Method and device for determining utility of replacement of battery pack for electric vehicle

1. A method for estimating a utility of replacement of a battery pack for an electric vehicle, comprising the following steps:

acquiring state data associated with a first battery pack and a second battery pack, the state data comprises usage history of the first battery pack and performance parameters of the first battery pack and the second battery pack; and

determining a utility value according to the state data, wherein the utility value is used to characterize an impact degree for replacing the first battery pack with the second battery pack on service efficiency and service life of a battery pack set to which the first battery pack and the second battery pack belong,

wherein the performance parameters of the first battery pack and the second battery pack comprise current energy storage values of the first battery pack and the second battery pack and a range factor and a power factor of the second battery pack, the range factor increases as the maximum driving range of the second battery pack increases, the power factor increases as the maximum discharging power of the second battery pack increases, and the utility value increases as a difference between the current energy storage values of the first battery pack and the second battery pack, the range factor, and the power factor increase.

2. The method according to claim 1 , wherein the usage history of the first battery pack is a time loss factor and a range loss factor, the time loss factor increases as an accumulated usage time from the first battery pack is put to use for the last time increases, the range loss factor increases as an accumulated driving range from the first battery pack is put to use for the last time increases, and the utility value decreases as the time loss factor and the range loss factor increase.

3. A charging management method, comprising the following steps:

performing the method according to claim 2 ; and

correcting, by using the utility value, the charging for replacement of the first battery pack with the second battery pack.

4. The method according to claim 1 , wherein if a condition Max (E 1 , E 2 , E Average )−Min (E 1 , E 2 , E Average )/E Average ≥λ is satisfied, a difference ΔE between the current energy storage values of the first battery pack and the second battery pack is determined in the following manner:

Δ E =( E new −E used )/ E Average

where E 1 is the maximum energy storage value of a new battery pack, E 2 is the maximum energy storage value of a used battery pack, E Average is an average value of maximum energy storage values of battery packs in a battery pack set to which the new battery pack and the used battery pack belong, λ is a constant that can be experimentally determined, E used is a current energy storage value of the used battery pack, and E new is a current energy storage value of the new battery pack.

5. The method according to claim 1 , wherein if a condition Max (E 1 , E 2 , E Average )−Min (E 1 , E 2 , E Average )/E Average <λ is satisfied, a difference ΔE between the current energy storage values of the first battery pack and the second battery pack is determined in the following manner:

Δ E =SOC new −SOC used

where E 1 is the maximum energy storage value of a new battery pack, E 2 is the maximum energy storage value of a used battery pack, E Average is an average value of maximum energy storage values of battery packs in a battery pack set to which the new battery pack and the used battery pack belong, λ is a constant that can be experimentally determined, SOC new is an SOC of the new battery pack, and SOC used is an SOC of the used battery pack.

6. The method according to claim 1 , wherein a utility value F is determined in the following manner:

F=ΔE×Fr×Fp /( Dt×Dr )

where ΔE is a difference between the current energy storage values of the first battery pack and the second battery pack, Fr is the range factor of the second battery pack, Fp is the power factor of the second battery pack, Dt is a time loss factor of the first battery pack, and Dr is a range loss factor of the first battery pack.

7. A charging management method, comprising the following steps:

performing the method according to claim 1 ; and

correcting, by using the utility value, the charging for replacement of the first battery pack with the second battery pack.

8. The charging management method according to claim 7 , wherein the charging for replacement of the first battery pack with the second battery pack is corrected in the following manner:

Ps=Pb×F

where Pb is a basic amount that needs to be charged or basic points that need to be deducted for replacement of the first battery pack with the second battery pack, and Ps is a corrected value of the basic amount that needs to be charged or the basic points that need to be deducted for replacement of the first battery pack with the second battery pack.

9. The charging management method according to claim 7 , wherein the charging for replacement of the first battery pack with the second battery pack is corrected in the following manner:

Ps=Pb×F+Ph+Pl

where Pb is a basic amount that needs to be charged or basic points that need to be deducted for replacement of the first battery pack with the second battery pack, Ps is a corrected value of the basic amount that needs to be charged or the basic points that need to be deducted for replacement of the first battery pack with the second battery pack, Ph is a weighted value for human interference by which the first battery pack is replaced with the second battery pack, and Pl is a weighted value for a location where the first battery pack is replaced with the second battery pack.

10. A charging management method, comprising the following steps:

performing the method according to claim 1 ; and

correcting, by using the utility value, the charging for replacement of the first battery pack with the second battery pack.

11. A device for estimating a utility of replacement of a battery pack for an electric vehicle, comprising:

a memory configured to store state data associated with a first battery pack and a second battery pack, the state data comprising usage history of the first battery pack and performance parameters of the first battery pack and the second battery pack; and

a processor configured to determine a utility value according to the state data, wherein the utility value is used to characterize a degree of impact of an operation of replacing the first battery pack with the second battery pack on service efficiency and service life of a battery pack set to which the first battery pack and the second battery pack belong,

wherein the performance parameters of the first battery pack and the second battery pack comprise current energy storage values of the first battery pack and the second battery pack and a range factor and a power factor of the second battery pack, the range factor increases as the maximum driving range of the second battery pack increases, the power factor increases as the maximum discharging power of the second battery pack increases, and the utility value increases as a difference between the current energy storage values of the first battery pack and the second battery pack, the range factor, and the power factor increase.

12. The device according to claim 11 , wherein the usage history of the first battery pack is a time loss factor and a range loss factor, the time loss factor increases as an accumulated usage time since the first battery pack is put to use for the last time increases, the range loss factor increases as an accumulated driving range since the first battery pack is put to use for the last time increases, and the utility value decreases as the time loss factor and the range loss factor increase.

13. The device according to claim 11 , wherein if a condition Max (E 1 , E 2 , E Average )−Min (E 1 , E 2 , E Average )/E Average ≥λ is satisfied, the processor determines a difference ΔE between the current energy storage values of the first battery pack and the second battery pack in the following manner:

Δ E =( E new −E used )/ E Average

where E 1 is the maximum energy storage value of a new battery pack, E 2 is the maximum energy storage value of a used battery pack, E Average is an average value of maximum energy storage values of battery packs in a battery pack set to which the new battery pack and the used battery pack belong, λ is a constant that can be experimentally determined, E used is a current energy storage value of the used battery pack, and E new is a current energy storage value of the new battery pack.

14. The device according to claim 11 , wherein if a condition Max (E 1 , E 2 , E Average )−Min (E 1 , E 2 , E Average )/E Average <λ is satisfied, the processor determines a difference ΔE between the current energy storage values of the first battery pack and the second battery pack in the following manner:

Δ E =SOC new −SOC used

where E 1 is the maximum energy storage value of a new battery pack, E 2 is the maximum energy storage value of a used battery pack, E Average is an average value of maximum energy storage values of battery packs in a battery pack set to which the new battery pack and the used battery pack belong, λ is a constant that can be experimentally determined, SOC new is a state of charge (SOC) of the new battery pack, and SOC used is an SOC of the used battery pack.

15. The device according to claim 11 , wherein the processor determines a utility value F in the following manner:

F=ΔE×Fr×Fp /( Dt×Dr )

where ΔE is a difference between the current energy storage values of the first battery pack and the second battery pack, Fr is the range factor of the second battery pack, Fp is the power factor of the second battery pack, Dt is a time loss factor of the first battery pack, and Dr is a range loss factor of the first battery pack.

16. A charging management system, comprising:

the device according to claim 11 ; and

a user management module coupled to the device,

wherein the user management module is configured to correct, by using the utility value, the charging for an operation of replacing the first battery pack with the second battery pack.

17. The charging management system according to claim 16 , wherein the user management module is configured to correct the charging for replacement of the first battery pack with the second battery pack in the following manner:

Ps=Pb×F

where Pb is a basic amount that needs to be charged or basic points that need to be deducted for replacement of the first battery pack with the second battery pack, and Ps is a corrected value of the basic amount that needs to be charged or the basic points that need to be deducted for replacement of the first battery pack with the second battery pack.

18. The charging management system according to claim 16 , wherein the user management module is configured to determine and correct the charging for replacement of the first battery pack with the second battery pack in the following manner:

Ps=Pb×F+Ph+Pl

where Pb is a basic amount that needs to be charged or basic points that need to be deducted for replacement of the first battery pack with the second battery pack, Ps is a corrected value of the basic amount that needs to be charged or the basic points that need to be deducted for replacement of the first battery pack with the second battery pack, Ph is a weighted value for human interference by which the first battery pack is replaced with the second battery pack, and Pl is a weighted value for a location where the first battery pack is replaced with the second battery pack.