IP Library Granted Patent US 10,965,989
Granted Patent B2
US 10,965,989 · App. 16/566,354 · Granted Mar 30, 2021

Methods and apparatus to model on/off states of media presentation devices based on return path data

Inventors: Jonathan Sullivan (Hurricane, UT); Katya Sotiris (Columbia, MD); Neung Soo Ha (Bethesda, MD); Balachander Shankar (Tampa, FL)
Assignee: THE NIELSEN COMPANY (US), LLC
H04N21/4667G06Q30/0204H04H60/31H04H60/32H04N21/2407H04N21/252H04N21/25866H04N21/25891H04N21/44222H04N21/6582H04H60/66
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 10,965,989
App. No.
16/566,354
Granted
Mar 30, 2021
Kind
B2
Abstract

Methods and apparatus to model on/off states of media presentation devices based on return path data are disclosed. An apparatus includes a distribution generator to: generate a first cumulative probability distribution indicative of actual durations of panel tuning segments; and generate a second cumulative probability distribution indicative of modeled durations of modeled tuning segments, the modeled tuning segments corresponding to modified lengths of the panel tuning segments. The apparatus also includes an RPD tuning information analyzer to analyze RPD tuning information reported from an RPD device. The apparatus further includes a set-on time calculator to estimate a set-on time for a media set associated with the RPD device, the set-on time indicative of a period of time when the media set is powered on, the set-on time estimated based on the RPD tuning information and the first and second cumulative probability distributions.

Claims (55)

1. An apparatus comprising:

a distribution generator to:

generate a first cumulative probability distribution indicative of actual durations of panel tuning segments, the panel tuning segments corresponding to time periods during which panelists were exposed to first media;

generate a second cumulative probability distribution indicative of modelled durations of modelled tuning segments, the modelled tuning segments corresponding to modified lengths of the panel tuning segments;

an RPD tuning information analyzer to analyze RPD tuning information reported from an RPD device, the RPD tuning information indicative of a reported RPD tuning segment during which the RPD device was accessing second media; and

a set-on time calculator to estimate a set-on time for a media set associated with the RPD device, the set-on time indicative of a period of time when the media set is powered on, the set-on time estimated based on the RPD tuning information and the first and second cumulative probability distributions.

2. The apparatus of claim 1 , further including a correlation calculator to calculate a correlation coefficient between the actual durations of the panel tuning segments and the modelled durations of the modelled tuning segments.

3. The apparatus of claim 1 , further including an RPD model generator to define the modelled durations of the modelled tuning segments based on modifications to the actual durations of the panel tuning segments.

4. The apparatus of claim 3 , wherein the RPD model generator is to define the modelled durations of the modelled tuning segments by:

extending the actual durations of the panel tuning segments, to define extended durations, by the shorter of (1) a substantial extension period and (2) a gap in time between ones of the panel tuning segments and corresponding subsequent ones of the panel tuning segments; and

reducing the extended durations associated with a subset of the panel tuning segments based on a standby timer length associated with the RPD device.

5. The apparatus of claim 4 , wherein the subset is a first subset, the RPD model generator to reduce the extended durations associated with a second subset of the panel tuning segments to the actual durations of the corresponding panel tuning segments of the second subset.

6. The apparatus of claim 5 , wherein at least one of the panel tuning segments is associated with both the first subset and the second subset.

7. The apparatus of claim 1 , wherein the RPD tuning information analyzer is to:

determine a probability percentage on the second cumulative probability distribution corresponding to a reported duration of the reported RPD tuning segment: and

determine a deterministic-estimated duration based on where the probability percentage falls on the first cumulative probability distribution, the set-on time calculator to estimate the set-on time based on the deterministic-estimated duration.

8. The apparatus of claim 1 , wherein the RPD tuning information analyzer is to determine a probabilistic-estimated duration based on where a randomly generated number falls on the first cumulative probability distribution, the set-on time calculator to estimate the set-on time based on the probabilistic-estimated duration.

9. A non-transitory computer readable medium comprising instructions that, when executed, cause a machine to at least:

generate a first cumulative probability distribution indicative of actual durations of panel tuning segments, the panel tuning segments corresponding to time periods during which panelists were exposed to first media;

generate a second cumulative probability distribution indicative of modelled durations of modelled tuning segments, the modelled tuning segments corresponding to modified lengths of the panel tuning segments;

analyze RPD tuning information reported from an RPD device, the RPD tuning information indicative of a reported RPD tuning segment during which the RPD device was accessing second media; and

estimate a set-on time for a media set associated with the RPD device, the set-on time indicative of a period of time when the media set is powered on, the set-on time estimated based on the RPD tuning information and the first and second cumulative probability distributions.

10. The non-transitory computer readable medium of claim 9 , wherein the instructions further cause the machine to define the modelled durations of the modelled tuning segments based on modifications to the actual durations of the panel tuning segments.

11. The non-transitory computer readable medium of claim 10 , wherein the instructions further cause the machine to:

extend the actual durations of the panel tuning segments, to define extended durations, by the shorter of (1) a substantial extension period and (2) a gap in time between ones of the panel tuning segments and corresponding subsequent ones of the panel tuning segments; and

reduce the extended durations associated with a subset of the panel tuning segments based on a standby timer length associated with the RPD device.

12. The non-transitory computer readable medium of claim 11 , wherein the subset is a first subset, and the instructions further cause the machine to reduce the extended durations associated with a second subset of the panel tuning segments to the actual durations of the corresponding panel tuning segments of the second subset.

13. The non-transitory computer readable medium of claim 12 , wherein at least one of the panel tuning segments is associated with both the first subset and the second subset.

14. The non-transitory computer readable medium of claim 9 , wherein the instructions further cause the machine to:

determine a probability percentage on the second cumulative probability distribution corresponding to a reported duration of the reported RPD tuning segment: and

determine a deterministic-estimated duration based on where the probability percentage falls on the first cumulative probability distribution; and

estimate the set-on time based on the deterministic-estimated duration.

15. The non-transitory computer readable medium of claim 9 , wherein the instructions further cause the machine to:

determine a probabilistic-estimated duration based on where a randomly generated number falls on the first cumulative probability distribution; and

estimate the set-on time based on the probabilistic-estimated duration.

16. The non-transitory computer readable medium of claim 9 , wherein the instructions further cause the machine to calculate a correlation coefficient between the actual durations of the panel tuning segments and the modelled durations of the modelled tuning segments.

17. A method comprising:

generating, by executing an instruction with a processor, a first cumulative probability distribution indicative of actual durations of panel tuning segments, the panel tuning segments corresponding to time periods during which panelists were exposed to first media;

generating, by executing an instruction with the processor, a second cumulative probability distribution indicative of modelled durations of modelled tuning segments, the modelled tuning segments corresponding to modified lengths of the panel tuning segments;

analyzing, by executing an instruction with the processor, RPD tuning information reported from an RPD device, the RPD tuning information indicative of a reported RPD tuning segment during which the RPD device was accessing second media; and

estimating, by executing an instruction with the processor, a set-on time for a media set associated with the RPD device, the set-on time indicative of a period of time when the media set is powered on, the set-on time estimated based on the RPD tuning information and the first and second cumulative probability distributions.

18. The method of claim 17 , further including defining the modelled durations of the modelled tuning segments based on modifications to the actual durations of the panel tuning segments.

19. The method of claim 18 , further including:

extending the actual durations of the panel tuning segments, to define extended durations, by the shorter of (1) a substantial extension period and (2) a gap in time between ones of the panel tuning segments and corresponding subsequent ones of the panel tuning segments; and

reducing the extended durations associated with a subset of the panel tuning segments based on a standby timer length associated with the RPD device.

20. The method of claim 19 , wherein the subset is a first subset, and the method further includes reducing the extended durations associated with a second subset of the panel tuning segments to the actual durations of the corresponding panel tuning segments of the second subset.

21. The method of claim 20 , wherein at least one of the panel tuning segments is associated with both the first subset and the second subset.

22. The method of claim 17 , further including:

determining a probability percentage on the second cumulative probability distribution corresponding to a reported duration of the reported RPD tuning segment: and

determining a deterministic-estimated duration based on where the probability percentage falls on the first cumulative probability distribution; and

estimating the set-on time based on the deterministic-estimated duration.

23. The method of claim 17 , further including:

determining a probabilistic-estimated duration based on where a randomly generated number falls on the first cumulative probability distribution; and

estimating the set-on time based on the probabilistic-estimated duration.

24. The method of claim 17 , further including calculating a correlation coefficient between the actual durations of the panel tuning segments and the modelled durations of the modelled tuning segments.

Assignments (8)
RELEASE (REEL 054066 / FRAME 0064) Recorded May 11, 2023
From: CITIBANK, N.A.
To: A. C. NIELSEN COMPANY, LLC; EXELATE, INC.; GRACENOTE, INC.; GRACENOTE MEDIA SERVICES, LLC; THE NIELSEN COMPANY (US), LLC; NETRATINGS, LLC
Reel/Frame 063605/0001 →
RELEASE (REEL 053473 / FRAME 0001) Recorded May 11, 2023
From: CITIBANK, N.A.
To: A. C. NIELSEN COMPANY, LLC; EXELATE, INC.; GRACENOTE, INC.; GRACENOTE MEDIA SERVICES, LLC; THE NIELSEN COMPANY (US), LLC; NETRATINGS, LLC
Reel/Frame 063603/0001 →
SECURITY INTEREST Recorded May 8, 2023
From: GRACENOTE DIGITAL VENTURES, LLC; GRACENOTE MEDIA SERVICES, LLC; GRACENOTE, INC.; TNC (US) HOLDINGS, INC.; THE NIELSEN COMPANY (US), LLC
To: ARES CAPITAL CORPORATION
Reel/Frame 063574/0632 →
SECURITY INTEREST Recorded Apr 28, 2023
From: GRACENOTE DIGITAL VENTURES, LLC; GRACENOTE MEDIA SERVICES, LLC; GRACENOTE, INC.; TNC (US) HOLDINGS, INC.; THE NIELSEN COMPANY (US), LLC
To: CITIBANK, N.A.
Reel/Frame 063561/0381 →
SECURITY AGREEMENT Recorded Jan 31, 2023
From: GRACENOTE DIGITAL VENTURES, LLC; GRACENOTE MEDIA SERVICES, LLC; GRACENOTE, INC.; TNC (US) HOLDINGS, INC.; THE NIELSEN COMPANY (US), LLC
To: BANK OF AMERICA, N.A.
Reel/Frame 063560/0547 →
CORRECTIVE ASSIGNMENT TO CORRECT THE PATENTS LISTED ON SCHEDULE 1 RECORDED ON 6-9-2020 PREVIOUSLY RECORDED ON REEL 053473 FRAME 0001. ASSIGNOR(S) HEREBY CONFIRMS THE SUPPLEMENTAL IP SECURITY AGREEMENT. Recorded Oct 7, 2020
From: A.C. NIELSEN (ARGENTINA) S.A.; A.C. NIELSEN COMPANY, LLC; ACN HOLDINGS INC.; ACNIELSEN CORPORATION; ACNIELSEN ERATINGS.COM; AFFINNOVA, INC.; ART HOLDING, L.L.C.; ATHENIAN LEASING CORPORATION; CZT/ACN TRADEMARKS, L.L.C.; EXELATE, INC.; GRACENOTE, INC.; GRACENOTE DIGITAL VENTURES, LLC; GRACENOTE MEDIA SERVICES, LLC; NETRATINGS, LLC; NIELSEN AUDIO, INC.; NIELSEN CONSUMER INSIGHTS, INC.; NIELSEN CONSUMER NEUROSCIENCE, INC.; NIELSEN FINANCE CO.; NIELSEN FINANCE LLC; NIELSEN INTERNATIONAL HOLDINGS, INC.; NIELSEN MOBILE, LLC; NMR INVESTING I, INC.; TCG DIVESTITURE INC.; TNC (US) HOLDINGS, INC.; THE NIELSEN COMPANY (US), LLC; VIZU CORPORATION; VNU MARKETING INFORMATION, INC.; NMR LICENSING ASSOCIATES, L.P.; NIELSEN HOLDING AND FINANCE B.V.; THE NIELSEN COMPANY B.V.; VNU INTERNATIONAL B.V.
To: CITIBANK, N.A
Reel/Frame 054066/0064 →
SUPPLEMENTAL SECURITY AGREEMENT Recorded Jun 9, 2020
From: A. C. NIELSEN COMPANY, LLC; ACN HOLDINGS INC.; ACNIELSEN CORPORATION; ACNIELSEN ERATINGS.COM; AFFINNOVA, INC.; ART HOLDING, L.L.C.; ATHENIAN LEASING CORPORATION; CZT/ACN TRADEMARKS, L.L.C.; EXELATE, INC.; GRACENOTE, INC.; GRACENOTE DIGITAL VENTURES, LLC; GRACENOTE MEDIA SERVICES, LLC; NETRATINGS, LLC; NIELSEN AUDIO, INC.; NIELSEN CONSUMER INSIGHTS, INC.; NIELSEN CONSUMER NEUROSCIENCE, INC.; NIELSEN FINANCE CO.; NIELSEN FINANCE LLC; NIELSEN INTERNATIONAL HOLDINGS, INC.; NIELSEN MOBILE, LLC; NIELSEN UK FINANCE I, LLC; NMR INVESTING I, INC.; TCG DIVESTITURE INC.; TNC (US) HOLDINGS, INC.; THE NIELSEN COMPANY (US), LLC; VIZU CORPORATION; VNU MARKETING INFORMATION, INC.; NMR LICENSING ASSOCIATES, L.P.; NIELSEN HOLDING AND FINANCE B.V.; THE NIELSEN COMPANY B.V.; VNU INTERNATIONAL B.V.
To: CITIBANK, N.A.
Reel/Frame 053473/0001 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Jan 24, 2020
From: SULLIVAN, JONATHAN; SOTIRIS, KATYA; HA, NEUNG SOO; SHANKAR, BALACHANDER
To: THE NIELSEN COMPANY (US), LLC.
Reel/Frame 051614/0367 →
Continuity (3)
Continuation 15639164 · Jun 30, 2017
Provisional Application 62428487 · Nov 30, 2016
Related Publication 20200007935A1 · Jan 2, 2020