IP Library Granted Patent US 10,535,251
Granted Patent B1
US 10,535,251 · App. 16/404,079 · Granted Jan 14, 2020

Alarm signaling technology

Inventors: Stephen Scott Trundle (Falls Church, VA); Alison Jane Slavin (Vienna, VA); Jean-Paul Martin (Oakton, VA)
Assignee: Alarm.com Incorporated
G08B29/046G08B25/005G08B25/006G08B29/02G08B29/185G08B25/008
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 10,535,251
App. No.
16/404,079
Granted
Jan 14, 2020
Kind
B1
Abstract

Techniques are described for handling an event where a control panel or an alarm signaling device is tampered with or destroyed by a disablement tactic, e.g., a “crash and smash intrusion.”

Claims (36)

1. A server comprising:

at least one processor; and

at least one non-transitory computer-readable storage medium coupled to the at least one processor having stored thereon instructions which, when executed by the at least one processor, causes the at least one processor to perform operations comprising:

receiving monitoring data related to events from multiple, different monitored locations;

aggregating the received monitoring data in geographic regions to enable detection of events in the geographic regions;

tracking crime incident data in the geographic regions;

based on aggregation of the received monitoring data and tracking of the crime incident data, identifying regionalized monitoring and crime incident data associated with a particular geographic region; and

based on the identification of the regionalized monitoring and crime incident data associated with the particular geographic region, taking action for monitored locations in the particular geographic region.

2. The server of claim 1 , wherein receiving monitoring data related to events from multiple, different monitored locations comprises receiving alarm system data related to alarm system destruction detection.

3. The server of claim 1 , wherein receiving monitoring data related to events from multiple, different monitored locations comprises receiving alarm system data from alarm systems at the multiple, different monitored locations.

4. The server of claim 1 :

wherein identifying regionalized monitoring and crime incident data associated with the particular geographic region comprises analyzing the aggregated monitoring data and the tracked crime incident data to identify a regionalized pattern of events associated with the particular geographic region; and

wherein taking action for monitored locations in the particular geographic region comprises taking action for monitored locations in the particular geographic region based on the regionalized pattern of events associated with the particular geographic region.

5. The server of claim 1 , wherein identifying regionalized monitoring and crime incident data associated with the particular geographic region comprises correlating different types of events together.

6. The server of claim 1 , wherein the operations further comprise updating the regionalized monitoring and crime incident data associated with the particular geographic region continuously as new monitoring and crime data from the particular geographic region is aggregated and tracked.

7. The server of claim 1 , wherein taking action for monitored locations in the particular geographic region comprises using the regionalized monitoring and crime incident data associated with the particular geographic region to modify one or more parameters used by the monitored locations in the particular geographic region for detecting events.

8. The server of claim 7 , wherein using the regionalized monitoring and crime incident data associated with the particular geographic region to modify one or more parameters used by the monitored locations in the particular geographic region for detecting events comprises reducing a parameter to provide faster detection of future events in the particular geographic region.

9. The server of claim 7 , wherein using the regionalized monitoring and crime incident data associated with the particular geographic region to modify one or more parameters used by the monitored locations in the particular geographic region for detecting events comprises reducing an escrow period for alarm signals from alarm systems in the particular geographic region based on the regionalized monitoring and crime incident data indicating an increase in a number of alarm system events in the particular geographic region.

10. The server of claim 1 , wherein taking action for monitored locations in the particular geographic region comprises comparing the regionalized monitoring and crime incident data associated with the particular geographic region to future monitoring data to identify patterns that indicate similar events.

11. A method comprising:

receiving monitoring data related to events from multiple, different monitored locations;

aggregating the received monitoring data in geographic regions to enable detection of events in the geographic regions;

tracking crime incident data in the geographic regions;

based on aggregation of the received monitoring data and tracking of the crime incident data, identifying regionalized monitoring and crime incident data associated with a particular geographic region; and

based on the identification of the regionalized monitoring and crime incident data associated with the particular geographic region, taking action for monitored locations in the particular geographic region.

12. The method of claim 11 , wherein receiving monitoring data related to events from multiple, different monitored locations comprises receiving alarm system data related to alarm system destruction detection.

13. The method of claim 11 , wherein receiving monitoring data related to events from multiple, different monitored locations comprises receiving alarm system data from alarm systems at the multiple, different monitored locations.

14. The method of claim 11 :

wherein identifying regionalized monitoring and crime incident data associated with the particular geographic region comprises analyzing the aggregated monitoring data and the tracked crime incident data to identify a regionalized pattern of events associated with the particular geographic region; and

wherein taking action for monitored locations in the particular geographic region comprises taking action for monitored locations in the particular geographic region based on the regionalized pattern of events associated with the particular geographic region.

15. The method of claim 11 , wherein identifying regionalized monitoring and crime incident data associated with the particular geographic region comprises correlating different types of events together.

16. The method of claim 11 , wherein the operations further comprise updating the regionalized monitoring and crime incident data associated with the particular geographic region continuously as new monitoring and crime data from the particular geographic region is aggregated and tracked.

17. The method of claim 11 , wherein taking action for monitored locations in the particular geographic region comprises using the regionalized monitoring and crime incident data associated with the particular geographic region to modify one or more parameters used by the monitored locations in the particular geographic region for detecting events.

18. The method of claim 17 , wherein using the regionalized monitoring and crime incident data associated with the particular geographic region to modify one or more parameters used by the monitored locations in the particular geographic region for detecting events comprises reducing a parameter to provide faster detection of future events in the particular geographic region.

19. The method of claim 17 , wherein using the regionalized monitoring and crime incident data associated with the particular geographic region to modify one or more parameters used by the monitored locations in the particular geographic region for detecting events comprises reducing an escrow period for alarm signals from alarm systems in the particular geographic region based on the regionalized monitoring and crime incident data indicating an increase in a number of alarm system events in the particular geographic region.

20. The method of claim 11 , wherein taking action for monitored locations in the particular geographic region comprises comparing the regionalized monitoring and crime incident data associated with the particular geographic region to future monitoring data to identify patterns that indicate similar events.

Assignments (1)
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Jun 19, 2019
From: TRUNDLE, STEPHEN SCOTT; SLAVIN, ALISON JANE; MARTIN, JEAN-PAUL
To: ALARM.COM INCORPORATED
Reel/Frame 049515/0583 →
Cited By (1)
US 12,266,186