Addressing vehicle sensor abnormalities
Techniques are described with respect to addressing at least one sensor abnormality associated with a vehicle. An associated method includes receiving a first measurement value from a first sensor among a plurality of sensors associated with a vehicle and receiving a second measurement value from a second sensor among the plurality of sensors. The method further includes identifying at least one sensor abnormality based upon an inconsistency between the first measurement value and the second measurement value. In an embodiment, the at least one sensor abnormality results from at least one sensor defect, at least one vehicle security fault, or a combination thereof. The method further includes completing at least one predefined action to address the at least one sensor abnormality.
1. A method comprising:
receiving a first measurement value from a first sensor among a plurality of sensors associated with a vehicle;
receiving a second measurement value from a second sensor among the plurality of sensors;
identifying at least one sensor abnormality resulting from at least one inherent manufacturing defect by determining that the first measurement value and the second measurement value are indicative of contradictory vehicle metrics; and
completing at least one predefined action to address the at least one sensor abnormality, wherein completing the at least one predefined action comprises transferring responsibility of sensor functionality according to a sensor failover procedure and analyzing recorded vehicle-specific sensor defect metadata in the context of collective sensor defect metadata derived from a plurality of vehicles to identify a pattern with respect to at least one defective vehicle part.
2. The method of claim 1 , wherein identifying the at least one sensor abnormality comprises:
responsive to determining that a vehicle metric measured by the first sensor is comparable to a vehicle metric measured by the second sensor:
determining that the first measurement value differs from the second measurement value beyond a predefined threshold;
receiving a third measurement value from a third sensor among the plurality of sensors;
identifying the first sensor as abnormal responsive to determining that the third measurement value differs from the first measurement value beyond the predefined threshold; and
identifying the second sensor as abnormal responsive to determining that the third measurement value differs from the second measurement value beyond the predefined threshold.
3. The method of claim 1 , wherein completing the at least one predefined action further comprises:
responsive to determining that the at least one sensor abnormality is isolated to a one or more nonessential subsystems of the vehicle, disabling the one or more nonessential subsystems.
4. The method of claim 1 , wherein completing the at least one predefined action further comprises:
responsive to determining that the at least one sensor abnormality affects overall safety or functionality of the vehicle, disabling all functional capabilities of the vehicle.
5. The method of claim 1 , wherein identifying the pattern with respect to the at least one defective vehicle part comprises calculating a similarity factor as a ratio of a total number of metadata matches found among analogous vehicle sensors of multiple vehicles that are associated with the at least one defective vehicle part to a total number of possible metadata matches based upon a comparison of metadata aspects of the analogous vehicle sensors.
6. The method of claim 1 , wherein completing the at least one predefined action further comprises:
updating a known errors system based upon the identified pattern.
7. The method of claim 1 , wherein completing the at least one predefined action further comprises:
determining a recall protocol with respect to the at least one defective vehicle part based upon the identified pattern.
8. The method of claim 1 , wherein completing the at least one predefined action comprises transferring the responsibility of sensor functionality to duplicate vehicle sensors.
9. The method of claim 1 , wherein the first measurement value is indicative of vehicle speed, and wherein the second measurement value is indicative of vehicle distance travelled.
10. The method of claim 1 , wherein the first measurement value is indicative of vehicle speed, and wherein the second measurement value is indicative of vehicle proximity to an obstacle.
11. The method of claim 1 , wherein the first measurement value is indicative of vehicle speed, and wherein the second measurement value is indicative of vehicle altitude.
12. The method of claim 1 , wherein completing the at least one predefined action comprises transferring the responsibility of sensor functionality to standby vehicle sensors.
13. A computer program product comprising a computer readable storage medium having program instructions embodied therewith, the program instructions executable by a computing device to cause the computing device to:
receive a first measurement value from a first sensor among a plurality of sensors associated with a vehicle;
receive a second measurement value from a second sensor among the plurality of sensors;
identify at least one sensor abnormality resulting from at least one inherent manufacturing defect by determining that the first measurement value and the second measurement value are indicative of contradictory vehicle metrics; and
complete at least one predefined action to address the at least one sensor abnormality, wherein completing the at least one predefined action comprises transferring responsibility of sensor functionality according to a sensor failover procedure and analyzing recorded vehicle-specific sensor defect metadata in the context of collective sensor defect metadata derived from a plurality of vehicles to identify a pattern with respect to at least one defective vehicle part.
14. The computer program product of claim 13 , wherein identifying the at least one sensor abnormality comprises:
responsive to determining that a vehicle metric measured by the first sensor is comparable to a vehicle metric measured by the second sensor:
determining that the first measurement value differs from the second measurement value beyond a predefined threshold;
receiving a third measurement value from a third sensor among the plurality of sensors;
identifying the first sensor as abnormal responsive to determining that the third measurement value differs from the first measurement value beyond the predefined threshold; and
identifying the second sensor as abnormal responsive to determining that the third measurement value differs from the second measurement value beyond the predefined threshold.
15. The computer program product of claim 13 , wherein completing the at least one predefined action further comprises:
responsive to determining that the at least one sensor abnormality is isolated to a one or more nonessential subsystems of the vehicle, disabling the one or more nonessential subsystems.
16. The computer program product of claim 13 , wherein completing the at least one predefined action further comprises:
responsive to determining that the at least one sensor abnormality affects overall safety or functionality of the vehicle, disabling all functional capabilities of the vehicle.
17. A system comprising:
a processor; and
a memory storing an application program, which, when executed on the processor, performs an operation comprising:
receiving a first measurement value from a first sensor among a plurality of sensors associated with a vehicle;
receiving a second measurement value from a second sensor among the plurality of sensors;
identifying at least one sensor abnormality resulting from at least one inherent manufacturing defect by determining that the first measurement value and the second measurement value are indicative of contradictory vehicle metrics; and
completing at least one predefined action to address the at least one sensor abnormality, wherein completing the at least one predefined action comprises transferring responsibility of sensor functionality according to a sensor failover procedure and analyzing recorded vehicle-specific sensor defect metadata in the context of collective sensor defect metadata derived from a plurality of vehicles to identify a pattern with respect to at least one defective vehicle part.
18. The system of claim 17 , wherein identifying the at least one sensor abnormality comprises:
responsive to determining that a vehicle metric measured by the first sensor is comparable to a vehicle metric measured by the second sensor:
determining that the first measurement value differs from the second measurement value beyond a predefined threshold;
receiving a third measurement value from a third sensor among the plurality of sensors;
identifying the first sensor as abnormal responsive to determining that the third measurement value differs from the first measurement value beyond the predefined threshold; and
identifying the second sensor as abnormal responsive to determining that the third measurement value differs from the second measurement value beyond the predefined threshold.
19. The system of claim 17 , wherein completing the at least one predefined action further comprises:
responsive to determining that the at least one sensor abnormality is isolated to a one or more nonessential subsystems of the vehicle, disabling the one or more nonessential subsystems.