al: “Automatic Segmentation o f Vertebrae i n Ultrasound Images”, Jul. 4, 2015 (Jul. 4, 2015), International Conference On Financial Cryptography and Data Security; [Lecture Notes in Computer Science; … [cited by applicant]
Berton Florian et al: “Segmentation of the spinous process and its acoustic shadow in vertebral ultrasound images”, Computers in Biology and Medicine, New York, NY, US, vol. 72, Mar. 26, 2016 (Mar. 26, 2016), pp. 201-21… [cited by applicant]
Extended European Search Report in European Application No. 17842161.6, dated Mar. 9, 2020, 6 pages. [cited by applicant]
W.J. Vander Beek, “Use of the Portable Ultrasound to Determine Favorable Level and Angle for Epidural Puncture.”, Providence St. Peter Hospital, Olympia, WA, Anesthesia Support Department, 2006, pp. 1-12. [cited by applicant]
ISA, “International Search Report”, PCT/US2017/047472, Nov. 6, 2017. [cited by applicant]