IP Library Granted Patent US 10,777,065
Granted Patent B2
US 10,777,065 · App. 16/418,070 · Granted Sep 15, 2020

Fire type detection and notification

Inventors: Prasad Babu Lakshmipathy (Telangana, IN); Sowmya Paturu (Telangana, IN); Saurabh Kumar Sinha (Telangana, IN); Sreeramya Soratkal (Telangana, IN); Jignesh Soneji (Telangana, IN)
Assignee: CARRIER CORPORATION
G08B21/182G06F9/542G08B17/06G08B29/043
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 10,777,065
App. No.
16/418,070
Granted
Sep 15, 2020
Kind
B2
Abstract

According to an aspect, a method of fire type detection and notification includes receiving a plurality of sensor data from a plurality of sensors operable to detect one or more fire conditions. One or more changes in the sensor data are detected from at least one of the sensors. A fire type is classified based on the one or more changes detected in the sensor data. A suppression agent type associated with the fire type is determined. A notification including the fire type and the suppression agent type is output.

Claims (43)

1. A method comprising:

receiving a plurality of sensor data from a plurality of sensors operable to detect one or more fire conditions, wherein the sensors comprise at least one thermographic sensor and at least one Doppler sensor;

detecting one or more changes in the sensor data from at least one of the sensors;

classifying a fire type based on the one or more changes detected in the sensor data by determining whether the temperature gradient is above a gradient limit is detected based on the sensor data from the at least one thermographic sensor, determining whether a Doppler development time is above an upper rate limit based on the sensor data from the at least one Doppler sensor, and determining whether the Doppler development time is below a lower rate limit based on the sensor data from the at least one Doppler sensor;

determining a suppression agent type associated with the fire type; and

outputting a notification comprising the fire type and the suppression agent type.

2. The method of claim 1 , further comprising:

focusing the at least one Doppler sensor toward a fire source based on determining that the temperature gradient is above the gradient limit.

3. The method of claim 1 , wherein the step of classifying a fire type based on the one or more changes detected in the sensor data further comprises determining that the temperature gradient is above the gradient limit and the Doppler development time is below the lower rate limit.

4. The method of claim 3 , wherein the step of outputting a notification comprising the fire type and the suppression agent type further comprises outputting a class A fire type.

5. The method of claim 1 , wherein the sensors comprise at least one hydrocarbon sensor, and the step of classifying a fire type based on the one or more changes detected in the sensor data further comprises:

determining that the temperature gradient is above the gradient limit, the Doppler development time is above the upper rate limit, and hydrocarbon detection is confirmed by the at least one hydrocarbon sensor.

6. The method of claim 5 , wherein the step of outputting a notification comprising the fire type and the suppression agent type further comprises outputting a class B fire type.

7. The method of claim 1 , wherein the sensors comprise at least one hydrocarbon sensor, and the step of classifying a fire type based on the one or more changes detected in the sensor data further comprises:

determining that the temperature gradient is above the gradient limit, the Doppler development time is above the upper rate limit, and hydrocarbon detection is unconfirmed by the at least one hydrocarbon sensor.

8. The method of claim 7 , wherein the step of outputting a notification comprising the fire type and the suppression agent type further comprises outputting a class C fire type.

9. The method of claim 1 , wherein the sensors comprise at least one hydrocarbon sensor, and the step of classifying a fire type based on the one or more changes detected in the sensor data further comprises:

confirming hydrocarbon detection by the at least one hydrocarbon sensor; and

detecting a fire/explosion alarm condition based on a temperature change rate above an explosion threshold.

10. The method of claim 9 , wherein the step of outputting a notification comprising the fire type and the suppression agent type further comprises outputting a class B fire type.

11. The method of claim 1 , further comprising:

identifying a location of the one or more fire conditions based upon a predetermined placement location of the sensors within a structure; and

wherein the notification further comprises an identifier of the location.

12. The method of claim 1 , wherein the notification is output to a user interface through one or more of: a fire alarm panel and a mobile computing device.

13. A system comprising:

a controller configured to establish communication with a plurality of sensors operable to detect one or more fire conditions and at least one alert system, the controller comprising:

a processing system; and

a memory system comprising computer-executable instructions that, when executed by the processing system, cause the processing system to perform operations, the operations comprising:

receiving a plurality of sensor data from the sensors, wherein the sensors comprise at least one thermographic sensor and at least one Doppler sensor;

detecting one or more changes in the sensor data from at least one of the sensors;

classifying a fire type based on the one or more changes detected in the sensor data by determining whether the temperature gradient is above a gradient limit is detected based on the sensor data from the at least one thermographic sensor, determining whether a Doppler development time is above an upper rate limit based on the sensor data from the at least one Doppler sensor, and determining whether the Doppler development time is below a lower rate limit based on the sensor data from the at least one Doppler sensor;

determining a suppression agent type associated with the fire type; and

outputting a notification comprising the fire type and the suppression agent type to the alert system.

14. The system of claim 13 , wherein the controller is further configured to perform the operations comprising:

focusing the at least one Doppler sensor toward a fire source based on determining that the temperature gradient is above the gradient limit.

15. The system of claim 13 , wherein the step of classifying a fire type based on the one or more changes detected in the sensor data further comprises determining that the temperature gradient is above the gradient limit and the Doppler development time is below the lower rate limit.

16. The system of claim 15 , wherein the step of outputting a notification comprising the fire type and the suppression agent type further comprises outputting a class A fire type.

17. The system of claim 13 , wherein the sensors comprise at least one hydrocarbon sensor, and the step of classifying a fire type based on the one or more changes detected in the sensor data further comprises:

determining that the temperature gradient is above the gradient limit, the Doppler development time is above the upper rate limit, and hydrocarbon detection is confirmed by the at least one hydrocarbon sensor.

18. The system of claim 17 , wherein the step of outputting a notification comprising the fire type and the suppression agent type further comprises outputting a class B fire type.

19. The system of claim 13 , wherein the sensors comprise at least one hydrocarbon sensor, and the step of classifying a fire type based on the one or more changes detected in the sensor data further comprises:

determining that the temperature gradient is above the gradient limit, the Doppler development time is above the upper rate limit, and hydrocarbon detection is unconfirmed by the at least one hydrocarbon sensor.

20. The system of claim 19 , wherein the step of outputting a notification comprising the fire type and the suppression agent type further comprises outputting a class C fire type.

Assignments (7)
SECURITY INTEREST Recorded Jul 17, 2025
From: KIDDE-FENWAL, LLC
To: MGG INVESTMENT GROUP LP, AS COLLATERAL AGENT
Reel/Frame 072039/0358 →
RELEASE OF SECURITY INTEREST Recorded Jul 17, 2025
From: CERBERUS BUSINESS FINANCE AGENCY, LLC
To: KIDDE-FENWAL, LLC
Reel/Frame 072039/0243 →
SECURITY INTEREST Recorded Aug 15, 2024
From: KIDDE-FENWAL, LLC
To: CERBERUS BUSINESS FINANCE AGENCY, LLC
Reel/Frame 068657/0151 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Jul 10, 2024
From: KIDDE FENWAL, INC.
To: KIDDE-FENWAL, LLC
Reel/Frame 068263/0432 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Jul 9, 2024
From: KIDDE IP HOLDINGS LIMITED; CARRIER CORPORATION; CARRIER FIRE & SECURITY, LLC; CARRIER GLOBAL CORPORATION
To: KIDDE-FENWAL, INC.
Reel/Frame 068255/0918 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded May 22, 2019
From: LAKSHMIPATHY, PRASAD BABU; PATURU, SOWMYA; SINHA, SAURABH KUMAR; SORATKAL, SREERAMYA; SONEJI, JIGNESH
To: UTC FIRE & SECURITY INDIA LTD.
Reel/Frame 049250/0655 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded May 22, 2019
From: UTC FIRE & SECURITY INDIA LTD.
To: CARRIER CORPORATION
Reel/Frame 049250/0683 →