IP Library Granted Patent US 11,178,556
Granted Patent B2
US 11,178,556 · App. 16/735,007 · Granted Nov 16, 2021

Optimizing performance between a wireless distribution system (WDS) and a macro network(s)

Inventors: Igor Berlin (Potomac, MD); Dror Harel (Hod Hasharon, IL); Yair Zeev Shapira (Shoham, IL)
Assignee: Corning Optical Communications LLC
H04W24/02H04L41/0823H04L41/0896H04L41/5009H04L41/5025H04L41/5067H04W24/10H04W52/243H04L41/5087H04W24/08H04W84/045
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 11,178,556
App. No.
16/735,007
Granted
Nov 16, 2021
Kind
B2
Abstract

Optimizing performance between a wireless distribution system (WDS) and a macro network(s). In this regard, a macro network optimization system is configured to detect a performance indicator(s) between a WDS and a macro network and optimize the performance of the macro network based on the detected performance indicator(s). The macro network optimization system analyzes a macro network performance report provided by the macro network and/or a WDS performance report provided by the WDS to detect the performance indicator(s) between the WDS and the macro network. The macro network optimization system reconfigures operations of one or more macro network elements to optimize performance between the WDS and the macro network based on the detected performance indicator(s). By detecting and optimizing performance between the WDS and the macro network, capacity, throughput, and/or coverage of the WDS and the macro network can be improved, thus providing better quality of experience (QoE).

Claims (62)

1. A performance optimization system for optimizing performance in a wireless distribution system (WDS) communicatively coupled to a macro network, the performance optimization system configured to:

receive a macro network performance report from the macro network;

analyze the macro network performance report to determine at least one performance indicator between the WDS and the macro network; and

reconfigure one or more WDS elements to optimize the performance between the WDS and the macro network based on the at least one performance indicator determined between the WDS and the macro network,

wherein the macro network performance report comprises at least one of a cell trace data, a quality of experience (QoE) report, and cell statistics generated by one or more macro network elements.

2. The performance optimization system according to claim 1 , wherein the performance optimization system is configured to:

analyze the macro network performance report to determine if the at least one performance indicator indicates that radio frequency (RF) interference exists between the WDS and the macro network; and

reconfigure the one or more WDS elements to reduce the RF interference determined to exist between the WDS and the macro network based on the detected RF interference between the WDS and the macro network.

3. The performance optimization system of claim 2 , further configured to:

determine if the RF interference determined to exist between the WDS and the macro network is caused by at least one remote unit; and

cause the at least one remote unit in the WDS to reduce the RF interference between the WDS and the macro network if the RF interference determined to exist between the WDS and the macro network is caused by the at least one remote unit.

4. The performance optimization system of claim 3 , further configured to reconfigure the at least one remote unit to change radiation pattern to reduce the RF interference between the WDS and the macro network.

5. The performance optimization system of claim 4 , further configured to reconfigure the at least one remote unit to transmit in an alternative RF channel to reduce the RF interference between the WDS and the macro network.

6. The performance optimization system of claim 4 , further configured to reconfigure the at least one remote unit to transmit at reduced power to reduce the RF interference between the WDS and the macro network.

7. The performance optimization system of claim 4 , further configured to:

determine if the RF interference determined to exist between the WDS and the macro network is caused by at least one indoor client device; and

cause the at least one indoor client device in the WDS to reduce the RF interference between the WDS and the macro network if the RF interference determined to exist between the WDS and the macro network is caused by the at least one indoor client device.

8. The performance optimization system of claim 7 , further configured to reconfigure the at least one indoor client device to transmit in an alternative RF channel to reduce the RF interference between the WDS and the macro network.

9. The performance optimization system of claim 7 , further configured to reconfigure the at least one indoor client device to transmit at reduced power to reduce the RF interference between the WDS and the macro network.

10. The performance optimization system of claim 1 , further configured to:

receive a WDS performance report from the WDS; and

analyze the WDS performance report and the macro network performance report to determine the at least one performance indicator between the WDS and the macro network.

11. The performance optimization system of claim 10 , wherein the performance optimization system is further configured to analyze the macro network performance report to determine if the at least one performance indicator indicates that radio frequency (RF) interference exists between the WDS and the macro network.

12. The performance optimization system of claim 11 , further configured to:

determine if the RF interference determined to exist between the WDS and the macro network is caused by at least one remote unit; and

reconfigure the at least one remote unit in the WDS to reduce the RF interference between the WDS and the macro network if the RF interference determined to exist between the WDS and the macro network is caused by the at least one remote unit.

13. The performance optimization system of claim 12 , further configured to reconfigure the at least one remote unit to change radiation pattern to reduce the RF interference between the WDS and the macro network.

14. The performance optimization system of claim 12 , further configured to reconfigure the at least one remote unit to transmit in an alternative RF channel to reduce the RF interference between the WDS and the macro network.

15. The performance optimization system of claim 12 , further configured to reconfigure the at least one remote unit to transmit at reduced power to reduce the RF interference between the WDS and the macro network.

16. The performance optimization system of claim 11 , further configured to:

determine if the RF interference determined to exist between the WDS and the macro network is caused by at least one indoor client device; and

cause the at least one indoor client device in the WDS to reduce the RF interference between the WDS and the macro network if the RF interference determined to exist between the WDS and the macro network is caused by the at least one indoor client device.

17. The performance optimization system of claim 16 , further configured to reconfigure the at least one indoor client device to transmit in an alternative RF channel to reduce the RF interference between the WDS and the macro network.

18. The performance optimization system of claim 16 , further configured to reconfigure the at least one indoor client device to transmit at reduced power to reduce the RF interference between the WDS and the macro network.

19. The performance optimization system of claim 10 , wherein the WDS performance report comprises radio frequency (RF) signal information generated by the one or more WDS elements.

20. The performance optimization system of claim 10 , wherein the WDS performance report comprises a quality of experience (QoE) report generated by the one or more WDS elements.

21. The performance optimization system of claim 10 , wherein the WDS performance report comprises a cell trace data generated by the one or more WDS elements.

22. A method for optimizing performance of a wireless distribution system (WDS) communicatively coupled to a macro network, comprising:

receiving a macro network performance report from the macro network;

analyzing the macro network performance report to determine at least one performance indicator between the WDS and the macro network; and

reconfiguring one or more WDS elements to optimize performance between the WDS and the macro network based on the at least one performance indicator determined between the WDS and the macro network.

23. The method of claim 22 , comprising:

analyzing the macro network performance report to determine if the at least one performance indicator indicates that radio frequency (RF) interference exists between the WDS and the macro network; and

reconfiguring the one or more WDS elements to reduce the RF interference determined to exist between the WDS and the macro network based on the detected RF interference between the WDS and the macro network.

24. The method of claim 23 , further comprising:

determining if the RF interference determined to exist between the WDS and the macro network is caused by at least one remote unit; and

causing the at least one remote unit in the WDS to reduce the RF interference between the WDS and the macro network if the RF interference determined to exist between the WDS and the macro network is caused by the at least one remote unit.

25. The method of claim 23 , further comprising:

determining if the RF interference determined to exist between the WDS and the macro network is caused by at least one indoor client device; and

causing the at least one indoor client device in the WDS to reduce the RF interference between the WDS and the macro network if the RF interference determined to exist between the WDS and the macro network is caused by the at least one indoor client device.

26. The method of claim 25 , further comprising reconfiguring the at least one indoor client device to transmit in an alternative RF channel to reduce the RF interference between the WDS and the macro network.

27. The method of claim 25 , further comprising reconfiguring the at least one indoor client device to transmit at reduced power to reduce the RF interference between the WDS and the macro network.

28. The method of claim 24 , further comprising receiving a WDS performance report and analyzing the WDS performance report and the macro network performance report to determine the at least one performance indicator between the WDS and the macro network.

29. The method of claim 28 , comprising:

analyzing the WDS performance report and the macro network performance report to determine if the at least one performance indicator indicates that radio frequency (RF) interference exists between the WDS and the macro network; and

reconfiguring the one or more WDS elements to reduce the RF interference determined to exist between the WDS and the macro network based on the detected RF interference between the WDS and the macro network.

30. The method of claim 29 , further comprising:

determining if the RF interference determined to exist between the WDS and the macro network is caused by at least one remote unit; and

causing the at least one remote unit in the WDS to reduce the RF interference between the WDS and the macro network if the RF interference determined to exist between the WDS and the macro network is caused by the at least one remote unit.

31. The method of claim 29 , further comprising:

determining if the RF interference determined to exist between the WDS and the macro network is caused by at least one indoor client device; and

causing the at least one indoor client device in the WDS to reduce the RF interference between the WDS and the macro network if the RF interference determined to exist between the WDS and the macro network is caused by the at least one indoor client device.

Assignments (2)
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded May 12, 2025
From: CORNING OPTICAL COMMUNICATIONS LLC
To: ANI ACQUISITION SUB, LLC
Reel/Frame 071270/0328 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Jan 6, 2020
From: BERLIN, IGOR; HAREL, DROR; SHAPIRA, YAIR ZEEV
To: CORNING OPTICAL COMMUNICATIONS LLC
Reel/Frame 051426/0269 →