IP Library Granted Patent US 10,929,941
Granted Patent B1
US 10,929,941 · App. 16/360,870 · Granted Feb 23, 2021

Controlled incarceration risk mitigation mechanisms for at risk constituents employing controlled-environment facility communications systems

Inventors: Shuaib Suleman (Plano, TX); Adam Christopher Edwards (Fort Worth, TX)
Assignee: Securus Technologies, LLC
G06Q50/26H04L12/1818H04M3/38
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 10,929,941
App. No.
16/360,870
Granted
Feb 23, 2021
Kind
B1
Abstract

The present systems and methods for incarceration risk mitigation for an at risk constituent may match, such as by a controlled-environment facility Administration and Management System (AMS), a non-resident constituent with a correctional facility inmate, based, at least in part on an offense committed by the non-resident constituent and a criminal offense committed by the correctional facility inmate. A controlled-environment facility visitation system, or the like, may then schedule a controlled-environment facility communication between the non-resident constituent and the correctional facility inmate. A controlled-environment facility communication processing system, or the like, may provide a communication link between the non-resident constituent and the correctional facility inmate, as scheduled. The AMS, or the like, may report participation for the non-resident constituent and/or the correctional facility inmate in the controlled-environment facility communication.

Claims (90)

1. A system for mitigating incarceration risk of an at risk constituent, the system comprising:

a controlled-environment facility visitation system comprising a processor and a memory coupled to the processor for storing program instructions, that upon execution by the processor of the controlled-environment facility visitation system, cause the controlled-environment facility visitation system to, schedule a controlled-environment facility communication between a non-resident constituent and a correctional facility inmate;

a controlled-environment facility communication processing system comprising a processor and a memory couple to the processor for storing program instructions, that upon execution by the processor of the controlled-environment facility communication processing system cause the controlled-environment facility communication processing system to provide a communication link between the non-resident constituent and the correctional facility inmate; and

a controlled-environment facility administration and management system comprising a processor and a memory coupled to the processor for storing program instructions for execution by the processor, the program instructions of the controlled-environment facility administration and management system, upon execution by the processor of the controlled-environment facility administration and management system, cause the controlled-environment facility administration and management system to:

match, prior to scheduling the controlled-environment facility communication and/or providing the communication link, the non-resident constituent with the correctional facility inmate, based, at least in part on an offense committed by the non-resident constituent and a criminal offense committed by the correctional facility inmate; and

report participation for at least one of the non-resident constituent and the correctional facility inmate in the controlled-environment facility communication.

2. The system of claim 1 , wherein the non-resident constituent is a youth referred to participate in the controlled-environment facility communication.

3. The system of claim 1 , wherein the program instructions of the controlled-environment facility administration and management system further cause the controlled-environment facility administration and management system to match the non-resident constituent with the correctional facility inmate, further based, at least in part, on known inmate information.

4. The system of claim 3 , wherein the known inmate information, includes one or more of:

the inmate's: criminal history, including details of criminal offenses committed and sentencing details;

violations of correctional facility rules while incarcerated;

recidivism rate;

education background;

education level;

community service participation while incarcerated;

one or more references;

prison service provided;

relevant religious status and/or affiliation;

work history;

race;

gender;

ethnicity;

languages spoken;

investigative history; and

contraband-related concerns.

5. The system of claim 1 , wherein the program instructions further cause the controlled-environment facility administration and management system, the controlled-environment facility visitation system and/or the controlled-environment facility communication processing system to accept, from an institution, an indication of participation of the non-resident constituent in the controlled-environment facility communication, prior to matching the non-resident constituent with the correctional facility inmate, and wherein reporting participation comprises reporting participation of the non-resident constituent in the controlled-environment facility communication between the non-resident constituent and the correctional facility inmate, to the institution.

6. The system of claim 1 , wherein the program instructions further cause the controlled-environment facility administration and management system, the controlled-environment facility visitation system and/or the controlled-environment facility communication processing system to determine if a particular inmate is qualified to participate in the controlled-environment facility communication, prior to, or as part of matching the non-resident constituent with the correctional facility inmate, and wherein reporting participation comprises reporting participation of the particular inmate in the controlled-environment facility communication between the non-resident constituent and the correctional facility inmate, to the correctional facility.

7. The system of claim 6 , wherein determining if the particular inmate is qualified to participate in the controlled-environment facility communication is based, at least in part, on known inmate information.

8. The system of claim 7 , wherein the known inmate information, includes one or more of:

the inmate's: criminal history, including details of criminal offenses committed and sentencing details;

violations of correctional facility rules while incarcerated;

recidivism rate;

education background;

education level;

community service participation while incarcerated;

one or more references;

prison service provided;

relevant religious status and/or affiliation;

work history;

investigative history; and

contraband-related concerns.

9. The system of claim 1 , wherein the program instructions further cause the controlled-environment facility administration and management system, the controlled-environment facility visitation system and/or the controlled-environment facility communication processing system to monitor the controlled-environment facility communication between the non-resident constituent and the correctional facility inmate.

10. The system of claim 1 , wherein the program instructions further cause the controlled-environment facility communication processing system to present, in a respective user interface, an option to each of the non-resident constituent and the correctional facility inmate, during the controlled-environment facility communication, to immediately end the controlled-environment facility communication between the non-resident constituent and the correctional facility inmate.

11. A method for incarceration risk mitigation for an at risk constituent comprising:

matching, by a controlled-environment facility administration and management system, a non-resident constituent with a correctional facility inmate, based, at least in part on an offense committed by the non-resident constituent and a criminal offense committed by the correctional facility inmate;

scheduling, by a controlled-environment facility visitation system, a controlled-environment facility communication between the non-resident constituent and the correctional facility inmate;

providing, by a controlled-environment facility communication processing system, a communication link between the non-resident constituent and the correctional facility inmate; and

reporting, by the controlled-environment facility administration and management system, participation for at least one of the non-resident constituent and the correctional facility inmate in the controlled-environment facility communication.

12. The method of claim 11 , wherein the non-resident constituent is a youth referred to participate in the method for incarceration risk mitigation for an at risk constituent.

13. The method of claim 11 , wherein matching the non-resident constituent with the correctional facility inmate, is further based, at least in part, on known inmate information.

14. The method of claim 13 , wherein the known inmate information, includes one or more of:

the inmate's: criminal history, including details of criminal offenses committed and sentencing details;

violations of correctional facility rules while incarcerated;

recidivism rate;

education background;

education level;

community service participation while incarcerated;

one or more references;

prison service provided;

relevant religious status and/or affiliation;

work history;

race;

gender;

ethnicity;

languages spoken;

investigative history; and

contraband-related concerns.

15. The method of claim 11 , further comprising offering the method to an institution and accepting an indication of participation of the non-resident constituent in the method from the institution, prior to matching the non-resident constituent with the correctional facility inmate, and wherein reporting participation comprises reporting participation of the non-resident constituent in the controlled-environment facility communication between the non-resident constituent and the correctional facility inmate, to the institution.

16. The method of claim 11 , further comprising offering the method to inmates of the correctional facility and determining if a particular inmate is qualified to participate in the method for incarceration risk mitigation, prior to, or as a part of matching the non-resident constituent with the correctional facility inmate, and wherein reporting participation comprises reporting participation of the particular inmate in the controlled-environment facility communication between the non-resident constituent and the correctional facility inmate, to the correctional facility.

17. The method of claim 16 , wherein determining if the particular inmate is qualified to participate in the controlled-environment facility communication is based, at least in part, on known inmate information.

18. The method of claim 11 , wherein the known inmate information, includes one or more of:

the inmate's: criminal history, including details of criminal offenses committed and sentencing details;

violations of correctional facility rules while incarcerated;

recidivism rate;

education background;

education level;

community service participation while incarcerated;

one or more references;

prison service provided;

relevant religious status and/or affiliation;

work history;

investigative history; and

contraband-related concerns.

19. The method of claim 11 , further comprising monitoring the controlled-environment facility communication between the non-resident constituent and the correctional facility inmate.

20. The method of claim 11 , further comprising presenting, in a respective user interface, an option to each of the non-resident constituent and the correctional facility inmate, during the controlled-environment facility communication, to immediately end the controlled-environment facility communication between the non-resident constituent and the correctional facility inmate.

21. A computer readable non-transitory medium having program instructions stored thereon that upon execution by one or more of a controlled-environment facility visitation system, a controlled-environment facility communication processing system and controlled-environment facility administration and management system, cause the respective controlled-environment facility visitation system, controlled-environment facility communication processing system and/or controlled-environment facility administration and management system to:

match a non-resident constituent with a correctional facility inmate, based, at least in part on an offense committed by the non-resident constituent and a criminal offense committed by the correctional facility inmate;

schedule a controlled-environment facility communication between the non-resident constituent and the correctional facility inmate;

provide a communication link between the non-resident constituent and the correctional facility inmate; and

report participation for at least one of the non-resident constituent and the correctional facility inmate in the controlled-environment facility communication.

Assignments (15)
ASSIGNMENT OF SECURITY INTEREST IN PATENTS Recorded Apr 21, 2025
From: DEUTSCHE BANK AG NEW YORK BRANCH, AS EXISTING COLLATERAL AGENT
To: WILMINGTON SAVINGS FUND SOCIETY, FSB, AS SUCCESSOR COLLATERAL AGENT
Reel/Frame 070903/0303 →
RELEASE OF SECURITY INTEREST Recorded Mar 29, 2024
From: ALTER DOMUS (US) LLC
To: AVENTIV TECHNOLOGIES, LLC; SECURUS TECHNOLOGIES, LLC; ALLPAID, INC.
Reel/Frame 066952/0914 →
RELEASE OF SECURITY INTEREST Recorded Mar 29, 2024
From: ALTER DOMUS (US) LLC
To: AVENTIV TECHNOLOGIES, LLC; SECURUS TECHNOLOGIES, LLC; ALLPAID, INC.
Reel/Frame 066951/0630 →
RELEASE OF SECURITY INTEREST Recorded Mar 29, 2024
From: ALTER DOMUS (US) LLC
To: AVENTIV TECHNOLOGIES, LLC; SECURUS TECHNOLOGIES, LLC; ALLPAID, INC.
Reel/Frame 066951/0561 →
SECURITY INTEREST Recorded Mar 29, 2024
From: AVENTIV TECHNOLOGIES, LLC; SECURUS TECHNOLOGIES, LLC; SATELLITE TRACKING OF PEOPLE LLC; ALLPAID, INC.
To: WILMINGTON SAVINGS FUND SOCIETY, FSB
Reel/Frame 066951/0054 →
RELEASE OF SECURITY INTEREST Recorded Mar 29, 2024
From: ALTER DOMUS (US) LLC
To: AVENTIV TECHNOLOGIES, LLC; SECURUS TECHNOLOGIES, LLC; ALLPAID, INC.
Reel/Frame 066951/0385 →
RELEASE OF SECURITY INTEREST Recorded Mar 29, 2024
From: ALTER DOMUS (US) LLC
To: AVENTIV TECHNOLOGIES, LLC; SECURUS TECHNOLOGIES, LLC; ALLPAID, INC.
Reel/Frame 066951/0514 →
SUPER-PRIORITY FIRST LIEN PATENT SECURITY AGREEMENT Recorded Mar 28, 2024
From: SECURUS TECHNOLOGIES, LLC; SATELLITE TRACKING OF PEOPLE LLC; ALLPAID, INC.
To: DEUTSCHE BANK AG NEW YORK BRANCH AS COLLATERAL AGENT
Reel/Frame 066945/0310 →
PRIORITY SECOND LIEN PATENT SECURITY AGREEMENT Recorded Feb 1, 2024
From: SECURUS TECHNOLOGIES, LLC; SATELLITE TRACKING OF PEOPLE LLC; ALLPAID, INC.
To: WILMINGTON SAVINGS FUND SOCIETY, FSB AS COLLATERAL AGENT
Reel/Frame 066436/0420 →
PRIORITY FIRST LIEN PATENT SECURITY AGREEMENT Recorded Jan 2, 2024
From: SECURUS TECHNOLOGIES, LLC; ALLPAID, INC.; SATELLITE TRACKING OF PEOPLE LLC
To: DEUTSCHE BANK AG NEW YORK BRANCH, AS COLLATERAL AGENT
Reel/Frame 066567/0620 →
SECURITY INTEREST Recorded Aug 24, 2023
From: ALLPAID, INC.; SATELLITE TRACKING OF PEOPLE LLC; SECURUS TECHNOLOGIES, LLC
To: THE BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON TRUST COMPANY, N.A.
Reel/Frame 064699/0842 →
SECURITY INTEREST Recorded May 25, 2021
From: SECURUS TECHNOLOGIES, LLC; SATELLITE TRACKING OF PEOPLE LLC; ALLPAID, INC.
To: DEUTSCHE BANK AG NEW YORK BRANCH
Reel/Frame 056368/0076 →
SECURITY INTEREST Recorded May 25, 2021
From: SATELLITE TRACKING OF PEOPLE LLC; ALLPAID, INC.; SECURUS TECHNOLOGIES, LLC
To: DEUTSCHE BANK AG NEW YORK BRANCH
Reel/Frame 056368/0011 →
CHANGE OF NAME Recorded Aug 12, 2020
From: SECURUS TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
To: SECURUS TECHNOLOGIES, LLC
Reel/Frame 053476/0289 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Mar 21, 2019
From: SULEMAN, SHUAIB; EDWARDS, ADAM CHRISTOPHER
To: SECURUS TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
Reel/Frame 048665/0065 →
Cited By (1)
US 12,395,368