IP Library Granted Patent US 11,240,259
Granted Patent B2
US 11,240,259 · App. 16/508,398 · Granted Feb 1, 2022

Self organizing learning topologies

Inventors: Jean-Philippe Vasseur (Anchorage, AK); Sébastien Gay (Les Rousses, FR); Grégory Mermoud (Veyras, CH); Pierre-André Savalle (Rueil-Malmaison, FR); Alexandre Honoré (Schaerbeek, BE); Fabien Flacher (Antony, FR)
Assignee: Cisco Technology, Inc.
H04L63/1425H04L41/0631H04L41/12H04L41/147H04L63/1458
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 11,240,259
App. No.
16/508,398
Granted
Feb 1, 2022
Kind
B2
Abstract

In one embodiment, a networking device at an edge of a network generates a first set of feature vectors using information regarding one or more characteristics of host devices in the network. The networking device forms the host devices into device clusters dynamically based on the first set of feature vectors. The networking device generates a second set of feature vectors using information regarding traffic associated with the device clusters. The networking device models interactions between the device clusters using a plurality of anomaly detection models that are based on the second set of feature vectors.

Claims (42)

1. A method comprising:

receiving, at a device, a plurality of edge identifiers for a plurality of edges, wherein a particular edge represents an interaction between two or more device clusters formed by one or more routers, each device cluster comprising a plurality of host devices having similar characteristics;

selecting, by the device, a set of edges from among the plurality of edges that are expected to exhibit similar behaviors;

correlating, by the device, received information regarding anomaly detection models associated with the selected set of edges, to determine a measure of confidence in the anomaly detection models associated with the selected set of edges based on an assessment of how similar the anomaly detection models are to each another;

providing, by the device, a notification that comprises the measure of confidence; and

providing, by the device, a clustering policy to the one or more routers, wherein the one or more routers are configured to form the device clusters based on the provided clustering policy.

2. The method as in claim 1 , further comprising:

requesting, by the device, the edge identifiers from a plurality of routers configured to form the device clusters.

3. The method as in claim 1 , wherein correlating the received information regarding the anomaly detection models associated with the selected set of edges comprises:

determining, by the device, the measure of confidence in the anomaly detection models based on a comparison between an average centroid distance of the models to an average center of the models.

4. The method as in claim 3 , further comprising:

identifying, by the device, a particular one of the anomaly detection models as anomalous based on a comparison between a centroid distance of the particular model to the average center of the models.

5. The method as in claim 4 , wherein the notification identifies the particular anomaly detection model as anomalous.

6. An apparatus, comprising:

one or more network interfaces to communicate with a network;

a processor coupled to the network interfaces and configured to execute one or more processes; and

a memory configured to store a process executable by the processor, the process when executed operable to:

receive a plurality of edge identifiers for a plurality of edges, wherein a particular edge represents an interaction between two or more device clusters formed by one or more routers, each device cluster comprising a plurality of host devices having similar characteristics;

select a set of edges from among the plurality of edges that are expected to exhibit similar behaviors;

correlate received information regarding anomaly detection models associated with the selected set of edges, to determine a measure of confidence in the anomaly detection models associated with the selected set of edges based on an assessment of how similar the anomaly detection models are to each another;

provide a notification that comprises the measure of confidence; and

provide a clustering policy to the one or more routers, wherein the one or more routers are configured to form the device clusters based on the provided clustering policy.

7. The apparatus as in claim 6 , the process is further operable to:

request the edge identifiers from a plurality of routers configured to form the device clusters.

8. The apparatus as in claim 6 , wherein the process is operable to correlate the received information regarding the anomaly detection models associated with the selected set of edges by:

determining the measure of confidence in the anomaly detection models based on a comparison between an average centroid distance of the models to an average center of the models.

9. The apparatus as in claim 8 , the process further operable to:

identify a particular one of the anomaly detection models as anomalous based on a comparison between a centroid distance of the particular model to the average center of the models.

10. The apparatus as in claim 9 , wherein the notification identifies the particular anomaly detection model as anomalous.

11. A tangible, non-transitory, computer-readable medium storing program instructions that, when executed by a device in a network perform a process comprising:

receiving, at a device, a plurality of edge identifiers for a plurality of edges, wherein a particular edge represents an interaction between two or more device clusters formed by one or more routers, each device cluster comprising a plurality of host devices having similar characteristics;

selecting, by the device, a set of edges from among the plurality of edges that are expected to exhibit similar behaviors;

correlating, by the device, received information regarding anomaly detection models associated with the selected set of edges, to determine a measure of confidence in the anomaly detection models associated with the selected set of edges based on an assessment of how similar the anomaly detection models are to each another;

providing, by the device, a notification that comprises the measure of confidence; and

providing, by the device, a clustering policy to the one or more routers, wherein the one or more routers are configured to form the device clusters based on the provided clustering policy.

12. The tangible, non-transitory, computer-readable medium as in claim 11 , the process further comprising:

requesting, by the device, the edge identifiers from a plurality of routers configured to form the device clusters.

13. The tangible, non-transitory, computer-readable medium as in 11 , wherein correlating, by the device, the received information regarding the anomaly detection models associated with the selected set of edges by:

determining, by the device, the measure of confidence in the anomaly detection models based on a comparison between an average centroid distance of the models to an average center of the models.

14. The tangible, non-transitory, computer-readable medium as in claim 13 , the process further comprising:

identifying, by the device, a particular one of the anomaly detection models as anomalous based on a comparison between a centroid distance of the particular model to the average center of the models.

15. The tangible, non-transitory, computer-readable medium as in claim 14 , wherein the notification identifies the particular anomaly detection model as anomalous.

Assignments (1)
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Aug 12, 2019
From: VASSEUR, JEAN-PHILIPPE; GAY, SÉBASTIEN; MERMOUD, GRÉGORY; SAVALLE, PIERRE-ANDRÉ; HONORÉ, ALEXANDRE; FLACHER, FABIEN
To: CISCO TECHNOLOGY, INC.
Reel/Frame 050028/0173 →
Continuity (3)
Division 15176678 · Jun 8, 2016
Provisional Application 62313537 · Mar 25, 2016
Related Publication 20190334941A1 · Oct 31, 2019