Systems, methods, and devices for evaluating lead placement based on patient physiological responses

1. A method, comprising:

programming a pulse generator to deliver electrical stimulation to a sacral nerve or a pudendal nerve of a patient, wherein the electrical stimulation is delivered at least in part through a lead that is implanted inside the patient;

detecting, via an observation by a user, via a patient feedback tool, or via a sensor, a first physiological response from the patient in response to the electrical stimulation, wherein the first physiological response occurs at a first body region of the patient;

identifying a first value of an electrical stimulation parameter of the electrical stimulation that resulted in the first physiological response for a patient,

detecting, via the observation by the user, via the patient feedback tool, or via the sensor, a second physiological response from the patient in response to the electrical stimulation, wherein the second physiological response occurs at a second body region of the patient different from the first body region;

identifying a second value of the electrical stimulation parameter of the electrical stimulation that resulted in the second physiological response for the patient;

calculating, based on the identified first value, an upper limit of the second value of the electrical stimulation parameter;

comparing the identified second value with the calculated upper limit of the second value; and

communicating, via a graphical user interface and based on the comparing, an evaluation of an implantation of the lead.

2. The method of claim 1 , wherein the evaluation comprises:

determining that the implantation of the lead is satisfactory in response to the comparing indicating that the identified second value is within the upper limit of the second value; or

determining that the implantation of the lead is unsatisfactory in response to the comparing indicating that the identified second value is outside the upper limit of the second value.

3. The method of claim 1 , further comprising: displaying, via the graphical user interface, a visual representation of the second physiological response.

4. The method of claim 3 , wherein the displaying comprises:

displaying the visual representation with a first visual characteristic in response to the comparing indicating that the identified second value is within the upper limit of the second value; or

displaying the visual representation with a second first visual characteristic in response to comparing indicating that the identified second value is outside the upper limit of the second value.

5. The method of claim 1 , wherein the calculating comprises calculating the upper limit of the second value as a predefined function of the identified first value.

6. The method of claim 1 , further comprising:

detecting, via the observation by the user, via the patient feedback tool, or via the sensor, a third physiological response from the patient in response to the electrical stimulation, wherein the third physiological response occurs at a third body region of the patient different from the first body region and different from the second body region;

identifying a third value of the electrical stimulation parameter of the electrical stimulation that resulted in the third physiological response for the patient;

calculating, based on the identified first value or the identified second value, an upper limit of the third value of the electrical stimulation parameter; and

comparing the identified third value with the calculated upper limit of the third value, wherein the evaluation is further based on the comparing of the identified third value with the calculated upper limit of the third value.

7. The method of claim 6 , wherein:

the first physiological response comprises an anal sphincter contraction response;

the second physiological response comprises a bellows response; and

the third physiological response comprises a toes response.

8. The method of claim 1 , further comprising: generating a recommendation to reposition the lead in response to the evaluation indicating that the implantation of the lead is unsatisfactory.

9. An electronic programming device for programming an implantable medical device, the electronic programming device comprising:

a graphical user interface;

a memory storage component configured to store programming code; and

a computer processor component configured to execute the programming code to perform operations that include:

programming a pulse generator to deliver electrical stimulation to a sacral nerve or a pudendal nerve of a patient, wherein the electrical stimulation is delivered at least in part through a lead that is implanted inside the patient;

detecting, via an observation by a user, via a patient feedback tool, or via a sensor, a first physiological response from the patient in response to the electrical stimulation, wherein the first physiological response occurs at a first body region of the patient;

identifying a first value of an electrical stimulation parameter of the electrical stimulation that resulted in the first physiological response for a patient;

detecting, via the observation by the user, via the patient feedback tool, or via the sensor, a second physiological response from the patient in response to the electrical stimulation, wherein the second physiological response occurs at a second body region of the patient different from the first body region;

identifying a second value of the electrical stimulation parameter of the electrical stimulation that resulted in the second physiological response for the patient;

calculating, based on the identified first value, an upper limit of the second value of the electrical stimulation parameter;

comparing the identified second value with the calculated upper limit of the second value; and

communicating, via a graphical user interface and based on the comparing, an evaluation of an implantation of the lead.

10. The electronic programming device of claim 9 , wherein the evaluation comprises:

determining that the implantation of the lead is satisfactory in response to the comparing indicating that the identified second value is within the upper limit of the second value; or

determining that the implantation of the lead is unsatisfactory in response to the comparing indicating that the identified second value is outside the upper limit of the second value.

11. The electronic programming device of claim 9 , wherein the operations further comprise: displaying, via the graphical user interface, a visual representation of the second physiological response.

12. The electronic programming device of claim 11 , wherein the displaying comprises:

displaying the visual representation with a first visual characteristic in response to the comparing indicating that the identified second value is within the upper limit of the second value; or

displaying the visual representation with a second first visual characteristic in response to comparing indicating that the identified second value is outside the upper limit of the second value.

13. The electronic programming device of claim 9 , wherein the calculating comprises calculating the upper limit of the second value as a predefined function of the identified first value.

14. The electronic programming device of claim 9 , wherein the operations further comprise:

detecting, via the observation by the user, via the patient feedback tool, or via the sensor, a third physiological response from the patient in response to the electrical stimulation, wherein the third physiological response occurs at a third body region of the patient different from the first body region and different from the second body region;

identifying a third value of the electrical stimulation parameter of the electrical stimulation that resulted in the third physiological response for the patient;

calculating, based on the identified first value or the identified second value, an upper limit of the third value of the electrical stimulation parameter; and

comparing the identified third value with the calculated upper limit of the third value, wherein the evaluation is further based on the comparing of the identified third value with the calculated upper limit of the third value.

15. The electronic programming device of claim 14 , wherein:

the first physiological response comprises an anal sphincter contraction response; the second physiological response comprises a bellows response; and

the third physiological response comprises a toes response.

16. The electronic programming device of claim 9 , wherein the operations further comprise: generating a recommendation to reposition the lead in response to the evaluation indicating that the implantation of the lead is unsatisfactory.

17. A medical system, comprising:

an implantable medical device configured to deliver an electrical stimulation therapy for a patient; and

an electronic programming device for programming the implantable medical device, the electronic programming device includes a memory storage component configured to store programming code and a computer processor component configured to execute the programming code to perform operations that include:

programming a pulse generator to deliver electrical stimulation as a part of the electrical stimulation therapy to a sacral nerve or a pudendal nerve of a patient, wherein the electrical stimulation is delivered at least in part through a lead that is implanted inside the patient;

detecting, via an observation by a user, via a patient feedback tool, or via a sensor, a first physiological response from the patient in response to the electrical stimulation, wherein the first physiological response occurs at a first body region of the patient;

identifying a first value of an electrical stimulation parameter of the electrical stimulation that resulted in the first physiological response for a patient;

detecting, via the observation by the user, via the patient feedback tool, or via the sensor, a second physiological response from the patient in response to the electrical stimulation, wherein the second physiological response occurs at a second body region of the patient different from the first body region;

identifying a second value of the electrical stimulation parameter of the electrical stimulation that resulted in the second physiological response for the patient;

calculating, based on the identified first value, an upper limit of the second value of the electrical stimulation parameter;

comparing the identified second value with the calculated upper limit of the second value; and

communicating, via a graphical user interface and based on the comparing, an evaluation of an implantation of the lead.

18. The medical system of claim 17 , wherein the evaluation comprises:

determining that the implantation of the lead is satisfactory in response to the comparing indicating that the identified second value is within the upper limit of the second value; or

determining that the implantation of the lead is unsatisfactory in response to the comparing indicating that the identified second value is outside the upper limit of the second value.

19. The medical system of claim 17 , wherein the operations further comprise:

displaying, via the graphical user interface, a visual representation of the second physiological response with a first visual characteristic in response to the comparing indicating that the identified second value is within the upper limit of the second value; or

displaying, via the graphical user interface, the visual representation of the second physiological response with a second first visual characteristic in response to the comparing indicating that the identified second value is outside the upper limit of the second value.

20. The medical system of claim 17 , wherein the calculating the upper limit of the second value as a predefined function of the identified first value.