IP Library Granted Patent US 11,699,504
Granted Patent B2
US 11,699,504 · App. 16/575,276 · Granted Jul 11, 2023

Hash-based efficient comparison of sequencing results

Inventors: Geert Trooskens (Ghent, BE); Wim Maria R. Van Criekinge (Waarloos, BE)
Assignee: SHARECARE AI, INC.
G16B30/00C12Q1/6827C12Q1/6869G06F16/2255G06F17/18G16B5/00G16B10/00G16B20/20G16B20/40G16B40/00G16B40/10G16B45/00G16B50/00
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 11,699,504
App. No.
16/575,276
Granted
Jul 11, 2023
Kind
B2
Abstract

The technology disclosed generates a reference array of variant data for locations that are shared between read results which are to be compared, and generates hashes over a selected pattern length of positions in the reference array to independently produce non-unique window hashes for base patterns in the read results. It then selects for comparison window hashes that occur less than a ceiling number of times and compares the selected window hashes to identify common window hashes between the read results. It then determines a similarity measure for the read results based on the common window hashes.

Claims (93)

1. A computer-implemented method of efficiently comparing read results, the method including:

generating a reference array of variant data for locations shared between read results to be compared;

generating hashes over a selected pattern length of positions in the reference array to independently produce non-unique window hashes for base patterns in the read results;

selecting for comparison window hashes that occur less than a ceiling number of times;

comparing the selected window hashes to identify common window hashes between the read results; and

determining a similarity measure for the read results based on the common window hashes.

2. The computer-implemented method of claim 1 , wherein the variant data is identified by one selected from sixteen phased pairings and ten unphased pairings.

3. The computer-implemented method of claim 1 , wherein the selected pattern length of positions ranges from fifteen to forty bases.

4. The computer-implemented method of claim 1 , wherein length of the reference array ranges from one hundred thousand to one million base positions.

5. The computer-implemented method of claim 4 , wherein the reference array is ordered by carriers and by carrier positions.

6. The computer-implemented method of claim 4 , wherein the pattern length of positions is selected based on the length of the reference array.

7. The computer-implemented method of claim 1 , wherein the ceiling number of times ranges from one to ten.

8. The computer-implemented method of claim 1 , wherein the similarity measure is determined by a distance formula defined as

1

-

number

of

common

window

hashes

number

of

unique

window

hashes

.

9. The computer-implemented method of claim 1 , further including:

partitioning the read results into bins;

comparing the selected window hashes between the read results on a bin-by-bin basis such that selected window hashes for base patterns occurring in corresponding bins in the read results are compared;

based on the comparing, identifying common window hashes between the corresponding bins; and

determining a similarity measure for the corresponding bins based on the common window hashes.

10. The computer-implemented method of claim 9 , further including:

requiring that the selected window hashes between the corresponding bins completely match.

11. The computer-implemented method of claim 9 , further including:

based on bin-wise similarity measures, determining a percentage of shared bases between the read results, wherein the percentage of shared bases are determined on a carrier-by-carrier basis; and

determining inherited traits based on the percentage of shared bases as determined from the bin-wise similarity measures.

12. The computer-implemented method of claim 9 , further including:

based on bin-wise similarity measures, determining a percentage of shared bases between the read results, wherein the percentage of shared bases are determined on a carrier-by-carrier basis; and

identifying common ancestors and close and distant relatives based on the percentage of shared bases as determined from the bin-wise similarity measures.

13. The computer-implemented method of claim 9 , further including:

based on the bin-wise similarity measures, determining a percentage of shared bases between a given individual's read results and ethnicity-specific read results;

identifying ethnic ancestry of the given individual based on the percentage of shared bases; and

for the bin-wise similarity measures, requiring that the selected window hashes between the corresponding bins substantially match.

14. The computer-implemented method of claim 9 , wherein the bins are defined for the read results on a carrier-by-carrier basis.

15. The computer-implemented method of claim 9 , wherein each bin contains five hundred to thousand variants.

16. The computer-implemented method of claim 9 , wherein each bin spans across one hundred thousand to one million bases.

17. The computer-implemented method of claim 9 , wherein each bin spans across multiple units.

18. The computer-implemented method of claim 9 , further including:

based on the bin-wise similarity measures, generating a distance tree visualization between the read results.

19. The computer-implemented method of claim 1 , wherein the variant data contains those variants that have highest observed frequency.

20. The computer-implemented method of claim 1 , further including:

comparing the selected window hashes between the read results on a starting position basis such that selected window hashes for base patterns having same start positions in the read results are compared;

identifying common window hashes between the read results based on the comparing; and

determining a similarity measure between the read results based on the common window hashes.

21. The computer-implemented method of claim 20 , further including:

based on starting position-wise similarity measures, determining a percentage of shared bases between the read results, wherein the percentage of shared bases are determined on a carrier-by-carrier basis; and

determining inherited traits based on the percentage of shared bases as determined from the starting position-wise similarity measures.

22. The computer-implemented method of claim 20 , further including:

based on starting position-wise similarity measures, determining a percentage of shared bases between the read results, wherein the percentage of shared bases are determined on a carrier-by-carrier basis; and

identifying common ancestors and close and distant relatives based on the percentage of shared bases as determined from the starting position-wise similarity measures.

23. The computer-implemented method of claim 20 , further including:

based on the starting position-wise similarity measures, determining a percentage of shared bases between a given individual's read results and ethnicity-specific read results; and

identifying ethnic ancestry of the given individual based on the percentage of shared bases.

24. The computer-implemented method of claim 20 , further including:

based on the starting position-wise similarity measures, generating a distance tree visualization between the read results.

25. A non-transitory computer readable storage medium impressed with computer program instructions to efficiently compare read results, the instructions, when executed on a processor, implement a method of claim 1 :

generating a reference array of variant data for locations shared between read results to be compared;

generating hashes over a selected pattern length of positions in the reference array to independently produce non-unique window hashes for base patterns in the read results;

selecting for comparison window hashes that occur less than a ceiling number of times;

comparing the selected window hashes to identify common window hashes between the read results; and

determining a similarity measure for the read results based on the common window hashes.

26. A system including one or more processors coupled to memory, the memory loaded with computer instructions to efficiently compare read results, the instructions, when executed on the processors, implement actions comprising:

generating a reference array of variant data for locations shared between read results to be compared;

generating hashes over a selected pattern length of positions in the reference array to independently produce non-unique window hashes for base patterns in the read results;

selecting for comparison window hashes that occur less than a ceiling number of times;

comparing the selected window hashes to identify common window hashes between the read results; and

determining a similarity measure for the read results based on the common window hashes.

27. A computer-implemented method of efficiently comparing sequenced files, the method including:

accessing a first sequenced file and a second sequenced file, wherein the first and second sequenced files contain variants occurring at different carriers and at different carrier positions;

generating a reference array for those carrier positions that are shared between the first and second sequenced files;

based on the reference array, generating a first sequence from the first sequenced file and a second sequence from the second sequenced file;

generating hashes over a selected pattern length of positions in the reference array to independently produce non-unique window hashes for base patterns in the first and second sequences;

selecting for comparison window hashes that occur less than a ceiling number of times;

comparing the selected window hashes to identify common window hashes between the first and second sequences; and

determining a similarity measure between the first and second sequences based on the common window hashes.

Assignments (3)
SECURITY INTEREST Recorded Oct 22, 2024
From: HEALTHWAYS SC, LLC; SHARECARE AI, INC.
To: WELLS FARGO BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION
Reel/Frame 068977/0210 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Aug 11, 2022
From: DOC.AI, INC.
To: SHARECARE AI, INC.
Reel/Frame 060789/0846 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Sep 17, 2021
From: TROOSKENS, GEERT; VAN CRIEKINGE, WIM MARIA R.
To: DOC.AI, INC.
Reel/Frame 057520/0689 →
Continuity (4)
Provisional Application 62734840 · Sep 21, 2018
Provisional Application 62734872 · Sep 21, 2018
Provisional Application 62734895 · Sep 21, 2018
Related Publication 20200098446A1 · Mar 26, 2020