IP Library Granted Patent US 10,903,934
Granted Patent B2
US 10,903,934 · App. 16/682,929 · Granted Jan 26, 2021

System and method for controlling time dilation in time-sensitive networks

Inventors: Stephen Francis Bush (Niskayuna, NY); Guillaume Mantelet (Oakbank, CA)
Assignee: General Electric Company
H04K1/00H04J3/0697H04L9/0852H04L9/3297H04L63/0227H04L63/061H04L63/12H04L63/108H04L63/123
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 10,903,934
App. No.
16/682,929
Granted
Jan 26, 2021
Kind
B2
Abstract

A system and method determine a clock drift and a clock variance of each node in plural nodes of a time-sensitive Ethernet network. An accumulated clock offset along a time-sensitive network path in the time-sensitive network is determined based on the clock drifts and the clock variances. A guard band having a dynamic size is determined based on the accumulated clock offset. The times at which Ethernet frames are communicated through the nodes are restricted by communicating the guard band with the dynamic size to one or more of the nodes.

Claims (30)

1. A method comprising:

determining a clock drift and a clock variance of each node in plural nodes of a time-sensitive Ethernet network;

determining an accumulated clock offset along a time-sensitive network path in the time-sensitive network based on the clock drifts and the clock variances that are determined;

determining an eigenvalue centrality metric based on a location of one or more of the nodes in the time-sensitive network;

determining a guard band having a dynamic size based on the accumulated clock offset and the eigenvalue centrality metric, wherein the dynamic size of the guard band is based on the eigenvalue centrality metric; and

restricting when Ethernet frames are communicated through the nodes by communicating the guard band with the dynamic size to one or more of the nodes.

2. The method of claim 1 , further comprising:

determining a rate at which clock synchronization messages are reported to the nodes along the time-sensitive network path,

wherein the dynamic size of the guard band is based on the rate at which clock synchronization messages are reported to the nodes along the time-sensitive network path.

3. The method of claim 1 , further comprising:

inserting the guard band before and after a scheduled window time of forwarding a time-sensitive network frame at each of the nodes.

4. The method of claim 1 , wherein the clock drift and the clock variance are determined for local clock devices of the nodes relative to a master clock device for the Ethernet network.

5. The method of claim 1 , wherein the guard band is determined as one or more of a time period or a bandwidth in which non-time-critical Ethernet frame traffic cannot be communicated through the nodes.

6. The method of claim 1 , wherein the guard band is determined based on distances between clock devices of the nodes and a master clock device of the Ethernet network.

7. The method of claim 1 , wherein the guard band is determined based on one or more of altitudes or speeds of clock devices of the nodes.

8. The method of claim 1 , wherein the guard band is determined based on motion of one or more of the nodes.

9. A system comprising:

one or more processors configured to determine a clock drift and a clock variance of each node in plural nodes of a time-sensitive network, the one or more processors also configured to determine an accumulated clock offset along a time-sensitive network path in the time-sensitive network based on the clock drifts and the clock variances that are determined, the one or more processors also configured to determine a guard band having a dynamic size based on the accumulated clock offset and an eigenvalue centrality metric, the one or more processors configured to communicate the guard band with the dynamic size to the nodes, the one or more processors configured to allocate the guard band to at least one of the nodes, the guard band restricting when Ethernet frames are communicated through the at least one of the nodes,

wherein the one or more processors also are configured to determine the eigenvalue centrality metric based on a location of one or more of the nodes in the time-sensitive network, wherein the one or more processors are configured to determine the dynamic size of the guard band based on the eigenvalue centrality metric.

10. The system of claim 9 , wherein the one or more processors are configured to determine a rate at which clock synchronization messages are reported to the nodes along the time-sensitive network path, wherein the one or more processors are configured to determine the dynamic size of the guard band based on the rate at which clock synchronization messages are reported to the nodes along the time-sensitive network path.

11. The system of claim 9 , wherein the one or more processors are configured to insert the guard band before and after a scheduled window time of forwarding a time-sensitive network frame at each of the nodes.

12. The system of claim 9 , wherein the one or more processors are configured to determine the clock drift and the clock variance for local clock devices of the nodes relative to a master clock device for the Ethernet network.

13. The system of claim 9 , wherein the one or more processors are configured to determine the guard band as one or more of a time period or a bandwidth in which non-time-critical Ethernet frame traffic cannot be communicated through the nodes.

14. The system of claim 9 , wherein the one or more processors are configured to determine distances between clock devices of the nodes and a master clock device of the Ethernet network, the one or more processors also configured to determine the guard band based on the distances that are determined.

15. The system of claim 9 , wherein the one or more processors are configured to determine the guard band based on one or more of altitudes or speeds of clock devices of the nodes.

16. A system comprising:

one or more processors configured to determine clock drifts and clock variances of plural nodes in a time-sensitive Ethernet network, the one or more processors also configured to determine an eigenvalue centrality metric based on a location of one or more of the nodes in the time-sensitive network,

wherein the one or more processors are configured to dynamically allocate a guard band to one or more of the nodes to prevent communication of one or more Ethernet frames through the one or more nodes during the guard band in a time sensitive network schedule of the Ethernet network, the one or more processors configured to dynamically allocate the guard band based on the clock drifts, the clock variances, and the eigenvalue centrality metric, wherein a dynamic size of the guard band is based on the eigenvalue centrality metric.

17. The system of claim 16 , wherein the one or more processors are configured to dynamically allocate the guard band by changing the dynamic size of the guard band responsive to a change in one or more of the clock drifts, the clock variances, or the eigenvalue centrality metric.

18. The system of claim 16 , wherein the one or more processors are configured to determine an accumulated clock offset of the nodes along a path between two or more computer devices based on the clock drifts and the clock variances associated with the nodes along the path, wherein the one or more processor are configured to allocate the guard band based on the accumulated clock offset.

Assignments (2)
CHANGE OF NAME Recorded Jan 30, 2026
From: GE INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY LICENSING, LLC
To: DOLBY INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY LICENSING, LLC
Reel/Frame 074536/0682 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Nov 13, 2019
From: BUSH, STEPHEN FRANCIS; MANTELET, GUILLAUME
To: GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY
Reel/Frame 051000/0566 →