IP Library Granted Patent US 11,379,691
Granted Patent B2
US 11,379,691 · App. 16/663,617 · Granted Jul 5, 2022

Burden score for an opaque model

Inventors: Joydeep Ghosh (Austin, TX); Jessica Henderson (Austin, TX); Matthew Sanchez (Austin, TX)
Assignee: Cognitive Scale, Inc.
G06K9/6257G06F16/9535G06K9/6215G06K9/6229G06K9/6234G06K9/6264G06K9/6267G06K9/6276G06K9/6298G06N5/02G06N5/04G06N5/043G06N5/045G06N20/00G06N99/007G06Q10/10G06T19/006G06V10/757H04L67/34
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 11,379,691
App. No.
16/663,617
Granted
Jul 5, 2022
Kind
B2
Abstract

A method, system and computer-readable storage medium for performing a cognitive information processing operation. The cognitive information processing operation includes: receiving data from a plurality of data sources; processing the data from the plurality of data sources to provide cognitively processed insights via an augmented intelligence system, the augmented intelligence system executing on a hardware processor of an information processing system, the augmented intelligence system and the information processing system providing a cognitive computing function; performing an impartiality assessment operation via an impartiality assessment engine, the impartiality assessment operation detecting a presence of bias in an outcome of the cognitive computing function, the impartiality assessment operation generating a burden score representing the presence of bias in the outcome; and, providing the cognitively processed insights to a destination, the destination comprising a cognitive application, the cognitive application enabling a user to interact with the cognitive insights.

Claims (54)

1. A computer-implementable method for cognitive information processing, comprising:

receiving data from a plurality of data sources;

processing the data from the plurality of data sources to provide cognitively processed insights via an augmented intelligence system, the augmented intelligence system executing on a hardware processor of an information processing system, the augmented intelligence system and the information processing system providing a cognitive computing function;

performing an impartiality assessment operation via an impartiality assessment engine, the impartiality assessment operation detecting a presence of bias in an outcome of the cognitive computing function, the impartiality assessment operation generating a burden score representing the presence of bias in the outcome; and,

providing the cognitively processed insights to a destination, the destination comprising a cognitive application, the cognitive application enabling a user to interact with the cognitive insights.

2. The method of claim 1 , wherein:

the impartiality assessment engine is implemented within the augmented intelligence system, the augmented intelligence system comprising a cognitive process foundation.

3. The method of claim 2 , wherein:

the cognitive process foundation performs an augmented intelligence assurance operation using the burden score.

4. The method of claim 1 , wherein:

the impartiality assessment operation includes assessing an effect of the presence of bias on the outcome of the cognitive computing function.

5. The method of claim 4 , wherein:

the impartiality assessment engine receives a counterfactual; and,

the impartiality assessment operation contrasts features between an input subject data point and the counterfactual and identifies contrasts between the input data point and the counterfactual.

6. The method of claim 1 , wherein:

the cognitive computing function is performed using an opaque model; and,

the burden score represents a bias of the opaque model for a particular group of individuals.

7. A system comprising:

a hardware processor;

a data bus coupled to the hardware processor; and

a non-transitory, computer-readable storage medium embodying computer program code, the non-transitory, computer-readable storage medium being coupled to the data bus, the computer program code interacting with a plurality of computer operations and comprising instructions executable by the hardware processor and configured for:

receiving data from a plurality of data sources;

processing the data from the plurality of data sources to provide cognitively processed insights via an augmented intelligence system, the augmented intelligence system executing on a hardware processor of an information processing system, the augmented intelligence system and the information processing system providing a cognitive computing function;

performing an impartiality assessment operation via an impartiality assessment engine, the impartiality assessment operation detecting a presence of bias in an outcome of the cognitive computing function, the impartiality assessment operation generating a burden score representing the presence of bias in the outcome; and,

providing the cognitively processed insights to a destination, the destination comprising a cognitive application, the cognitive application enabling a user to interact with the cognitive insights.

8. The system of claim 7 , wherein:

the impartiality assessment engine is implemented within the augmented intelligence system, the augmented intelligence system comprising a cognitive process foundation.

9. The system of claim 8 , wherein:

the impartiality assessment engine is implemented within the augmented intelligence system, the augmented intelligence system comprising a cognitive process foundation.

10. The system of claim 7 , wherein:

the impartiality assessment operation includes assessing an effect of the presence of bias on the outcome of the cognitive computing function.

11. The system of claim 10 , wherein:

the impartiality assessment engine receives a counterfactual; and,

the impartiality assessment operation contrasts features between an input subject data point and the counterfactual and identifies contrasts between the input data point and the counterfactual.

12. The system of claim 7 , wherein:

the cognitive computing function is performed using an opaque model; and,

the burden score represents a bias of the opaque model for a particular group of individuals.

13. A non-transitory, computer-readable storage medium embodying computer program code, the computer program code comprising computer executable instructions configured for:

receiving data from a plurality of data sources;

processing the data from the plurality of data sources to provide cognitively processed insights via an augmented intelligence system, the augmented intelligence system executing on a hardware processor of an information processing system, the augmented intelligence system and the information processing system providing a cognitive computing function;

performing an impartiality assessment operation via an impartiality assessment engine, the impartiality assessment operation detecting a presence of bias in an outcome of the cognitive computing function, the impartiality assessment operation generating a burden score representing the presence of bias in the outcome; and,

providing the cognitively processed insights to a destination, the destination comprising a cognitive application, the cognitive application enabling a user to interact with the cognitive insights.

14. The non-transitory, computer-readable storage medium of claim 13 , wherein:

the impartiality assessment engine is implemented within the augmented intelligence system, the augmented intelligence system comprising a cognitive process foundation.

15. The non-transitory, computer-readable storage medium of claim 14 , wherein:

the cognitive process foundation performs an augmented intelligence assurance operation using the burden score.

16. The non-transitory, computer-readable storage medium of claim 13 , wherein:

the impartiality assessment operation includes assessing an effect of the presence of bias on the outcome of the cognitive computing function.

17. The non-transitory, computer-readable storage medium of claim 16 , wherein:

the impartiality assessment engine receives a counterfactual; and,

the impartiality assessment operation contrasts features between an input subject data point and the counterfactual and identifies contrasts between the input data point and the counterfactual.

18. The non-transitory, computer-readable storage medium of claim 13 , wherein:

the cognitive computing function is performed using an opaque model; and,

the burden score represents a bias of the opaque model for a particular group of individuals.

Assignments (4)
SECURITY INTEREST Recorded Dec 22, 2022
From: TECNOTREE TECHNOLOGIES INC.
To: TRIPLEPOINT CAPITAL LLC
Reel/Frame 062213/0388 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Dec 14, 2022
From: COGNITIVE SCALE, INC.; COGNITIVESCALE SOFTWARE INDIA PVT. LTD.; COGNITIVE SCALE UK LTD.; COGNITIVE SCALE (CANADA) INC.
To: TECNOTREE TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
Reel/Frame 062125/0051 →
SECURITY INTEREST Recorded Oct 25, 2022
From: COGNITIVE SCALE INC.
To: TRIPLEPOINT CAPITAL LLC
Reel/Frame 061771/0001 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Mar 3, 2020
From: GHOSH, JOYDEEP; HENDERSON, JESSICA; SANCHEZ, MATTHEW
To: COGNITIVE SCALE, INC.
Reel/Frame 051993/0915 →
Continuity (3)
Provisional Application 62838831 · Apr 25, 2019
Provisional Application 62819092 · Mar 15, 2019
Related Publication 20200293839A1 · Sep 17, 2020