IP Library Granted Patent US 11,727,335
Granted Patent B2
US 11,727,335 · App. 16/453,643 · Granted Aug 15, 2023

Systems and methods for managing energy usage intensity of buildings

Inventors: Subrata Bhattacharya (Navi Mumbai, IN); Tulshiram Vitthalrao Waghmare (Pune, IN)
Assignee: JOHNSON CONTROLS TYCO IP HOLDINGS LLP
G06Q10/06393G06F3/0482G06F21/31H04L67/12
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 11,727,335
App. No.
16/453,643
Granted
Aug 15, 2023
Kind
B2
Abstract

The present disclosure is directed to a method for managing performance indicators of a number of buildings. The method includes providing a user interface to select at least a first physical premise and a second physical premise to be compared from a plurality of physical premises of an organization. The method includes identifying one or more performance indicators associated with an entity of the organization. The method includes collecting data that associates the first and second physical premises with the one or more performance indicators. The method includes displaying, through the user interface, one or more comparison results of the one or more performance indicators among the first and second physical premises.

Claims (50)

1. A method, comprising:

receiving, via a user interface, a user selection of at least a first physical premise and a second physical premise;

collecting data associated with the first and second physical premises, the data associated with a period of time;

normalizing the data based on data related to a location of the first physical premise and a location of the second physical premise;

calculating a first value and a second value of at least one key performance indicator based on the normalized data, the first value associated with the first physical premise and the second value associated with the second physical premise;

detecting a deviation between the first value and the second value that occurred during the period of time;

identifying at least one fault associated with a faulty system or device, the faulty system or device contributing to the deviation between the first value associated with the first physical premise and the second value associated with the second physical premise that occurred during the period of time;

providing, via the user interface, information regarding the identified at least one fault, the information indicating a performance of the system or device contributing to the deviation between the first value and the second value; and

executing a control strategy based on the identified at least one fault, the control strategy comprising at least one of activating or deactivating the system or device, changing a set point for the system or device, changing an energy source of the system or device, diverting activities around the system or device, or adjusting a control signal for the system or device.

2. The method of claim 1 , further comprising determining the first and second physical premises to be compared based on detecting a selection of a building type through the user interface for each of the first and second physical premises.

3. The method of claim 1 , further comprising detecting a presence of authentication credentials of the entity to identify the one or more performance indicators.

4. The method of claim 1 , further comprising identifying the one or more performance indicators inputted by the entity through the user interface.

5. The method of claim 1 , further comprising identifying at least one root cause for one of the first and second physical premises that presents one or more worse comparison results of the one or more performance indicators than the other of the first and second physical premises.

6. The method of claim 5 , further comprising displaying the at least one root cause through the user interface while displaying one or more comparison results of the one or more performance indicators.

7. The method of claim 6 , further comprising:

sending a notification through the user interface indicating the at least one root cause to the entity; and

updating a status of the one or more performance indicators for the one of the first and second physical premises.

8. A computing device comprising:

a memory; and

one or more processors operatively coupled to the memory, the one or more processors configured to:

receive, via a user interface, a user selection of at least a first physical premise and a second physical premise;

collect data associated with the first and second physical premises, the data associated with a period of time;

normalize the data based on data related to a location of the first physical premise and a location of the second physical premise;

calculate a first value and a second value of at least one key performance indicator based on the normalized data, the first value associated with the first physical premise and the second value associated with the second physical premise;

detect a deviation between the first value and the second value that occurred during the period of time;

identify at least one fault associated with a faulty system or device, the faulty system or device contributing to the deviation between the first value associated with the first physical premise and the second value associated with the second physical premise that occurred during the period of time;

provide, via the user interface, information regarding the identified at least one fault, the information indicating a performance of the system or device contributing to the deviation between the first value and the second value; and

execute a control strategy based on the identified at least one fault, the control strategy comprising at least one of activating or deactivating the system or device, changing a set point for the system or device, changing an energy source of the system or device, diverting activities around the system or device, or adjusting a control signal for the system or device.

9. The computing device of claim 8 , wherein the one or more processors are further configured to determine the first and second physical premises to be compared based on detecting a selection of a building type through the user interface for each of the first and second physical premises.

10. The computing device of claim 8 , wherein the one or more processors are further configured to detect a presence of authentication credentials of the entity to identify the one or more performance indicators.

11. The computing device of claim 8 , wherein the one or more processors are further configured to identify the one or more performance indicators inputted by the entity through the user interface.

12. The computing device of claim 8 , wherein the one or more processors are further configured to identify at least one root cause for one of the first and second physical premises that presents one or more worse comparison results of the one or more performance indicators than the other of the first and second physical premises.

13. The computing device of claim 12 , wherein the one or more processors are further configured to display the at least one root cause through the user interface while displaying one or more comparison results of the one or more performance indicators.

14. The computing device of claim 13 , wherein the one or more processors are further configured to:

send a notification through the user interface indicating the at least one root cause to the entity; and

update a status of the one or more performance indicators for the one of the first and second physical premises.

15. A non-transitory computer readable medium storing program instructions for causing one or more processors to:

receive, via a user interface, a user selection of at least a first physical premise and a second physical premise;

collect data that associates the first and second physical premises the data associated with a period of time;

normalize the data based on data related to a location of the first physical premise and a location of the second physical premise;

calculate a first value and a second value of at least one key performance indicator based on the normalized data, the first value associated with the first physical premise and the second value associated with the second physical premise;

detect a deviation between the first value and the second value that occurred during the period of time;

identify at least one fault associated with a faulty system or device, the faulty system or device contributing to the deviation between the first value associated with the first physical premise and the second value associated with the second physical premise that occurred during the period of time;

provide, via the user interface, information regarding the identified at least one fault, the information indicating a performance of the system or device contributing to the deviation between the first value and the second value; and

execute a control strategy based on the identified at least one fault, the control strategy comprising at least one of activating or deactivating the system or device, changing a set point for the system or device, changing an energy source of the system or device, diverting activities around the system or device, or adjusting a control signal for the system or device.

16. The non-transitory computer readable medium of claim 15 , wherein the program instructions further causes the one or more processors to determine the first and second physical premises to be compared based on detecting a selection of a building type through the user interface for each of the first and second physical premises.

17. The non-transitory computer readable medium of claim 15 , wherein the program instructions further causes the one or more processors to detect a presence of authentication credentials of the entity to identify the one or more performance indicators.

18. The non-transitory computer readable medium of claim 15 , wherein the program instructions further causes the one or more processors to identify the one or more performance indicators inputted by the entity through the user interface.

19. The non-transitory computer readable medium of claim 15 , wherein the program instructions further causes the one or more processors to identify at least one root cause for one of the first and second physical premises that presents one or more worse comparison results of the one or more performance indicators than the other of the first and second physical premises.

20. The non-transitory computer readable medium of claim 15 , wherein the program instructions further causes the one or more processors to display the at least one root cause through the user interface while displaying one or more comparison results of the one or more performance indicators.

Assignments (3)
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Apr 9, 2024
From: JOHNSON CONTROLS TYCO IP HOLDINGS LLP
To: TYCO FIRE & SECURITY GMBH
Reel/Frame 067056/0552 →
NUNC PRO TUNC ASSIGNMENT Recorded Feb 4, 2022
From: JOHNSON CONTROLS TECHNOLOGY COMPANY
To: JOHNSON CONTROLS TYCO IP HOLDINGS LLP
Reel/Frame 058959/0764 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Mar 20, 2020
From: BHATTACHARYA, SUBRATA; WAGHMARE, TULSHIRAM VITTHALRAO
To: JOHNSON CONTROLS TECHNOLOGY COMPANY
Reel/Frame 052175/0587 →
Cited By (1)
US 12,406,414