Alarm signaling technology
Techniques are described for handling an event where a control panel or an alarm signaling device is tampered with or destroyed by a disablement tactic, e.g., a “crash and smash intrusion.”
1. A server comprising:
at least one processor; and
at least one non-transitory computer-readable storage medium coupled to the at least one processor having stored thereon instructions which, when executed by the at least one processor, causes the at least one processor to perform operations comprising:
monitoring signaling quality for signals received from at least one component of a monitoring system;
determining signaling quality for the at least one component of the monitoring system based on the monitoring;
determining a wait time for processing sensor data from the monitoring system based on the determined signaling quality for the at least one component of the monitoring system; and
processing the sensor data from the monitoring system based on the determined wait time for processing sensor data from the monitoring system.
2. The server of claim 1 , wherein determining the wait time for processing sensor data from the monitoring system based on the determined signaling quality for the at least one component of the monitoring system comprises dynamically setting an escrow period for sensor data from the at least one component of the monitoring system based on the determined signaling quality for the at least one component of the monitoring system.
3. The server of claim 1 , wherein determining the wait time for processing sensor data from the monitoring system based on the determined signaling quality for the at least one component of the monitoring system comprises setting a relatively short wait time for sensor data from the at least one component of the monitoring system based on the determined signaling quality being a relatively high signal quality and setting a relatively long wait time for sensor data from the at least one component of the monitoring system based on the determined signaling quality being a relatively low signal quality.
4. The server of claim 1 :
wherein monitoring signaling quality for signals received from at least one component of the monitoring system comprises measuring signal strength for signals received from the at least one component of the monitoring system; and
wherein determining signaling quality for the at least one component of the monitoring system based on the monitoring comprises determining an average or median signal strength for signals received from the at least one component of the monitoring system.
5. The server of claim 1 :
wherein monitoring signaling quality for signals received from at least one component of the monitoring system comprises measuring latency of signals received from the at least one component of the monitoring system; and
wherein determining signaling quality for the at least one component of the monitoring system based on the monitoring comprises determining an average or median latency of signals received from the at least one component of the monitoring system.
6. The server of claim 1 :
wherein monitoring signaling quality for signals received from at least one component of the monitoring system comprises measuring signal to noise ratio of signals received from the at least one component of the monitoring system; and
wherein determining signaling quality for the at least one component of the monitoring system based on the monitoring comprises determining an average or median signal to noise ratio of signals received from the at least one component of the monitoring system.
7. The server of claim 1 :
wherein monitoring signaling quality for signals received from at least one component of the monitoring system comprises tracking whether signals received from the at least one component of the monitoring system result in communication errors; and
wherein determining signaling quality for the at least one component of the monitoring system based on the monitoring comprises determining an error rate of signals received from the at least one component of the monitoring system.
8. The server of claim 1 , wherein determining signaling quality for the at least one component of the monitoring system based on the monitoring comprises determining one or more signaling quality statistics for a particular number of outlier signaling events for signals received from the at least one component of the monitoring system.
9. The server of claim 1 , wherein processing the sensor data from the monitoring system based on the determined wait time for processing sensor data from the monitoring system comprises:
requiring exchange of pinging communications before issuing an alarm signal based on the determined signaling quality being a relatively low signal quality; and
allowing an alarm signal to be issued without requiring exchange of pinging communications based on the determined signaling quality being a relatively high signal quality.
10. The server of claim 1 , wherein determining signaling quality for the at least one component of the monitoring system based on the monitoring comprises determining one or more signaling quality statistics for the at least one component of the monitoring system based on the monitoring.
11. A method comprising:
monitoring signaling quality for signals received from at least one component of a monitoring system;
determining signaling quality for the at least one component of the monitoring system based on the monitoring;
determining a wait time for processing sensor data from the monitoring system based on the determined signaling quality for the at least one component of the monitoring system; and
processing the sensor data from the monitoring system based on the determined wait time for processing sensor data from the monitoring system.
12. The method of claim 11 , wherein determining the wait time for processing sensor data from the monitoring system based on the determined signaling quality for the at least one component of the monitoring system comprises dynamically setting an escrow period for sensor data from the at least one component of the monitoring system based on the determined signaling quality for the at least one component of the monitoring system.
13. The method of claim 11 , wherein determining the wait time for processing sensor data from the monitoring system based on the determined signaling quality for the at least one component of the monitoring system comprises setting a relatively short wait time for sensor data from the at least one component of the monitoring system based on the determined signaling quality being a relatively high signal quality and setting a relatively long wait time for sensor data from the at least one component of the monitoring system based on the determined signaling quality being a relatively low signal quality.
14. The method of claim 11 :
wherein monitoring signaling quality for signals received from at least one component of the monitoring system comprises measuring signal strength for signals received from the at least one component of the monitoring system; and
wherein determining signaling quality for the at least one component of the monitoring system based on the monitoring comprises determining an average or median signal strength for signals received from the at least one component of the monitoring system.
15. The method of claim 11 :
wherein monitoring signaling quality for signals received from at least one component of the monitoring system comprises measuring latency of signals received from the at least one component of the monitoring system; and
wherein determining signaling quality for the at least one component of the monitoring system based on the monitoring comprises determining an average or median latency of signals received from the at least one component of the monitoring system.
16. The method of claim 11 :
wherein monitoring signaling quality for signals received from at least one component of the monitoring system comprises measuring signal to noise ratio of signals received from the at least one component of the monitoring system; and
wherein determining signaling quality for the at least one component of the monitoring system based on the monitoring comprises determining an average or median signal to noise ratio of signals received from the at least one component of the monitoring system.
17. The method of claim 11 :
wherein monitoring signaling quality for signals received from at least one component of the monitoring system comprises tracking whether signals received from the at least one component of the monitoring system result in communication errors; and
wherein determining signaling quality for the at least one component of the monitoring system based on the monitoring comprises determining an error rate of signals received from the at least one component of the monitoring system.
18. The method of claim 11 , wherein determining signaling quality for the at least one component of the monitoring system based on the monitoring comprises determining one or more signaling quality statistics for a particular number of outlier signaling events for signals received from the at least one component of the monitoring system.
19. The method of claim 11 , wherein processing the sensor data from the monitoring system based on the determined wait time for processing sensor data from the monitoring system comprises:
requiring exchange of pinging communications before issuing an alarm signal based on the determined signaling quality being a relatively low signal quality; and
allowing an alarm signal to be issued without requiring exchange of pinging communications based on the determined signaling quality being a relatively high signal quality.
20. The method of claim 11 , wherein determining signaling quality for the at least one component of the monitoring system based on the monitoring comprises determining one or more signaling quality statistics for the at least one component of the monitoring system based on the monitoring.