IP Library Granted Patent US 10,983,506
Granted Patent B2
US 10,983,506 · App. 16/454,166 · Granted Apr 20, 2021

Methods and software for manufacturing a discrete object from an additively manufactured body of material including a precursor to a discrete object and a reference feature(s)

Inventors: James L Jacobs (Amherst, NH); Arthur Richard Baker, III (Excelsior, MN)
Assignee: Proto Labs, Inc.
G05B19/4099B33Y40/20B33Y50/00B33Y10/00G05B2219/35134G05B2219/49008
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 10,983,506
App. No.
16/454,166
Granted
Apr 20, 2021
Kind
B2
Abstract

An automated manufacturing system for manufacturing a discrete object is configured to manufacture a reference feature on a precursor to the discrete object. Reference feature is used to place the precursor at a subtractive manufacturing machine; the reference feature may be based on a locating feature at the subtractive manufacturing machine. Manufacturing reference feature is accomplished by automatedly detecting one or more critical-to-quality features and manufacturing the reference feature based on the one or more detected critical-to-quality features.

Claims (67)

1. An automated manufacturing system for manufacturing a discrete object from an additively manufactured body of material including a precursor to a discrete object and at least a reference feature, the system comprising:

an automated manufacturing device configured to manufacture a body of material including the precursor to a discrete object and the at least a reference feature, wherein manufacturing the body of material further comprises:

receiving at least a precursor to a discrete object, a graphical computer model of the at least a precursor to the discrete object, and a graphical computer model of the discrete object;

identifying at least a first feature and at least a second feature in the graphical computer model of the discrete object;

automatedly determining that the at least a first feature includes at least a critical-to-quality feature in the graphical computer model of the discrete object wherein automatedly detecting the at least a critical-to-quality feature further comprises:

extracting a geometric description of at least a surface feature depicted in the graphical computer model;

comparing the geometric description of the at least a surface feature to a geometric description of at least a stored critical-to-quality shape description wherein the at least a stored critical-to-quality shape description corresponds to a shape that requires manufacture to a first tolerance; and

determining that the geometric description of the at least a surface feature matches the geometric description of the at least a stored critical-to-quality shape description;

automatedly determining that the at least a second feature is a non-critical-to-quality feature to be manufactured to a second tolerance which is lower than the first tolerance;

automatedly generating a graphical representation of the at least a reference feature on the graphical model of the at least a precursor to the discrete object as a function of the at least a critical-to-quality feature;

manufacturing the at least a reference feature on the at least a precursor to the discrete object as a function of the graphical representation of the at least a reference feature; and

forming the discrete object from the body of material at a subtractive manufacturing device when the body of material is located at the subtractive manufacturing device using the at least a reference feature, wherein forming further comprises forming the at least a critical-to-quality feature.

2. The system of claim 1 , wherein receiving the at least a precursor to the discrete object further comprises manufacturing the at least a precursor to the discrete object.

3. The system of claim 2 , wherein manufacturing the at least a precursor to the discrete object further comprises additively manufacturing the at least a precursor to the discrete object.

4. The system of claim 2 , wherein manufacturing the at least a precursor to the discrete object further comprises subtractively manufacturing the at least a precursor to the discrete object.

5. The system of claim 1 , wherein detecting the at least a critical-to-quality feature further comprises detecting at least a join locus.

6. The system of claim 5 , wherein detecting the at least a join locus further comprises:

extracting a first geometric description of at least a first surface feature depicted in the graphical computer model;

comparing the first geometric description of the at least a surface feature to a second geometric description of at least a second surface feature of a graphical representation of an object; and

determining that the at least a first surface feature and at least a second surface feature are complementary forms.

7. The system of claim 5 , wherein:

the graphical computer model depicts an object mating with the graphical representation of the at least a precursor part; and

detecting the at least a join locus further comprises identifying a graphical depiction of a surface feature mating with the second object.

8. The system of claim 5 , wherein detecting the at least a join locus further comprises:

extracting a geometric description of at least a surface feature depicted in the graphical computer model;

comparing the geometric description of the at least a surface feature to a geometric description of at least a fastening feature shape description; and

determining that the geometric description of the at least a surface feature matches the geometric description of the at least a fastening feature shape description.

9. The system of claim 1 , wherein the at least a critical-to-quality feature includes a plurality of critical-to-quality features, and further comprising:

presenting the plurality of critical-to-quality features to a user via a user interface; and

receiving, via the user interface, a user selection of a critical-to-quality feature from the plurality of critical-to-quality features.

10. The system of claim 1 , wherein receiving the graphical representation of the at least a reference feature further comprises generating the graphical representation of the at least a reference feature as a function of at least a locating feature at a subtractive manufacturing device.

11. A method of manufacturing a discrete object from a body of material including a precursor to a discrete object and at least a reference feature, the method comprising:

receiving, at an automated manufacturing system, a graphical computer model of the at least a precursor to the discrete object and a graphical computer model of the discrete object;

identifying, by the automated manufacturing system, at least a first feature and at least a second feature in the graphical computer model of the discrete object;

automatedly determining, by the automated manufacturing system, that the at least a first feature includes at least a critical-to-quality feature in the graphical computer model of the discrete object wherein automatedly detecting the at least a critical-to-quality feature further comprises:

extracting a first geometric description of at least a surface feature depicted in the graphical computer model;

comparing the first geometric description to a second geometric description of at least a second surface feature of a graphical representation of an object, wherein the at least a second surface feature of the graphical representation of an object corresponds to a shape that requires manufacture to a first tolerance; and

determining that the at least a first surface feature and second at least a second feature are complementary forms;

automatedly determining, by the automated manufacturing system, that the at least a second feature is a non-critical-to-quality feature to be manufactured to a second tolerance which is lower than the first tolerance; and

automatedly generating, at the automated manufacturing system, a graphical representation of the at least a reference feature on a graphical computer model of the precursor to the discrete object as a function of the at least a critical-to-quality feature.

12. The method of claim 11 , wherein detecting the at least a critical-to-quality feature further comprises:

extracting a geometric description of at least a surface feature depicted in the graphical computer model;

comparing the geometric description of the at least a surface feature to a geometric description of at least a stored critical-to-quality shape description; and

determining that the geometric description of the at least a surface feature matches the geometric description of the at least a stored critical-to-quality shape description.

13. The method of claim 11 , wherein detecting the at least a critical-to-quality feature further comprises detecting at least a join locus.

14. The method of claim 13 , wherein:

the graphical computer model depicts a second object mating with the graphical representation of the at least a precursor part; and

detecting the at least a join locus further comprises identifying a graphical depiction of a surface feature mating with the second object.

15. The method of claim 13 , wherein detecting the at least a join locus further comprises:

extracting a geometric description of at least a surface feature depicted in the graphical computer model;

comparing the geometric description of the at least a surface feature to a geometric description of at least a fastening feature shape description; and

determining that the geometric description of the at least a surface feature matches the geometric description of the at least a fastening feature shape description.

16. The method of claim 11 , wherein the at least a critical-to-quality feature includes a plurality of critical-to-quality features, and further comprising:

presenting the plurality of critical-to-quality features to a user via a user interface; and

receiving, via the user interface, a user selection of a critical-to-quality feature from the plurality of critical-to-quality features.

17. The method of claim 11 further comprising manufacturing, by the automated manufacturing system, the at least a reference feature on the at least a precursor, as a function of the graphical representation of the at least a reference feature.

18. The method of claim 11 further comprising manufacturing, by the automated manufacturing system and using a subtractive manufacturing device, the discrete object.

19. An automated manufacturing system for manufacturing a discrete object from an additively manufactured body of material including at least a precursor to a discrete object and at least a reference feature, the automated manufacturing system comprising:

an automated manufacturing device configured to manufacture a body of material including at least a precursor to a discrete object and at least a reference feature, wherein manufacturing the body of material further comprises:

receiving at least a precursor to a discrete object, a graphical computer model of the at least a precursor to the discrete object, and a graphical computer model of the discrete object;

identifying at least a first feature and at least a second feature in the graphical computer model of the discrete object;

automatedly determining that the at least a first feature includes at least a critical-to-quality feature in the graphical computer model of the discrete object, wherein automatedly detecting the at least a critical-to-quality feature further comprises:

extracting a geometric description of at least a surface feature depicted in the graphical computer model;

comparing the geometric description of the at least a surface feature to a geometric description of at least a stored critical-to-quality shape description wherein the at least a stored critical-to-quality shape description corresponds to a shape that requires manufacture to a first tolerance; and

determining that the geometric description of the at least a surface feature matches the geometric description of the at least a stored critical-to-quality shape description;

automatedly determining that the at least a second feature is a non-critical-to-quality feature to be manufactured to a second tolerance which is lower than the first tolerance; and

automatedly generating a graphical representation of the at least a reference feature on a graphical model of the at least a precursor to the discrete object as a function of the at least a critical-to-quality feature.

Assignments (3)
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Mar 30, 2020
From: BAKER, ARTHUR RICHARD, III
To: PROTO LABS, INC.
Reel/Frame 052257/0434 →
CORRECTIVE ASSIGNMENT TO CORRECT THE RECEIVING PARTY DATA PREVIOUSLY RECORDED AT REEL: 050200 FRAME: 0878. ASSIGNOR(S) HEREBY CONFIRMS THE ASSIGNMENT. Recorded Sep 6, 2019
From: JACOBS, JAMES L, II
To: PROTO LABS INC.
Reel/Frame 050300/0584 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Aug 28, 2019
From: JACOBS, JAMES L, II
To: DESPREZ LLC
Reel/Frame 050200/0878 →
Continuity (5)
Continuation In Part 15936965 · Mar 27, 2018
Continuation In Part 14172462 · Feb 4, 2014
Provisional Application 62513694 · Jun 1, 2017
Provisional Application 61891453 · Oct 16, 2013
Related Publication 20200192332A1 · Jun 18, 2020