IP Library Granted Patent US 10,911,496
Granted Patent B2
US 10,911,496 · App. 16/538,434 · Granted Feb 2, 2021

Technologies for privacy-preserving security policy evaluation

Inventors: Sudeep Das (Cupertino, CA); Rajesh Poornachandran (Portland, OR); Ned M. Smith (Beaverton, OR); Vincent J. Zimmer (Federal Way, WA); Pramod Sharma (Tanakpur, IN); Arthur Zeigler (Salem, OR); Sumant Vashisth (Portland, OR); Simon Hunt (Naples, FL)
Assignee: MCAFEE, LLC
H04L63/20H04L63/0227H04L63/0428H04L63/145G06F2221/21
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 10,911,496
App. No.
16/538,434
Granted
Feb 2, 2021
Kind
B2
Abstract

Technologies for privacy-safe security policy evaluation are disclosed herein. An example apparatus includes at least one processor, and memory including instructions that, when executed, cause the at least one processor to curry a security policy function to generate a privacy-safe curried function set, the security policy function to generate a security policy as a function of a plurality of policy parameters, the privacy-safe curried function set including a non-sensitive function that receives a non-sensitive parameter of the plurality of policy parameters as an argument, the privacy-safe curried function set further including a sensitive function that receives a sensitive parameter of the plurality of policy parameters as an argument; access unencrypted parameter data corresponding to the non-sensitive parameter of the plurality of policy parameters; evaluate the non-sensitive function of the privacy-safe curried function set to generate the sensitive function; and provide the sensitive function to a client computing device.

Claims (46)

1. An apparatus for performing privacy-safe cloud threat analysis, the apparatus comprising:

at least one processor; and

memory including instructions that, when executed, cause the at least one processor to:

curry a security policy function to generate a privacy-safe curried function set, the security policy function to generate a security policy based on a plurality of policy parameters, the privacy-safe curried function set including one or more first functions having a respective non-sensitive parameter of the plurality of policy parameters as respective first arguments, and the privacy-safe curried function set further including one or more second functions having a respective sensitive parameter of the plurality of policy parameters as respective second arguments;

access unencrypted parameter data corresponding to one or more of the non-sensitive parameters;

evaluate the one or more first functions with the unencrypted parameter data to generate the one or more second functions; and

provide the one or more second functions to a client computing device.

2. The apparatus of claim 1 , wherein the at least one processor is to access a client data classification policy, the client data classification policy to identify the one or more of the non-sensitive parameters and one or more of the sensitive parameters.

3. The apparatus of claim 1 , wherein the at least one processor is to determine the security policy function.

4. The apparatus of claim 1 , wherein the at least one processor is to:

access encrypted parameter data corresponding to one or more of the sensitive parameters; and

provide the encrypted parameter data to the client computing device.

5. The apparatus of claim 1 , wherein the at least one processor is to access the unencrypted parameter data from a trusted mediator device.

6. The apparatus of claim 1 , wherein the at least one processor is to access the unencrypted parameter data from an external data source.

7. The apparatus of claim 1 , wherein the at least one processor is to provide the one or more second functions to the client computing device via a trusted mediator device.

8. The apparatus of claim 1 , wherein the at least one processor is to negotiate the security policy with the client computing device in response to providing the one or more second functions to the client computing device.

9. The apparatus of claim 1 , wherein the at least one processor is to:

curry the security policy function at a trusted execution environment of the apparatus;

access the unencrypted parameter data at the trusted execution environment;

evaluate the one or more first functions at the trusted execution environment; and

provide the one or more second functions from the trusted execution environment.

10. The apparatus of claim 9 , wherein the trusted execution environment includes a secure enclave established by secure enclave support of the apparatus.

11. At least one machine readable storage medium comprising instructions that, when executed, cause at least one processor to at least:

curry a security policy function to generate a privacy-safe curried function set, the security policy function to generate a security policy as a function of a plurality of policy parameters, the privacy-safe curried function set including one or more first functions that receive a respective non-sensitive parameter of the plurality of policy parameters as an argument, and the privacy-safe curried function set further including one or more second functions that receive a respective sensitive parameter of the plurality of policy parameters as a different argument;

access unencrypted parameter data corresponding to one or more of the non-sensitive parameters of the plurality of policy parameters;

evaluate the one or more first functions of the privacy-safe curried function set with the unencrypted parameter data to generate the one or more second functions; and

provide the one or more second functions of the privacy-safe curried function set to a client computing device.

12. The at least one machine readable storage medium of claim 11 , wherein the instructions, when executed, cause the at least one processor to access a client data classification policy, the client data classification policy is to identify the one or more of the non-sensitive parameters and one or more of the sensitive parameters of the plurality of policy parameters.

13. The at least one machine readable storage medium of claim 11 , wherein the instructions, when executed, cause the at least one processor to determine the security policy function.

14. The at least one machine readable storage medium of claim 11 , wherein the instructions, when executed, cause the at least one processor to at least:

access encrypted parameter data corresponding to one or more of the sensitive parameters; and

provide the encrypted parameter data to the client computing device.

15. The at least one machine readable storage medium of claim 11 , wherein the instructions, when executed, cause the at least one processor to access the unencrypted parameter data from a trusted mediator device.

16. The at least one machine readable storage medium of claim 11 , wherein the instructions, when executed, cause the at least one processor to access the unencrypted parameter data from an external data source.

17. The at least one machine readable storage medium of claim 11 , wherein the instructions, when executed, cause the at least one processor to provide the one or more second functions to the client computing device via a trusted mediator device.

18. The at least one machine readable storage medium of claim 11 , wherein the instructions, when executed, cause the at least one processor to negotiate the security policy with the client computing device in response to providing the one or more second functions to the client computing device.

19. The at least one machine readable storage medium of claim 11 , wherein the instructions, when executed, cause the at least one processor to at least:

curry the security policy function at a trusted execution environment associated with the at least one processor;

access the unencrypted parameter data at the trusted execution environment;

evaluate the one or more first functions of the privacy-safe curried function set at the trusted execution environment; and

provide the one or more second functions from the trusted execution environment.

20. A method for privacy-safe cloud threat analysis, the method comprising:

currying, by executing an instruction with at least one processor, a security policy function to generate a privacy-safe curried function set, the security policy function to generate a security policy as a function of a plurality of policy parameters, the privacy-safe curried function set including one or more non-sensitive functions that receive a respective non-sensitive parameter of the plurality of policy parameters as respective first arguments, and the privacy-safe curried function set further including one or more sensitive functions that receive a respective sensitive parameter of the plurality of policy parameters as respective second arguments;

accessing, by executing an instruction with the at least one processor, parameter data corresponding to one or more of the non-sensitive parameters of the plurality of policy parameters, the parameter data being unencrypted;

evaluating, by executing an instruction with the at least one processor, the one or more non-sensitive functions of the privacy-safe curried function set with the parameter data to generate the one or more sensitive functions; and

transmitting, by executing an instruction with the at least one processor, the one or more sensitive functions of the privacy-safe curried function set to a client computing device.

Assignments (16)
RELEASE OF SECURITY INTEREST Recorded Aug 16, 2024
From: STG PARTNERS, LLC
To: MUSARUBRA US LLC; SKYHIGH SECURITY LLC
Reel/Frame 068671/0435 →
TERMINATION AND RELEASE OF FIRST LIEN SECURITY INTEREST IN CERTAIN PATENTS RECORDED AT REEL 057453, FRAME 0053 Recorded Aug 15, 2024
From: UBS AG, STAMFORD BRANCH, AS COLLATERAL AGENT
To: MUSARUBRA US LLC
Reel/Frame 068655/0413 →
TERMINATION AND RELEASE OF SECOND LIEN SECURITY INTEREST IN CERTAIN PATENTS RECORDED AT REEL 056990, FRAME 0960 Recorded Aug 15, 2024
From: UBS AG, STAMFORD BRANCH, AS COLLATERAL AGENT
To: MUSARUBRA US LLC
Reel/Frame 068655/0430 →
INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY ASSIGNMENT AGREEMENT Recorded Aug 15, 2024
From: MUSARUBRA US LLC
To: MAGENTA SECURITY INTERMEDIATE HOLDINGS LLC
Reel/Frame 068656/0098 →
INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY ASSIGNMENT AGREEMENT Recorded Aug 15, 2024
From: MAGENTA SECURITY INTERMEDIATE HOLDINGS LLC
To: MAGENTA SECURITY HOLDINGS LLC
Reel/Frame 068656/0920 →
FIRST LIEN PATENT SECURITY AGREEMENT Recorded Aug 15, 2024
From: MAGENTA SECURITY HOLDINGS LLC; SKYHIGH SECURITY LLC
To: UBS AG, STAMFORD BRANCH, AS COLLATERAL AGENT
Reel/Frame 068657/0666 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Aug 15, 2024
From: MUSARUBRA US LLC
To: MAGENTA SECURITY INTERMEDIATE HOLDINGS LLC
Reel/Frame 068657/0764 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Aug 15, 2024
From: MAGENTA SECURITY INTERMEDIATE HOLDINGS LLC
To: MAGENTA SECURITY HOLDINGS LLC
Reel/Frame 068657/0843 →
SECURITY INTEREST Recorded Aug 1, 2024
From: MUSARUBRA US LLC; SKYHIGH SECURITY LLC
To: STG PARTNERS, LLC
Reel/Frame 068324/0731 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Jul 1, 2022
From: MCAFEE, LLC
To: MUSARUBRA US LLC
Reel/Frame 060561/0466 →
CORRECTIVE ASSIGNMENT TO CORRECT THE PROPERTY NUMBERS PREVIOUSLY RECORDED AT REEL: 057315 FRAME: 0001. ASSIGNOR(S) HEREBY CONFIRMS THE ASSIGNMENT. Recorded Apr 11, 2022
From: MCAFEE, LLC
To: MUSARUBRA US LLC
Reel/Frame 060878/0126 →
SECOND LIEN PATENT SECURITY AGREEMENT Recorded Jul 27, 2021
From: MUSARUBRA US LLC; SKYHIGH NETWORKS, LLC
To: UBS AG, STAMFORD BRANCH, AS COLLATERAL AGENT
Reel/Frame 056990/0960 →
FIRST LIEN PATENT SECURITY AGREEMENT Recorded Jul 27, 2021
From: MUSARUBRA US LLC; SKYHIGH NETWORKS, LLC
To: UBS AG, STAMFORD BRANCH, AS COLLATERAL AGENT
Reel/Frame 057453/0053 →
CORRECTIVE ASSIGNMENT TO CORRECT THE ASSIGNEE PREVIOUSLY RECORDED ON REEL 050637 FRAME 0954. ASSIGNOR(S) HEREBY CONFIRMS THE THIS SUBMISSION IS TO CORRECT THE ASSIGNEE NAME FROM "MCAFEE, LLC" TO "MCAFEE, INC".. Recorded Sep 22, 2020
From: DAS, SUNDEEP; POORNACHANDRAN, RAJESH; SMITH, NED M; ZIMMER, VINCENT J.; SHARMA, PRAMOD; ZEIGLER, ARTHUR; VASHISTH, SUMANT; HUNT, SIMON
To: MCAFEE, INC.
Reel/Frame 053849/0693 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Oct 4, 2019
From: DAS, SUNDEEP; POORNACHANDRAN, RAJESH; SMITH, NED M; ZIMMER, VINCENT J.; SHARMA, PRAMOD; ZEIGLER, ARTHUR; VASHISTH, SUMANT; HUNT, SIMON
To: MCAFEE, LLC
Reel/Frame 050637/0954 →
CHANGE OF NAME Recorded Oct 4, 2019
From: MCAFEE, INC.
To: MCAFEE, LLC
Reel/Frame 050637/0969 →