Systems and methods for protecting users
The disclosed computer-implemented method for protecting users may include (i) displaying, through a graphical user interface for a third-party security application executing within an operating system environment, a button for a user to select, (ii) displaying, through the graphical user interface, a prompt that prompts the user to select the button in order to receive a reward, (iii) configuring the graphical user interface such that selecting the button triggers both a conspicuous response that provides access to the reward and a more hidden response that initiates application of a security service to protect the user, and (iv) performing, based on receiving a selection of the button, both the conspicuous response and the more hidden response. Various other methods, systems, and computer-readable media are also disclosed.
1. A computer-implemented method for protecting users, at least a portion of the method being performed by a computing device comprising at least one processor, the method comprising:
displaying, through a graphical user interface for a third-party security application executing within an operating system environment, a button for a user to select;
displaying, through the graphical user interface, a prompt that prompts the user to select the button in order to receive a reward;
configuring the graphical user interface such that selecting the button triggers both a conspicuous response that provides access to the reward and a more hidden response that initiates application of a security service to protect the user; and
performing, based on receiving a selection of the button, both the conspicuous response and the more hidden response; wherein:
the operating system environment comprises a mobile operating system environment that places a limit on an ability of the third-party security application to autonomously perform the more hidden response without user intervention; and
the graphical user interface displaying the button prompts the user to provide the user intervention such that the limit on the ability of the third-party security application to autonomously perform the more hidden response is circumvented.
2. The computer-implemented method of claim 1 , wherein the more hidden response initiates a virtual private network connection.
3. The computer-implemented method of claim 1 , wherein the more hidden response initiates a proxy security server connection that intercepts network traffic and applies a security policy to the intercepted network traffic.
4. The computer-implemented method of claim 1 , wherein the more hidden response initiates a parental control service.
5. The computer-implemented method of claim 1 , wherein the graphical user interface omits displaying to the user any information regarding the more hidden response.
6. The computer-implemented method of claim 1 ,
wherein performance of the more hidden response is entirely hidden, as a background process, from the user.
7. The computer-implemented method of claim 1 , wherein:
the more hidden response involves more technical sophistication than the conspicuous response; and
the graphical user interface displaying the button prompts the user to trigger the third-party security application to complete a process of the more hidden response despite the user lacking technical sophistication.
8. The computer-implemented method of claim 1 , wherein the user comprises a protected child in a guardian-child relationship with a guardian who administers a parental control system in connection with the third-party security application.
9. The computer-implemented method of claim 8 , wherein the conspicuous response provides the protected child with access to the reward that the protected child has earned through performing a security-based instructional exercise within the parental control system.
10. The computer-implemented method of claim 9 , wherein the reward comprises at least one of a monetary reward or an amount of network connectivity.
11. A system for protecting users, the system comprising:
a display module, stored in memory, that:
displays, through a graphical user interface for a third-party security application executing within an operating system environment, a button for a user to select;
displays, through the graphical user interface, a prompt that prompts the user to select the button in order to receive a reward;
a configuration module, stored in memory, that configures the graphical user interface such that selecting the button triggers both a conspicuous response that provides access to the reward and a more hidden response that initiates application of a security service to protect the user;
a performance module, stored in memory, that performs, based on receiving a selection of the button, both the conspicuous response and the more hidden response; and
at least one physical processor configured to execute the display module, the configuration module, and the performance module; wherein:
the operating system environment comprises a mobile operating system environment that places a limit on an ability of the third-party security application to autonomously perform the more hidden response without user intervention; and
the graphical user interface displaying the button prompts the user to provide the user intervention such that the limit on the ability of the third-party security application to autonomously perform the more hidden response is circumvented.
12. The system of claim 11 , wherein the more hidden response initiates a virtual private network connection.
13. The system of claim 11 , wherein the more hidden response initiates a proxy security server connection that intercepts network traffic and applies a security policy to the intercepted network traffic.
14. The system of claim 11 , wherein the more hidden response initiates a parental control service.
15. The system of claim 11 , wherein the graphical user interface is configured to omit displaying to the user any information regarding the more hidden response.
16. The system of claim 11 ,
wherein performance of the more hidden response is entirely hidden, as a background process, from the user.
17. The system of claim 11 , wherein:
the more hidden response involves more technical sophistication than the conspicuous response; and
the graphical user interface displaying the button prompts the user to trigger the third-party security application to complete a process of the more hidden response despite the user lacking technical sophistication.
18. The system of claim 11 , wherein the user comprises a protected child in a guardian-child relationship with a guardian who administers a parental control system in connection with the third-party security application.
19. The system of claim 18 , wherein the conspicuous response provides the protected child with access to the reward that the protected child has earned through performing a security-based instructional exercise within the parental control system.
20. A non-transitory computer-readable medium encoded with computer-executable instructions that, when executed by a physical processor of a computing device, cause the computing device to perform a method comprising:
displaying, through a graphical user interface for a third-party security application executing within an operating system environment, a button for a user to select;
displaying, through the graphical user interface, a prompt that prompts the user to select the button in order to receive a reward;
configuring the graphical user interface such that selecting the button triggers both a conspicuous response that provides access to the reward and a more hidden response that initiates application of a security service to protect the user; and
performing, based on receiving a selection of the button, both the conspicuous response and the more hidden response; wherein:
the operating system environment comprises a mobile operating system environment that places a limit on an ability of the third-party security application to autonomously perform the more hidden response without user intervention; and
the graphical user interface displaying the button prompts the user to provide the user intervention such that the limit on the ability of the third-party security application to autonomously perform the more hidden response is circumvented.