IP Library Granted Patent US 10,796,552
Granted Patent B2
US 10,796,552 · App. 16/362,847 · Granted Oct 6, 2020

Remote data monitoring and collection system with multi-tiered analysis

Inventor: Michael Fahey (Medway, MA)
Assignee: InfoBionic, Inc.
G08B21/10A61B5/0002A61B5/0006A61B5/0022A61B5/0205A61B5/08A61B5/14552G06F19/3418G16H40/67Y02A90/26
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 10,796,552
App. No.
16/362,847
Granted
Oct 6, 2020
Kind
B2
Abstract

A system collects and stores data from a source at a high resolution and/or a high data rate (“more detailed data”) and sends a low-resolution and/or downsampled version of the data (“less detailed data”) to a remote server via a wireless network. The server automatically analyzes the less detailed data to detect an anomaly, such as an arrhythmia, earthquake or failure of a structural member. A two-tiered analysis scheme is used, where the first tier is less specific than the second tier. If the first tier analysis detects or suspects the anomaly, the server signals the data collector to send more detailed data that corresponds to a time period associated with the anomaly. The more specific second tier analyses the more detailed data to verify the anomaly. The server may also store the received data and make it available to a user, such as via a graphical or tabular display.

Claims (36)

1. A system for remotely monitoring data from a data source, comprising:

a data collection unit configured to:

(a) collect data from the data source at a sampling rate;

(b) periodically transmit a first subset of the collected data to a remotely located analysis unit at a transmission duty cycle, wherein the transmission duty cycle defines a time interval between successive data transmissions in the periodic transmission, and wherein the analysis unit is configured to change the transmission duty cycle of the data collection unit; and

(c) transmit a second subset of the collected data to the analysis unit in response to a signal for additional data from the analysis unit; and

the analysis unit, wherein the analysis unit is configured to:

(i) automatically analyze the first subset of data received from the data collection unit using a first computer algorithm;

(ii) transmit the signal for additional data to the data collection unit when the analysis of the first subset of data indicates an anomaly; and

(iii) automatically analyze the second subset of data received from the data collection unit using a second computer algorithm to confirm the anomaly.

2. The system of claim 1 , wherein the first subset is at least one of (i) a lower resolution data than the collected data or (ii) data at a lower sampling rate than the collected data.

3. The system of claim 1 , wherein the analysis unit is configured to:

automatically analyze the first subset of data using a first analysis technique; and

automatically analyze the second subset of data using a second analysis technique, wherein the second analysis technique has a higher specificity for the anomaly than the first analysis technique.

4. The system of claim 1 , wherein the analysis unit is configured to receive a first analysis criteria from a user and analyze the first subset of data based on the received first analysis criteria.

5. The system of claim 4 , wherein the analysis unit is further configured to receive a second analysis criteria from a user and analyze the second subset of data based on the received second analysis criteria.

6. The system of claim 1 , wherein the analysis unit is configured to change the sampling rate at which the data collection unit collects data from the data source.

7. The system of claim 6 , wherein the analysis unit is configured to change the sampling rate and/or the transmission duty cycle automatically in response to detecting that a data value of the first subset or the second subset of data exceeds or falls below a predetermined threshold value.

8. The system of claim 1 , wherein the anomaly includes one of an earthquake, a tsunami, an unsafe condition in at least one of a gas well, an oil well and a mine, severe weather, an unsafe mechanical condition in a structural member of a construct, failure of a structural member of a construct, an unsafe condition within a geological structure, a nuclear radiation level that exceeds a predetermined value, an explosion, or a decompression.

9. The system of claim 1 , wherein the data collection unit includes one or more sensors configured to collect data from the data source operatively coupled to a wireless transceiver configured to transmit data to the analysis unit.

10. A method for remotely monitoring data from a data source, comprising:

(a) collecting data from the data source at a sampling rate using a data collection unit;

(b) periodically transmitting a first subset of the collected data from the data collection unit to a remotely located analysis unit at a transmission duty cycle, wherein the transmission duty cycle defines a time interval between successive data transmissions in the periodic transmission, wherein the analysis unit is configured to change the transmission duty cycle of the data collection unit;

(c) automatically analyzing the first subset of data received from the data collection unit using a first computer algorithm in the analysis unit;

(d) transmitting a signal for additional data from the analysis unit to the data collection unit when the analysis of step (c) indicates an anomaly;

(e) transmitting a second subset of the collected data from the data collection unit to the analysis unit in response to the signal for additional data from the analysis unit; and

(f) automatically analyzing the second subset of data received from the data collection unit using a second computer algorithm in the analysis unit to confirm the anomaly.

11. The method of claim 10 , wherein the first subset is at least one of (i) a lower resolution data than the data collected in step (a), or (ii) data at a lower sampling rate than the data collected in step (a).

12. The method of claim 10 , wherein:

automatically analyzing the first subset of data includes analyzing the first subset of data using a first analysis technique; and

automatically analyzing the second subset of data includes analyzing the second subset of data using a second analysis technique, wherein the second analysis technique has a higher specificity for the anomaly than the first analysis technique.

13. The method of claim 10 , further including receiving in the analysis unit a first analysis criteria from a user, wherein automatically analyzing the first subset of data includes analyzing the first subset of data based on the received first analysis criteria.

14. The method of claim 13 , further including receiving in the analysis unit a second analysis criteria from a user, wherein automatically analyzing the second subset of data includes analyzing the second subset of data based on the received second analysis criteria.

15. The method of claim 10 , further including changing the sampling rate at which the data collection unit collects data from the data source using the analysis unit.

16. The method of claim 15 , further including changing the transmission duty cycle at which the data collection unit transmits the first subset of data to the analysis unit using the analysis unit.

17. The method of claim 15 , wherein changing the sampling rate includes automatically changing the sampling rate in response to the analysis unit detecting that a data value of the first subset or the second subset of data exceeds or falls below a predetermined threshold value.

18. The method of claim 10 , wherein the anomaly includes one of an earthquake, a tsunami, an unsafe condition in at least one of a gas well, an oil well and a mine, severe weather, an unsafe mechanical condition in a structural member of a construct, failure of a structural member of a construct, an unsafe condition within a geological structure, a nuclear radiation level that exceeds a predetermined value, an explosion, or a decompression.

Assignments (6)
SECURITY INTEREST Recorded Feb 18, 2025
From: INFOBIONIC, INC.
To: HORIZON TECHNOLOGY FINANCE CORPORATION
Reel/Frame 070239/0929 →
SECURITY INTEREST Recorded Apr 7, 2021
From: INFOBIONIC, INC.
To: HORIZON TECHNOLOGY FINANCE CORPORATION
Reel/Frame 055852/0284 →
INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY SECURITY AGREEMENT TERMINATION AT REEL/FRAME NO. 51458/0733 Recorded Mar 5, 2021
From: SILICON VALLEY BANK
To: INFOBIONIC, INC.
Reel/Frame 055600/0376 →
INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY SECURITY AGREEMENT Recorded Jan 2, 2020
From: INFOBIONIC, INC.
To: SILICON VALLEY BANK
Reel/Frame 051458/0733 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Mar 26, 2019
From: FAHEY, MICHAEL
To: MRN PARTNERS LLP
Reel/Frame 048695/0291 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Mar 26, 2019
From: MRN PARTNERS LLP
To: INFOBIONIC, INC.
Reel/Frame 048695/0341 →
Continuity (4)
Continuation 15055966 · Feb 29, 2016
Continuation 13446498 · Apr 13, 2012
Provisional Application 61476072 · Apr 15, 2011
Related Publication 20190279483A1 · Sep 12, 2019
Cited By (3)
US 12,232,851 US 12,521,022 US 12,558,036