Tamper alarm for electronic lock

1. An electronic lock comprising:

a latch assembly including a bolt movable between an extended position and a retracted position;

a keypad for receiving a keypad input event; and

a processing unit configured to control the movement of the bolt between the extended position and the retracted position responsive to receiving a valid keypad input event, wherein the processing unit is configured to capture the keypad input event;

wherein, based at least in part on a characteristic of the keypad input event, the processing unit indicates if a tampering event exists, wherein the characteristic includes at least one of an input location on the keypad, an input duration on the keypad, and an input timestamp;

wherein the processing unit indicates a tampering event exists by comparing the input timestamp to an acceptable timestamp window, wherein if the input timestamp of the keypad input event is outside of the acceptable timestamp window, the processing unit indicates the existence of a tampering event; and

wherein the acceptable timestamp window is predetermined and is based, at least in part, on past keypad input events.

2. The electronic lock of claim 1 , wherein the processing unit includes a processor and a memory, wherein the processing unit stores the keypad input event in the memory, and wherein the processor compares at least one characteristic of the keypad input event to a known use profile stored in the memory, the known use profile containing characteristics of past keypad input events.

3. The electronic lock of claim 2 , wherein the processing unit determines the existence of a tampering event if at least one characteristic of the keypad input event does not match the known use profile.

4. The electronic lock of claim 1 , wherein the processing unit indicates a tampering event exists by comparing the input location on the keypad to an acceptable input location, wherein if the input location on the keypad does not match the acceptable input location, the processing unit indicates the existence of a tampering event.

5. The electronic lock of claim 4 , wherein the acceptable input location is based, at least in part, on the valid keypad input.

6. The electronic lock of claim 1 , wherein the processing unit indicates a tampering event exists by comparing the input duration on the keypad to an acceptable input duration value, wherein if the input duration on the keypad exceeds the acceptable input duration value, the processing unit indicates the existence of a tampering event.

7. The electronic lock of claim 6 , wherein the acceptable input duration value is predetermined and is based, at least in part, on past keypad input events.

8. The electronic lock of claim 1 , wherein the processing unit communicates the keypad input event with a distributed computing network, wherein the processing unit indicates if the tampering event exists based at least in part on a received indication of a tampering event from the distributed computing network.

9. The electronic lock of claim 8 , wherein the distributed computing network compares at least one characteristic of the keypad input event to at least one known characteristic of a keypad input event indicative of a tampering event, wherein the at least one known characteristic of a keypad input event indicative of a tampering event is maintained remotely from the electronic lock.

10. The electronic lock of claim 9 , wherein the at least one characteristic of the keypad input event indicative of a tampering event is generated based on an aggregate of keypad input events.

11. The electronic lock of claim 1 , wherein the processing unit activates a tamper alarm if a tampering event exists and outputs the tamper alarm to a remote device, and wherein the remote device is a mobile device.

12. The electronic lock of claim 1 , wherein the processing unit renders the keypad inoperable if a tampering event exists.

13. A method of operating an electronic lock, comprising:

receiving a keypad input event via a keypad, wherein upon receipt of a valid keypad input event, a bolt is moved between an extended position and a retracted position;

determining the existence of a tampering event based at least in part on a characteristic of the keypad input event, wherein the characteristic includes at least one of an input location on the keypad, input duration on the keypad, and an input timestamp, the existence of the tampering event being determined by comparing the input timestamp to an acceptable timestamp window; and

activating a tamper alarm if the input timestamp of the keypad input event is outside of the acceptable timestamp window,

wherein the acceptable timestamp window is predetermined and is based, at least in part, on past keypad input events.

14. The method of claim 13 , further comprising outputting the tamper alarm from the electronic lock via a wireless communication unit.

15. The method of claim 13 , further comprising rendering the keypad inoperable if a tampering event exists.

16. The method of claim 13 , further comprising storing the keypad input event in a local memory, and comparing the at least one characteristic of the keypad input event to a known use profile stored in the local memory, the known use profile containing characteristics of past keypad input events.

17. The method of claim 16 , further comprising activating a tamper alarm if at least one characteristic of the keypad input event does not match the known use profile.

18. The method of claim 13 , further comprising comparing the input location on the keypad to an acceptable input location and activating a tamper alarm if the input location on the keypad does not match the acceptable input location, wherein the acceptable input location is based, at least in part, on the valid keypad input.

19. The method of claim 13 , further comprising comparing the input duration on the keypad to an acceptable input duration value and activating a tamper alarm if the input duration on the keypad exceeds the acceptable input duration value, and wherein the acceptable input duration value is based, at least in part, on past keypad input events.

20. The method of claim 13 , further comprising:

communicating the keypad input event with a distributed computing network;

receiving a tampering event indication from the distributed computing network; and

activating a tamper alarm based at least in part on the received indication of a tampering event from the distributed computing network.

21. The method of claim 13 , further comprising:

comparing the at least one characteristic of the keypad input event to at least one known characteristic of a keypad input event indicative of a tampering event, wherein the at least one known characteristic of a keypad input event indicative of a tampering event is maintained remotely from the electronic lock.

22. The method of claim 21 , wherein the at least one characteristic of the keypad input event indicative of a tampering event is generated based on an aggregate of keypad input events.

23. An electronic lock comprising:

a latch assembly including a bolt movable between an extended position and a retracted position;

an exterior assembly including a tamper sensing device; and

a processing unit configured to control the movement of the bolt between the extended position and the retracted position responsive to receiving a valid input at the user input device; wherein the processing unit is configured to capture the keypad input event;

wherein, based at least in part on a characteristic of the input event, the processing unit indicates if a tampering event exists, wherein the characteristic includes at least one of an input type, an input location, an input duration, and an input timestamp on the tamper sensing device, the existence of the tampering event being determined by comparing the input timestamp to an acceptable timestamp window and the acceptable timestamp window is predetermined and is based, at least in part, on past keypad input events.