IP Library Granted Patent US 10,893,383
Granted Patent B2
US 10,893,383 · App. 16/404,516 · Granted Jan 12, 2021

Systems and methods for monitoring system equipment diagnosis

View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 10,893,383
App. No.
16/404,516
Granted
Jan 12, 2021
Kind
B2
Abstract

Various embodiments provide systems and methods for diagnosing monitoring system equipment functionality. In some instances, a first test command is provided to a user attached monitor device and a second test command is provided to a user detached monitor device. A first test result is received from the user attached monitor device and a second test result is received from the user detached monitor device. A combination of the first test result and the second test result is analyzed to determine an operation status.

Claims (66)

1. A method for determining operation status of a monitoring system, the method comprising:

transmitting a first test command to a user attached monitor device, wherein the user attached monitor device is physically attached to an individual being monitored;

providing a second test command to a user detached monitor device, wherein the user detached monitor device is associated with the individual being monitored;

receiving a first test result in response to the first test command from the user attached monitor device;

receiving a second test result corresponding to the second test command from the user detached monitor device; and

analyzing a combination of the first test result and the second test result to determine an operation status of at least one of the user attached monitor device and the user detached monitor device.

2. The method of claim 1 , the method further comprising:

providing the user attached monitor device, wherein the user attached monitor device includes: location determination functionality, motion determination functionality, and a strap for attaching the user attached monitor device to the individual.

3. The method of claim 1 , the method further comprising:

providing the user detached monitor device, wherein the user detached monitor device includes: location determination functionality, and motion determination functionality.

4. The method of claim 3 , wherein the user detached monitor device is a cellular communication device.

5. The method of claim 1 , wherein the analyzing is performed by a central monitoring station, the method further comprising:

reporting an analysis result derived from analyzing the combination of the first test result and the second test result, wherein the analysis result is reported from the central monitoring station to a person assigned to monitor the individual.

6. The method of claim 1 , wherein the analyzing is performed by the user detached monitor device, the method further comprising:

reporting an analysis result derived from analyzing the combination of the first test result and the second test result, wherein the analysis result is reported from the user detached monitor device to a person assigned to monitor the individual via the central monitoring station.

7. The method of claim 1 , wherein:

the first test command commands the user attached monitor device to determine location of the user attached monitor device;

the first test result is selected from a group consisting of: a location of the user attached monitor device, and a location unavailable message;

the second test command commands the user detached monitor device to determine location of the user detached monitor device;

the second test result is selected from a group consisting of: a location of the user detached monitor device, and a location unavailable message; and

analyzing the combination of the first test result and the second test result includes utilizing both the first test result and the second test result to determine an analysis result indicating at least one of: a user attached motion test fail, a user detached motion test fail, a motion test indefinite, a user attached motion test pass, or a user detached motion test pass.

8. The method of claim 7 , wherein the user attached monitor device determined the location of the user attached monitor device using wireless satellite signals; and wherein the user detached monitor device determined the location of the user detached monitor device using wireless satellite signals.

9. The method of claim 7 , wherein the user attached monitor device determined the location of the user attached monitor device using wireless signals from one or more WiFi access points; and wherein the user detached monitor device determined the location of the user detached monitor device using wireless signals from one or more WiFi access points.

10. The method of claim 1 , wherein:

the first test command commands the user attached monitor device to identify WiFi access points visible to the user attached monitor device;

the first test result is the list of the of WiFi access points visible to the user attached monitor device;

the second test command commands the user detached monitor device to identify WiFi access points visible to the user detached monitor device;

the second test result is the list of the of WiFi access points visible to the user detached monitor device; and

analyzing the combination of the first test result and the second test result includes comparing the list of WiFi access points visible to the user attached monitor device to the list of WiFi access points visible to the user detached monitor device to determine that both the user attached monitor device and the user detached monitor device are seeing a common subset of the list of WiFi access points visible to the user attached monitor device and the list of WiFi access points visible to the user detached monitor device.

11. The method of claim 1 , wherein:

the first test command commands the user attached monitor device to determine motion of the user attached monitor device;

the first test result is a motion result selected from a group consisting of: a motion indication, a no motion indication, a plurality of motion indications, a plurality of no motion indications, and a combination of motion indications and no motion indication;

the second test command commands the user detached monitor device to determine motion of the user detached monitor device;

the second test result is a motion result selected from a group consisting of: a motion indication, a no motion indication, a plurality of motion indications, a plurality of no motion indications, and a combination of motion indications and no motion indication; and

analyzing the combination of the first test result and the second test result includes comparing the second test result with the first test result.

12. The method of claim 1 , wherein:

the first test command commands the user attached monitor device to determine motion of the user attached monitor device;

the first test result includes a first list of time stamped indications obtained over a first period of time by the user attached monitor device, wherein the first list of time stamped indications includes: at least one motion indication, at least one no motion indication, or a combination of at least one motion indication and at least one no motion indication;

the second test command commands the user detached monitor device to determine motion of the user detached monitor device;

the second test result includes a second list of time stamped indications obtained over a second period of time by the user detached monitor device, wherein the second list of time stamped indications includes: at least one motion indication, at least one no motion indication, or a combination of at least one motion indication and at least one no motion indication; and

analyzing the combination of the first test result and the second test result includes comparing at least one entry in the first test result with at least one entry in the second test result where the at least one entry in the first test result corresponds to a time stamp indicating a time similar to a time stamp corresponding to the at least one entry in the second test result.

13. The method of claim 1 , the method further comprising:

providing the user attached monitor device, wherein the user attached monitor device includes: a tamper detection module, a location determination module, a motion determination module, and a strap for attaching the user attached monitor device to the individual; and

wherein a tamper indication is received from the tamper detection module.

14. The method of claim 13 , wherein:

the first test command commands the user attached monitor device to determine a location of the user attached monitor device and a motion status of the user attached monitor device;

the first test result is the location of the user attached monitor device and the motion indication of user detached monitor device;

the second test command commands the user detached monitor device to determine a location of the user detached monitor device and a motion status of the user detached monitor device;

the second test result is the location of the user detached monitor device and the motion indication of user detached monitor device; and

analyzing the combination of the first test result and the second test result includes using at least a combination of: the location of the user attached monitor device, and the motion indication of user attached monitor device, the location of the user detached monitor device, and the motion indication of user detached monitor device to determine that the tamper indication is likely a false alarm.

15. The method of claim 14 , wherein the user attached monitor device further includes a proximity sensor operable to provide a proximity result indicating whether the user attached monitor device is within a given distance of a limb of the individual being monitored, and wherein:

analyzing the combination of the first test result and the second test result includes using at least a combination of: the proximity result, the location of the user attached monitor device, and the motion indication of user attached monitor device, the location of the user detached monitor device, and the motion indication of user detached monitor device to determine that the tamper indication is likely a false alarm.

16. A system for determining operation status of a monitoring system, the system comprising:

a central monitoring station including a processor and a computer readable medium, the computer readable medium including instructions executable by the processor to:

provide a first test command to a user attached monitor device, wherein the user attached monitor device is physically attached to an individual being monitored;

provide a second test command to a user detached monitor device, wherein the user detached monitor device is associated with the individual being monitored;

receive a first test result corresponding to the first test command from the user attached monitor device;

receive a second test result corresponding to the second test command from the user detached monitor device; and

analyze a combination of the first test result and the second test result to determine an operation status of at least one of the user attached monitor device and the user detached monitor device.

17. The system of claim 16 , wherein the computer readable medium further includes instructions executable by the processor to:

provide the user attached monitor device, wherein the user attached monitor device includes: location determination functionality, motion determination functionality, and a strap for attaching the user attached monitor device to the individual.

18. The system of claim 16 , wherein the computer readable medium further includes instructions executable by the processor to:

provide the user detached monitor device, wherein the user detached monitor device includes: location determination functionality, and motion determination functionality.

19. The system of claim 18 , wherein the user detached monitor device is a cellular telephone.

20. The system of claim 16 , wherein the computer readable medium further includes instructions executable by the processor to:

report an analysis result derived from analyzing the combination of the first test result and the second test result, wherein the analysis result is reported from the central monitoring station to a person assigned to monitor the individual.

Assignments (7)
SECURITY INTEREST Recorded Apr 19, 2024
From: B.I. INCORPORATED; BI MOBILE BREATH, INC.
To: CITIZENS BANK, N.A.
Reel/Frame 067172/0575 →
SECURITY INTEREST Recorded Apr 19, 2024
From: B.I. INCORPORATED; BI MOBILE BREATH, INC.
To: ANKURA TRUST COMPANY, LLC
Reel/Frame 067172/0523 →
RELEASE OF SECURITY INTEREST Recorded Apr 19, 2024
From: ALTER DOMUS PRODUCTS CORP.
To: B.I. INCORPORATED; BI MOBILE BREATH, INC.
Reel/Frame 067172/0536 →
RELEASE OF SECURITY INTEREST Recorded Apr 19, 2024
From: ANKURA TRUST COMPANY, LLC
To: B.I. INCORPORATED; BI MOBILE BREATH, INC.
Reel/Frame 067172/0511 →
PATENT SECURITY AGREEMENT Recorded Sep 6, 2022
From: B.I. INCORPORATED; BI MOBILE BREATH, INC.
To: ANKURA TRUST COMPANY
Reel/Frame 061385/0939 →
SECURITY INTEREST Recorded Sep 2, 2022
From: B.I. INCORPORATED; BI MOBILE BREATH, INC.
To: ALTER DOMUS PRODUCTS CORP., AS ADMINISTRATIVE AGENT
Reel/Frame 061373/0314 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded May 7, 2019
From: BUCK, JAMES J., JR; NEWELL, JOSEPH P; PETTIT, DUSTIN; COOKE, MIKE
To: BI INCORPORATED
Reel/Frame 049107/0933 →