IP Library Granted Patent US 11,909,882
Granted Patent B2
US 11,909,882 · App. 16/777,415 · Granted Feb 20, 2024

Systems and methods to cryptographically verify an identity of an information handling system

Inventors: Charles D. Robison (Buford, GA); Nicholas D. Grobelny (Austin, TX); Amy C. Nelson (Round Rock, TX)
Assignee: Dell Products L.P.
H04L9/3234H04L9/0897H04L9/3263H04L63/0442
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 11,909,882
App. No.
16/777,415
Granted
Feb 20, 2024
Kind
B2
Abstract

Various embodiments of systems and methods are provided to bind a system identifier that uniquely identifies an information handling system (IHS) to the system platform, so that the identity of the IHS can be cryptographically verified. More specifically, the present disclosure provides methods to bind a unique system identifier to an IHS platform, and methods to cryptographically verify the identity of the IHS using the unique system identifier and a plurality of keys generated and stored with a Trusted Platform Module (TPM) of the IHS. Systems are provided herein to perform such methods. As such, the systems and methods disclosed herein enable system identity to be irrefutably verified, thereby preventing theft and misuse of system identity.

Claims (68)

1. A system, comprising:

a plurality of information handling systems (IHSs), each having:

a processing device;

a computer readable storage device configured to store a verification application and a unique system identifier that uniquely identifies the IHS; and

a trusted platform module (TPM) configured to store a private Endorsement Key (EK), an EK certificate containing a public EK, a public signing key and a private signing key; and

a first remote system comprising a first computer readable medium configured to store an entitlement database for the plurality of IHSs, wherein for each IHS, the entitlement database associates the unique system identifier specified for the IHS with the EK certificate and the public signing key stored within the TPM of the IHS; and

a second remote system coupled, via a network, to the first remote system and to the plurality of IHSs, wherein the second remote system comprises a second computer readable medium configured to store verification software and a processing device, and wherein upon receiving a verification request from a first IHS to verify an identity of the first IHS, the processing device of the second remote system is configured to execute the verification software to communicate with the first remote system and the first IHS to cryptographically verify the identity of the first IHS;

wherein upon receiving the verification request from the first IHS to verify an identity of the first IHS, the processing device of the second remote system is configured to execute the verification software to:

receive a unique system identifier specified for the first IHS along with the verification request, and

retrieve the EK certificate and the public signing key associated with the unique system identifier from the entitlement database stored within the first computer readable medium of the first remote system;

wherein the processing device of the second remote system is further configured to execute the verification software to:

generate a nonce,

encrypt the nonce with a public EK obtained from the EK certificate; and

transmit the encrypted nonce to the first IHS; and

wherein the processing device of the first IHS is configured to execute the verification application to:

send the verification request and the unique system identifier specified for the first IHS to the second remote system,

receive the encrypted nonce from the second remote system,

decrypt the encrypted nonce using the private EK stored within the TPM of the first IHS,

sign the nonce and the unique system identifier using the private signing key stored within the TPM of the first IHS, and

transmit a signed message containing the nonce and the unique system identifier to the second remote system.

2. The system as recited in claim 1 , wherein the processing device of the second remote system is further configured to execute the verification software to:

receive the signed message containing the nonce and the unique system identifier;

verify the nonce and the unique system identifier contained within the signed message using the public signing key retrieved from the entitlement database stored within the first remote system; and

transmit a verification response to the first IHS.

3. The system as recited in claim 2 , wherein the processing device of the second remote system is configured to execute the verification software to transmit a verification response to the first IHS confirming the identity of the first IHS if:

the nonce contained within the signed message matches the nonce generated by the second remote system; and

the unique system identifier contained within the signed message matches the unique system identifier sent with the verification request.

4. The system as recited in claim 2 , wherein the processing device of the second remote system is configured to execute the verification software to transmit a verification response to the first IHS denying the identity of the first IHS if:

the nonce contained within the signed message does not match the nonce generated by the second remote system; or

the unique system identifier contained within the signed message does not match the unique system identifier sent with the verification request.

5. The system as recited in claim 2 , wherein the processing device of the first IHS is further configured to execute the verification application to:

receive the verification response from the second remote system; and

perform one or more actions based on the verification response.

6. The system as recited in claim 5 , wherein if the verification response denies the identity of the first IHS, the one or more actions performed by the first IHS include alerting an administrator that the identity of the first IHS has been modified, revoking user access to the first IHS, deleting data or program code, and/or limiting functionality of the first IHS.

7. A method performed by an information handling system (IHS) to verify an identity of the IHS, the method comprising:

generating and storing a plurality of keys within a trusted platform module (TPM) of the IHS, wherein the plurality of keys includes a public signing key and a private signing key;

sending a verification request to verify the identity of the IHS, along with a unique system identifier specified for the IHS, to a remote system; and

communicating with the remote system to cryptographically verify the identity of the IHS, wherein said communicating comprises:

receiving an encrypted nonce from the remote system;

decrypting the encrypted nonce using a private Endorsement Key (EK) stored within the TPM;

signing the nonce and the unique system identifier using the private signing key stored within the TPM;

transmitting a signed message containing the nonce and the unique system identifier to the remote system; and

receiving a verification response from the remote system.

8. The method as recited in claim 7 , wherein said receiving a verification response comprises receiving a verification response from the remote system confirming the identity of the IHS if:

the nonce contained within the signed message matches the nonce received from the remote system; and

the unique system identifier contained within the signed message matches the unique system identifier sent along with the verification request.

9. The method as recited in claim 7 , wherein said receiving a verification response comprises receiving a verification response from the remote system denying the identity of the IHS if:

the nonce contained within the signed message does not match the nonce received from the remote system; or

the unique system identifier contained within the signed message does not match the unique system identifier sent along with the verification request.

10. The method as recited in claim 7 , further comprising performing one or more actions based upon the verification request received from the remote system.

11. The method as recited in claim 10 , wherein if the verification response denies the identity of the IHS, said performing one or more actions includes alerting an administrator that the identity of the IHS has been modified, revoking user access to the IHS, deleting data or program code, and/or limiting functionality of the IHS.

12. A method performed by a remote system to verify an identity of an information handling system (IHS), the method comprising:

receiving a verification request to verify the identity of the IHS, along with a unique system identifier specified for the IHS;

using the unique system identifier to retrieve an Endorsement Key (EK) certificate and a public signing key associated with the unique system identifier from an entitlement database stored within another remote system; and

communicating with the IHS over a network to cryptographically verify the identity of the IHS, wherein said communicating comprises:

generating a nonce;

encrypting the nonce with a public EK obtained from the EK certificate; and

transmitting the encrypted nonce to the IHS;

wherein said communicating further comprises:

receiving a signed message containing the nonce and the unique system identifier, wherein the signed message is generated by a trusted platform module (TPM) of the IHS using a private signing key stored within the TPM,

using the public signing key retrieved from the entitlement database to verify the nonce and the unique system identifier contained within the signed message, and

transmitting a verification response to the IHS.

13. The method as recited in claim 12 , wherein said transmitting a verification response comprises transmitting a verification response confirming the identity of the IHS if:

the nonce contained within the signed message matches the generated nonce; and

the unique system identifier contained within the signed message matches the unique system identifier received along with the verification request.

14. The method as recited in claim 12 , wherein said transmitting a verification response comprises transmitting a verification response denying the identity of the IHS if:

the nonce contained within the signed message does not match the generated nonce; or

the unique system identifier contained within the signed message does not match the unique system identifier received along with the verification request.

Assignments (9)
RELEASE OF SECURITY INTEREST IN PATENTS PREVIOUSLY RECORDED AT REEL/FRAME (053311/0169) Recorded Jun 23, 2022
From: THE BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON TRUST COMPANY, N.A., AS NOTES COLLATERAL AGENT
To: DELL PRODUCTS L.P.; EMC CORPORATION; EMC IP HOLDING COMPANY LLC
Reel/Frame 060438/0742 →
RELEASE OF SECURITY INTEREST IN PATENTS PREVIOUSLY RECORDED AT REEL/FRAME (053546/0001) Recorded Jun 23, 2022
From: THE BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON TRUST COMPANY, N.A., AS NOTES COLLATERAL AGENT
To: DELL MARKETING L.P. (ON BEHALF OF ITSELF AND AS SUCCESSOR-IN-INTEREST TO CREDANT TECHNOLOGIES, INC.); DELL INTERNATIONAL L.L.C.; DELL PRODUCTS L.P.; DELL USA L.P.; EMC CORPORATION; DELL MARKETING CORPORATION (SUCCESSOR-IN-INTEREST TO FORCE10 NETWORKS, INC. AND WYSE TECHNOLOGY L.L.C.); EMC IP HOLDING COMPANY LLC
Reel/Frame 071642/0001 →
RELEASE OF SECURITY INTEREST IN PATENTS PREVIOUSLY RECORDED AT REEL/FRAME (052216/0758) Recorded Jun 23, 2022
From: THE BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON TRUST COMPANY, N.A., AS NOTES COLLATERAL AGENT
To: DELL PRODUCTS L.P.; EMC IP HOLDING COMPANY LLC
Reel/Frame 060438/0680 →
RELEASE OF SECURITY INTEREST AF REEL 052243 FRAME 0773 Recorded Nov 2, 2021
From: CREDIT SUISSE AG, CAYMAN ISLANDS BRANCH
To: DELL PRODUCTS L.P.; EMC IP HOLDING COMPANY LLC
Reel/Frame 058001/0152 →
SECURITY INTEREST Recorded Jun 5, 2020
From: DELL PRODUCTS L.P.; EMC CORPORATION; EMC IP HOLDING COMPANY LLC
To: THE BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON TRUST COMPANY, N.A., AS COLLATERAL AGENT
Reel/Frame 053311/0169 →
SECURITY AGREEMENT Recorded Apr 22, 2020
From: CREDANT TECHNOLOGIES INC.; DELL INTERNATIONAL L.L.C.; DELL MARKETING L.P.; DELL PRODUCTS L.P.; DELL USA L.P.; EMC CORPORATION; FORCE10 NETWORKS, INC.; WYSE TECHNOLOGY L.L.C.; EMC IP HOLDING COMPANY LLC
To: THE BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON TRUST COMPANY, N.A.
Reel/Frame 053546/0001 →
SECURITY AGREEMENT Recorded Mar 26, 2020
From: DELL PRODUCTS L.P.; EMC IP HOLDING COMPANY LLC
To: CREDIT SUISSE AG, CAYMAN ISLANDS BRANCH
Reel/Frame 052243/0773 →
PATENT SECURITY AGREEMENT (NOTES) Recorded Mar 24, 2020
From: DELL PRODUCTS L.P.; EMC IP HOLDING COMPANY LLC
To: THE BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON TRUST COMPANY, N.A., AS COLLATERAL AGENT
Reel/Frame 052216/0758 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Jan 30, 2020
From: ROBISON, CHARLES D.; GROBELNY, NICHOLAS D.; NELSON, AMY C.
To: DELL PRODUCTS L.P.
Reel/Frame 051676/0241 →