IP Library Granted Patent US 10,886,504
Granted Patent B2
US 10,886,504 · App. 16/425,915 · Granted Jan 5, 2021

Systems, devices and methods for the quality assessment of OLED stack films

Inventor: Christopher Cocca (Fremont, CA)
Assignee: Kateeva, Inc.
H01L51/56G06T7/001G06T7/0004G06T7/0008H01L51/0004H01L51/0031G06T2207/10024G06T2207/20072G06T2207/30121
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 10,886,504
App. No.
16/425,915
Granted
Jan 5, 2021
Kind
B2
Abstract

This disclosure provides techniques for assessing quality of a deposited film layer of an organic light emitting diode (“OLED”) device. An image is captured and filtered to identify a deposited layer that is to be analyzed. Image data representing this layer can be optionally converted to brightness (grayscale) data. A gradient function is then applied to emphasize discontinuities in the deposited layer. Discontinuities are then compared to one or more thresholds and used to ascertain quality of the deposited layer, with optional remedial measures then being applied. The disclosed techniques can be applied in situ, to quickly identify potential defects such as delamination before ensuing manufacturing steps are applied. In optional embodiments, remedial measures can be taken dependent on whether defects are determined to exist.

Claims (35)

1. A computer-implemented method for monitoring quality of a film deposited on a substrate, the computer-implemented method comprising:

capturing a digital image of a structure of the film;

processing the digital image to form image data of the digital image;

processing the image data to identify any gradients that satisfy a first gradient threshold;

identifying a quality defect if any gradients which satisfy the first threshold also satisfy a second gradient threshold; and

identifying that the film is not defective with respect to the structure if no gradients satisfy the second gradient threshold.

2. The computer-implemented method of claim 1 , wherein the structure is a portion of the surface of the film.

3. The computer-implemented method of claim 1 , wherein the structure is inside the film.

4. The computer-implemented method of claim 1 , wherein the first gradient threshold is a non-zero threshold.

5. The computer-implemented method of claim 4 , wherein processing the image data comprises applying a filter to the image data to form filtered image data, and applying an operator to the filtered image data to emphasize intensity variation represented in the image data.

6. The computer-implemented method of claim 5 , wherein processing the image data further comprises obtaining the gradients using the operator and comparing an absolute value of a magnitude of each gradient to the first threshold.

7. The computer-implemented method of claim 6 , wherein the operator is a Sobel operator.

8. The computer-implemented method of claim 6 , wherein the substrate is a display substrate, and the structure is a pixel of the display substrate.

9. The computer-implemented method of claim 5 , wherein the filter comprises a boundary detection function.

10. The computer-implemented method of claim 9 , wherein applying the filter comprises using the boundary detection function to form a mask, and using the mask to isolate image data corresponding to the structure.

11. A computer-implemented method for monitoring quality of a film deposited on a substrate, the computer-implemented method comprising:

capturing a digital image of an electro-optical structure of the film;

processing the digital image to form image data of the digital image;

processing the image data to identify any gradients that satisfy a first gradient threshold;

identifying a quality defect if any gradients which satisfy the first threshold also satisfy a second gradient threshold; and

identifying that the film is not defective with respect to the structure if no gradients satisfy the second gradient threshold.

12. The computer-implemented method of claim 11 , wherein the structure is located at the surface of the film.

13. The computer-implemented method of claim 11 , wherein the structure is located inside the film.

14. The computer-implemented method of claim 11 , wherein processing the image data comprises applying a filter to the image data to form filtered image data, applying an operator to the filtered image data to emphasize intensity variation represented in the image data, obtaining the gradients using the operator, and comparing an absolute value of a magnitude of each gradient to the first gradient threshold.

15. The computer-implemented method of claim 14 , wherein the operator is a Sobel operator.

16. The computer-implemented method of claim 14 , wherein the substrate is a display substrate, and the structure is a pixel of the display substrate.

17. The computer-implemented method of claim 14 , wherein the filter comprises a boundary detection function, and applying the filter comprises using the boundary detection function to form a mask, and using the mask to isolate image data corresponding to the structure.

18. The computer-implemented method of claim 11 , wherein processing the image data comprises applying a filter to the image data to form filtered image data, applying an operator to the filtered image data to emphasize intensity variation represented in the image data, obtaining the gradients using the operator, summing the gradients, and comparing the sum to the first gradient threshold or the second gradient threshold.

19. A computer-implemented method for monitoring quality of a film deposited on a display substrate, the computer-implemented method comprising:

capturing a digital image of an portion of the film corresponding to a pixel of the display substrate;

processing the digital image to form image data of the digital image;

processing the image data to identify any gradients that satisfy a first gradient threshold;

identifying a quality defect if any gradients which satisfy the first threshold also satisfy a second gradient threshold; and

identifying that the film is not defective with respect to the structure if no gradients satisfy the second gradient threshold.

20. The computer-implemented method of claim 19 , wherein processing the image data comprises applying a filter to the image data to form filtered image data, applying an operator to the filtered image data to emphasize intensity variation represented in the image data, and obtaining the gradients using the operator.

Assignments (4)
SECURITY INTEREST Recorded Apr 19, 2022
From: KATEEVA CAYMAN HOLDING, INC.
To: HB SOLUTION CO., LTD.
Reel/Frame 059727/0111 →
SECURITY INTEREST Recorded Mar 17, 2022
From: KATEEVA, INC.; KATEEVA CAYMAN HOLDING, INC.
To: SINO XIN JI LIMITED
Reel/Frame 059382/0053 →
SECURITY AGREEMENT Recorded Jan 23, 2020
From: KATEEVA, INC.
To: SINO XIN JI LIMITED
Reel/Frame 051682/0212 →
RELEASE OF SECURITY INTEREST Recorded Jan 22, 2020
From: EAST WEST BANK, A CALIFORNIA BANKING CORPORATION
To: KATEEVA, INC.
Reel/Frame 051664/0802 →