System and method of intelligent detection of data model fieldname lineage with geographical location movement control
An information handling system operating a data integration protection assistance system may comprise a processor linking first and second data set field names identified within a previous execution of a data integration process for transferring a data set field value identified by the first data field name at a source geographic location to a destination geographic location for storage under the second data field name. The processor may receive a user instruction to associate data set field names labeled as sensitive private individual data with a barred geographic location, determine the second data set field name is labeled as sensitive private individual data and the destination storage location matches the barred geographic location. A graphical user interface may display a notice that the data set field value was stored during the previously executed integration process within the barred geographic location.
1. An information handling system operating a data integration protection assistance system comprising:
a processor device executing code instructions to link, within a data naming lineage map, a first data set field name and a second data set field name identified within code instructions for a previous execution of a data integration process for accessing a data set identified by the first data set field name at a source storage location and to migrate the data set and rename it to a second data set field name to a destination storage location,
wherein the data naming lineage map further associates the data set with a source geographic location and a destination geographic location;
the processor device to receive a user instruction to associate data set field names labeled as sensitive private individual data with a user-defined, barred geographic location;
the processor device to determine the second data set field name is labeled as sensitive private individual data and the destination storage location matches the user-defined, barred geographic location; and
a graphical user interface to display a notice that the data set identified with the second data set field name was stored during the previously executed integration process at the user-defined, barred geographic location.
2. The information handling system of claim 1 further comprising:
the graphical user interface to display a name of an individual included within the data set field value.
3. The information handling system of claim 1 further comprising:
the graphical user interface to display a description of a process performed on the data set field value within the code instructions of the data integration process.
4. The information handling system of claim 1 further comprising:
a network interface device to automatically transmit updated machine-executable code instructions for the data integration process at routine intervals for execution by a run-time engine at a remote location according to a preset schedule.
5. The information handling system of claim 4 further comprising: the processor device to create the updated machine-executable code instructions for the data integration process to automatically inhibit transmission of the data set field value to the user-defined, barred geographic location.
6. The information handling system of claim 4 further comprising: the processor device to create the updated machine-executable code instructions for the data integration process to automatically transmit the data set field value to a preset, user-specified location, not within the user-defined, barred geographic location.
7. The information handling system of claim 4 , wherein the updated machine-executable code instructions for the data integration process does not inhibit transmission of a dataset field value labeled as sensitive private individual data to the barred geographic location.
8. A method for protecting data during integration comprising:
linking, via a processor, within a data naming lineage map, a first data set field name and a second data set field name identified within code instructions for a previous execution of a data integration process for accessing a data set field value identified by the first data set field name at a source storage location, and for transferring and renaming the data set field value to a destination storage location, identified by the second data set field name;
associating, via the processor, within the data naming lineage map, the data set field value with a source geographic location and a destination geographic location;
receiving a user instruction to associate data set field names labeled as sensitive private individual data with a user-defined, barred geographic location;
determining, via the processor, the second data set field name is labeled as sensitive private individual data and the destination storage location matches the user-defined, barred geographic location; and
displaying, via a graphical user interface, a notice that the data set field value was stored during the previously executed integration process within the user-defined, barred geographic location.
9. The method of claim 8 further comprising:
displaying a name of an individual included within the data set field value, via the graphical user interface.
10. The method of claim 8 further comprising:
displaying, via the graphical user interface, a description of a process performed on the data set field value within the code instructions of the data integration process.
11. The method of claim 8 further comprising:
automatically transmitting, via a network interface device, updated machine-executable code instructions for the data integration process at routine intervals for execution by a run-time engine at a remote location according to a preset schedule.
12. The method of claim 11 further comprising:
generating, via the processor, the updated machine-executable code instructions for the data integration process to automatically inhibit transmission of the data set field value to the user-defined, barred geographic location.
13. The method of claim 11 further comprising:
generating, via the processor, the updated machine-executable code instructions for the data integration process to automatically transmit the data set field value to a preset, user-specified location, not within the user-defined, barred geographic location.
14. The method of claim 11 , wherein the updated machine-executable code instructions for the data integration process does not inhibit transmission of a dataset field value labeled as sensitive private individual data to the barred geographic location.
15. An information handling system operating a data integration protection assistance system comprising:
a network interface device automatically transmitting updated machine-executable code instructions for a data integration process at routine intervals for execution by a run-time engine at a remote location according to a preset schedule;
a processor linking, within a data naming lineage map, a first data set field name and a second data set field name identified within code instructions for a previous execution of the data integration process for accessing a data set field value identified by the first data set field name at a source storage location, and for transferring and renaming the data set field value to a destination storage location, identified by the second data set field name;
wherein the data naming lineage map associates the data set field value with a source geographic location and a destination geographic location;
the processor receiving a user instruction to associate data set field names labeled as sensitive private individual data with a user-defined, barred geographic location;
the processor determining the second data set field name is labeled as sensitive private individual data and the destination storage location matches the user-defined, barred geographic location; and
a graphical user interface displaying a notice that the data set field value was stored during the previously executed integration process within the user-defined, barred geographic location.
16. The information handling system of claim 15 further comprising: the graphical user interface displaying a name of an individual included within the data set field value.
17. The information handling system of claim 15 further comprising:
the graphical user interface displaying a description of a process performed on the data set field value within the code instructions of the first data integration process.
18. The information handling system of claim 15 further comprising:
the processor creating the updated machine-executable code instructions for the data integration process to automatically inhibit transmission of the data set field value to the user-defined, barred geographic location.
19. The information handling system of claim 15 further comprising:
the processor creating the updated machine-executable code instructions for the data integration process to automatically transmit the data set field value to a preset, user-specified location, not within the user-defined, barred geographic location.
20. The information handling system of claim 15 , wherein the updated machine-executable code instructions for the data integration process does not inhibit transmission of a dataset field value labeled as sensitive private individual data to the barred geographic location.