IP Library Granted Patent US 11,256,540
Granted Patent B2
US 11,256,540 · App. 16/590,852 · Granted Feb 22, 2022

Server-to-container migration

Inventors: Rajashekar Dasari (Bangalore, IN); Harish Kum Somisetty (Bangalore, IN); Stefan Bergstein (Boeblingen, DE)
Assignee: MICRO FOCUS LLC
G06F9/4856G06F3/067G06F3/0617G06F3/0647G06F9/4881G06F9/5088G06F2209/504G06F2209/5022
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 11,256,540
App. No.
16/590,852
Granted
Feb 22, 2022
Kind
B2
Abstract

For each server under consideration for container migration, whether the server has a value for a first parameter that precludes the server from being migrated to a container is determined. Each server having a value that precludes the serve from being migrated to a container is removed from further consideration. For each server remaining under consideration, a value of the server for each second parameter of a number of second parameters is determined, and the values of the server for the second parameters are weighted to yield a weight for the server. The servers remaining under consideration for migration are ranked based at least on the weights for the servers, yielding an order in which the servers are to migrated.

Claims (49)

1. A non-transitory computer-readable data storage medium storing program code executable by a processor to perform processing comprising:

for each server of a plurality of servers under consideration for migration to containers, determining whether the server has a value for a first parameter that precludes the server from being migrated to a container;

removing from further consideration for migration to the containers each server having the value that precludes the server from being migrated;

for each server remaining under consideration for migration, determining a value of the server for each second parameter of a plurality of second parameters including server utilization, and weighting the values of the server for the second parameters to yield a weight for the server, including, determining that the server utilization is between a lower limit and an upper limit of a specified utilization range for a type of the server, and responsively increasing the weight as a function of how close the utilization of the server is to a midpoint between the lower limit and the upper limit;

ranking the servers remaining under consideration for migration based at least on the weights for the servers, yielding an order in which the servers are to migrated; and

migrating a highest ranked server within the order to the container.

2. The non-transitory computer-readable data storage medium of claim 1 , wherein the first parameter comprises a processor architecture of the server.

3. The non-transitory computer-readable data storage medium of claim 2 , wherein determining whether the server has a value for the first parameter that precludes the server from being migrated comprises:

determining whether the server resides on a non-x86 processor architecture, the server unable to be migrated if the server resides on the non-x86 processor architecture.

4. The non-transitory computer-readable data storage medium of claim 1 , wherein the first parameter comprises application software hosted by the server.

5. The non-transitory computer-readable data storage medium of claim 4 , wherein determining whether the server has a value for the first parameter that precludes the server from being migrated comprises:

determining whether the server hosts any application software that is unsupported by a platform of the container, the server unable to be migrated if the server hosts any application software that is unsupported by the platform.

6. The non-transitory computer-readable data storage medium of claim 1 , wherein the server utilization comprises a processor utilization rate of the server.

7. The non-transitory computer-readable data storage medium of claim 1 , wherein the server utilization comprises a memory utilization rate of the server.

8. The non-transitory computer-readable data storage medium of claim 1 , wherein the second parameters comprise server shared storage device access, and wherein weighting the values of the server for the second parameters further includes:

increasing the weight for the server if the server does not have access to a shared storage device.

9. The non-transitory computer-readable data storage medium of claim 1 , wherein the second parameters comprise server networking requirements, and wherein weighting the values of the server for the second parameters further includes:

increasing the weight for the server if the server is not part of a private network and the server does not require a dual stack networking address.

10. The non-transitory computer-readable data storage medium of claim 1 , wherein the second parameters comprise server-hosted application software, and wherein weighting the values of the server for the second parameters further includes:

increasing the weight for the server if the server does not host any application software.

11. The non-transitory computer-readable data storage medium of claim 1 , wherein the second parameters comprise hardware-based application licensing, and wherein weighting the values of the server for the second parameters further includes:

increasing the weight for the server if the server does not host any application that has hardware-based application licensing.

12. The non-transitory computer-readable data storage medium of claim 1 , wherein the second parameters comprise application statefulness, and wherein weighting the values of the server for the second parameters further includes:

increasing the weight for the server if the server does not host any application that is stateful.

13. The non-transitory computer-readable data storage medium of claim 1 , wherein the second parameters comprise kernel requirements, and wherein weighting the values of the server for the second parameters further includes:

increasing the weight for the server if the server does not host any application that has to run in privileged mode.

14. The non-transitory computer-readable data storage medium of claim 1 , wherein the second parameters comprise application clustering, and wherein weighting the values of the server for the second parameters further includes:

increasing the weight for the server if the server does not host any application that is part of a cluster.

15. The non-transitory computer-readable data storage medium of claim 1 , wherein each server comprises a physical server or a virtual machine.

16. A method comprising:

for each server of a plurality of servers under consideration for migration to containers, determining, by a computing device, whether the server has a non-x86 processor architecture and determining whether the server hosts any application software unsupported by a container platform;

removing, by the processor, from further consideration for migration to the containers any server that has the non-x86 processor architecture and any server that hosts any application software unsupported by the container platform;

for each server remaining under consideration, determining, by the processor, a value of the server for each parameter of a plurality of parameters including server utilization, and weighting the values of the server for the parameters to yield a weight for the server, including, determining that the server utilization is between a lower limit and an upper limit of a specified utilization range for a type of the server, and responsively increasing the weight as a function of how close the utilization of the server is to a midpoint between the lower limit and the upper limit;

ranking, by the processor, the servers remaining under consideration for migration based at least on the weights for the servers; and

migrating, by the processor, a highest-ranked server to a container.

17. The method of claim 16 , wherein the parameters comprise server networking requirements, and wherein weighting the values of the server for the parameters comprises:

increasing the weight for the server if the server is not part of a private network and the server does not require a dual stack networking address.

18. The method of claim 16 , wherein the parameters comprise server shared storage device access, and wherein weighting the values of the server for the parameters further includes:

increasing the weight for the server if the server does not have access to a shared storage device.

19. The method of claim 16 , wherein the parameters comprise server-hosted application software, and wherein weighting the values of the server for the parameters further includes:

increasing the weight for the server if the server does not host any application software.

20. A system comprising:

a processor; and

a memory storing instructions executable by the processor to:

for each server of a plurality of servers under consideration for migration to containers, determine whether the server has a value for a parameter that precludes the server from being migrated to a container;

remove from further consideration for migration to the containers each server having the value that precludes the server from being migrated;

for each server remaining under consideration for migration, determine an effective utilization of the server based on how close a utilization of the server is to a midpoint between a lower limit and an upper limit of a specified utilization range for a type of the server; and

rank the servers remaining under consideration for migration based at least on the effective utilizations of the servers; and

migrate a highest-ranked server to a container.

Assignments (6)
RELEASE OF SECURITY INTEREST REEL/FRAME 052294/0522 Recorded Feb 2, 2023
From: JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A.
To: MICRO FOCUS LLC; MICRO FOCUS SOFTWARE INC. (F/K/A NOVELL, INC.); NETIQ CORPORATION
Reel/Frame 062624/0449 →
RELEASE OF SECURITY INTEREST REEL/FRAME 052295/0041 Recorded Feb 2, 2023
From: JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A.
To: MICRO FOCUS LLC; MICRO FOCUS SOFTWARE INC. (F/K/A NOVELL, INC.); NETIQ CORPORATION
Reel/Frame 062625/0754 →
SECURITY AGREEMENT Recorded Apr 2, 2020
From: MICRO FOCUS LLC; BORLAND SOFTWARE CORPORATION; MICRO FOCUS SOFTWARE INC.; NETIQ CORPORATION; MICRO FOCUS (US), INC.
To: JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A.
Reel/Frame 052294/0522 →
SECURITY AGREEMENT Recorded Apr 2, 2020
From: MICRO FOCUS LLC; BORLAND SOFTWARE CORPORATION; MICRO FOCUS SOFTWARE INC.; NETIQ CORPORATION; MICRO FOCUS (US), INC.
To: JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A.
Reel/Frame 052295/0041 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Oct 2, 2019
From: DASARI, RAJASHEKAR; SOMISETTY, HARISH KUMAR; BERGSTEIN, STEFAN
To: ENTIT SOFTWARE LLC
Reel/Frame 050603/0622 →
CHANGE OF NAME Recorded Oct 2, 2019
From: ENTIT SOFTWARE LLC
To: MICRO FOCUS LLC
Reel/Frame 050609/0887 →