IP Library Patent Application 16731878
Patent Application
App. No. 16/731,878

NON-LINEAR DYNAMIC PRICING FOR TOLLING SYSTEMS

Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US None
App. No.
16/731,878
Abstract

A method includes receiving sensor data from a sensor system associated with a roadway, the sensor data comprising information for speed and timing of vehicles passing within a managed lane of the roadway. The method further includes determining, based on the sensor data a current level-of-service for the managed lane. The method further includes comparing the current level-of-service for the managed lane with a target level-of-service for the managed lane. The method further includes calculating a price adjustment for the managed lane based on a difference between the current level-of-service and the target level-of-service, the price adjustment having a non-linear relationship between the price adjustment and the difference.

Claims (34)

1 . A method comprising:

receiving sensor data from a sensor system associated with a roadway, the sensor data comprising information for speed and timing of vehicles passing within a managed lane of the roadway;

determining, based on the sensor data a current level-of-service for the managed lane;

comparing the current level-of-service for the managed lane with a target level-of-service for the managed lane;

calculating a price adjustment for the managed lane based on a difference between the current level-of-service and the target level-of-service, the price adjustment having a non-linear relationship between the price adjustment and the difference.

2 . The method of claim 1 , wherein the target level-of-service comprising a target average vehicle speed.

3 . The method of claim 1 , wherein the target level-of-service comprises a target average distance between vehicles.

4 . The method of claim 1 , wherein the target level-of-service comprises a target average amount of time in which successive vehicles pass by a fixed point.

5 . The method of claim 1 , wherein the target level-of-service comprises a target volume of vehicles for the managed lane.

6 . The method of claim 1 , wherein target level-of-service is defined relative to a general-purpose lane.

7 . The method of claim 1 , wherein the target level-of-service is an absolute value.

8 . The method of claim 1 , wherein the sensor system includes at least one of: cameras, infrared, RADAR, or LIDAR.

9 . The method of claim 1 , wherein a level-of-service is normalized such that the difference between the current level-of-service and the target level-of-service is zero.

10 . The method of claim 1 , wherein calculating the price adjustment factors in a rate of change of the difference.

11 . The method of claim 10 , wherein calculating the price adjustment uses a function such that when the difference is positive and the current level-of-service is increasing, price is decremented at various amounts as a function of rate of increase for the current level-of-service.

12 . The method of claim 10 , wherein calculating the price adjustment uses a function such that when the difference is positive and the current level-of-service is decreasing by more than a threshold amount, price is incremented at various amounts as a function of rate of decrease for the current level-of-service.

13 . The method of claim 10 , wherein calculating the price adjustment uses a function such that when the difference is negative and the current level-of-service is increasing greater than a threshold amount, price is decremented at various amounts as a function of rate of increase for the current level-of-service.

14 . The method of claim 10 , wherein calculating the price adjustment uses a function such that when the difference is negative and the current level-of-service is decreasing, price is incremented at various amounts as a function of rate of decrease for the current level-of-service.

15 . A method performed by a computing system, the method comprising:

determining a target level-of-service for a managed lane;

with a sensor system, determining a current level-of-service for the managed lane;

displaying a first price for the managed lane;

displaying an adjusted price for the managed lane, the adjusted price being a quantized value and being determined based on a non-linear relationship between price difference and a difference between the current level-of-service and the target level-of-service.

16 . The method of claim 15 , wherein the non-linear relationship is defined by a sigmoid function.

17 . The method of claim 15 , wherein the level-of-service is defined by at least one of: a target average vehicle speed, a target average distance between vehicles, a target average amount of time in which successive vehicles pass by a fixed point, and a target volume of vehicles.

18 . A system comprising:

a processor; and

a memory comprising machine-readable instructions that when executed by the processor, cause the system to:

receive sensor data from a sensor system associated with a roadway, the sensor data comprising information for speed and timing of vehicles passing within a managed lane of the roadway;

determine, based on the sensor data a current level-of-service for the managed lane;

compare the current level-of-service for the managed lane with a target level-of-service for the managed lane;

calculate a price adjustment for the managed lane based on a difference between the current level-of-service and the target level-of-service, the price adjustment having a non-linear relationship between the price adjustment and the difference.

19 . The system of claim 18 , wherein the target level-of-service is defined relative to a general-purpose lane.

20 . The system of claim 18 , wherein the sensor system includes at least one of: cameras, infrared, RADAR, or LIDAR.

Assignments (6)
RELEASE OF INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY SECURITY AGREEMENT Recorded May 14, 2026
From: ROYAL BANK OF CANADA
To: INTERNATIONAL ROAD DYNAMICS INC.; ELECTRONIC TRANSACTION CONSULTANTS, LLC
Reel/Frame 075581/0847 →
SECURITY INTEREST Recorded Sep 27, 2021
From: ELECTRONIC TRANSACTION CONSULTANTS, LLC
To: HSBC BANK CANADA
Reel/Frame 057612/0299 →
RELEASE OF SECURITY INTEREST Recorded Sep 2, 2021
From: CAPITAL SOUTHWEST CORPORATION
To: ELECTRONIC TRANSACTION CONSULTANTS, LLC
Reel/Frame 057367/0778 →
INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY SECURITY AGREEMENT Recorded Aug 13, 2020
From: ELECTRONIC TRANSACTION CONSULTANTS, LLC
To: CAPITAL SOUTHWEST CORPORATION, AS AGENT
Reel/Frame 053495/0098 →
ENTITY CONVERSION Recorded Jul 28, 2020
From: ELECTRONIC TRANSACTION CONSULTANTS CORPORATION
To: ELECTRONIC TRANSACTION CONSULTANTS, LLC
Reel/Frame 053337/0024 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Jan 7, 2020
From: STAGNI, ALESSANDRO
To: ELECTRONIC TRANSACTION CONSULTANTS CORP.
Reel/Frame 051433/0806 →