IP Library Granted Patent US 10,880,803
Granted Patent B1
US 10,880,803 · App. 16/778,512 · Granted Dec 29, 2020

Dynamically managing relay nodes in a wireless network

Inventors: Sreekar Marupaduga (Overland Park, KS); Rajveen Narendran (Olathe, KS)
Assignee: Sprint Spectrum L.P.
H04W36/26H04W36/08H04W36/22H04W84/047
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 10,880,803
App. No.
16/778,512
Granted
Dec 29, 2020
Kind
B1
Abstract

Methods, processing nodes, and systems are provided for managing relay nodes in a wireless network. A number of relay nodes attached to a donor access node can be determined. A number of latency sensitive wireless devices attached to the relay nodes can be determined. A latency sensitive wireless device can be a wireless device running a latency sensitive application. A latency sensitive relay node can be a relay node attached to the donor access node having an attached latency sensitive wireless device. A maximum number of relay nodes attached to the donor access node can be set, for example, based on the number of latency sensitive wireless devices attached to latency sensitive relay nodes.

Claims (28)

1. A method comprising:

determining a number of latency sensitive relay nodes attached to a donor access node, wherein a latency sensitive relay node is a relay node having an attached latency sensitive wireless device, a latency sensitive wireless device being a wireless device running a latency sensitive application; and

setting a maximum number of latency sensitive relay nodes attached to the donor access node.

2. The method of claim 1 , wherein the setting is based on the number of latency sensitive relay nodes.

3. The method of claim 2 , further comprising determining a number of latency sensitive wireless devices attached directly to the donor access node, wherein the setting is further based on the number of latency sensitive wireless devices attached directly to the donor access node.

4. The method of claim 1 , wherein the setting is based on one or both of a quality of service (QOS) parameter and a physical resource block (PRB) utilization.

5. The method of claim 1 , further comprising reducing the number of latency sensitive relay nodes attached to the donor access node based on the maximum number of latency sensitive relay nodes set.

6. The method of claim 5 , wherein the reduction comprises handing over at least one latency sensitive relay node to another frequency bandwidth, another donor access node, or another radio access technology (RAT), or a combination thereof.

7. The method of claim 6 , wherein the handing over is to another donor access node that has fewer latency sensitive relay nodes attached than the donor access node.

8. The method of claim 5 , wherein the reduction is performed by handing over all latency sensitive wireless devices attached to the latency sensitive relay node.

9. A method comprising:

setting a maximum number of latency sensitive relay nodes attached to a donor access node based on a number of latency sensitive wireless devices attached to the latency sensitive relay nodes, wherein a latency sensitive wireless device is a wireless device running a latency sensitive application and a latency sensitive relay node is a relay node attached to the donor access node having an attached latency sensitive wireless device; and

reducing a number of latency sensitive relay nodes attached to the donor access node.

10. The method of claim 9 , wherein the reduction comprises handing over at least one latency sensitive relay node to another frequency bandwidth, another donor access node, or another radio access technology (RAT), or a combination thereof.

11. The method of claim 10 , wherein the handing over is to another donor access node that has fewer latency sensitive relay nodes attached than the donor access node.

12. The method of claim 9 , wherein the reduction is performed by handing over all latency sensitive wireless devices attached to the latency sensitive relay node.

13. The method of claim 9 , wherein the reduction occurs once the maximum number of latency sensitive relays nodes set is reached.

14. The method of claim 9 , wherein the reduction is delayed by a predetermined time after the maximum number of latency sensitive relays nodes set is reached.

15. The method of claim 9 , wherein setting a maximum number of latency sensitive relay nodes comprises setting a range of numbers comprising the maximum number, and the reduction occurs within the set range.

16. A method comprising:

determining a number of latency sensitive wireless devices attached to each relay node attached to a donor access node, wherein a latency sensitive wireless device is a wireless device running a latency sensitive application; and

handing over a relay node when a handover threshold is exceeded.

17. The method of claim 16 , wherein the relay node handed over is a latency sensitive relay node, a latency sensitive relay node being a relay node having an attached latency sensitive wireless device.

18. The method of claim 16 , further comprising:

assigning a weight to each relay node, the weight positively correlated to a number of latency sensitive wireless devices attached to a respective relay node; and

prioritizing a first relay node over a second relay node for handover when the first relay node is weighed heavier than the second relay node.

19. The method of claim 16 , wherein handing over the relay node comprises handing over to another frequency bandwidth, another donor access node, or another radio access technology (RAT), or a combination thereof.

20. The method of claim 16 , wherein the donor access node is a first donor access node and the handover threshold comprises a comparative measure of an operating parameter for the first donor access node relative to the operating parameter for a second donor access node.

Assignments (4)
RELEASE OF SECURITY INTEREST Recorded Aug 23, 2022
From: DEUTSCHE BANK TRUST COMPANY AMERICAS
To: IBSV LLC; LAYER3 TV, LLC; PUSHSPRING, LLC; T-MOBILE CENTRAL LLC; T-MOBILE USA, INC.; ASSURANCE WIRELESS USA, L.P.; BOOST WORLDWIDE, LLC; CLEARWIRE COMMUNICATIONS LLC; CLEARWIRE IP HOLDINGS LLC; SPRINTCOM LLC; SPRINT COMMUNICATIONS COMPANY L.P.; SPRINT INTERNATIONAL INCORPORATED; SPRINT SPECTRUM LLC
Reel/Frame 062595/0001 →
CHANGE OF NAME Recorded Feb 11, 2022
From: SPRINT SPECTRUM L.P.
To: SPRINT SPECTRUM LLC
Reel/Frame 059044/0022 →
SECURITY AGREEMENT Recorded Apr 2, 2020
From: T-MOBILE USA, INC.; ISBV LLC; T-MOBILE CENTRAL LLC; LAYER3 TV, INC.; PUSHSPRING, INC.; BOOST WORLDWIDE, LLC; CLEARWIRE COMMUNICATIONS LLC; CLEARWIRE IP HOLDINGS LLC; CLEARWIRE LEGACY LLC; SPRINT COMMUNICATIONS COMPANY L.P.; SPRINT INTERNATIONAL INCORPORATED; SPRINT SPECTRUM L.P.; ASSURANCE WIRELESS USA, L.P.
To: DEUTSCHE BANK TRUST COMPANY AMERICAS
Reel/Frame 053182/0001 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Jan 31, 2020
From: MARUPADUGA, SREEKAR; NARENDRAN, RAJVEEN
To: SPRINT SPECTRUM LP
Reel/Frame 051686/0091 →
Continuity (1)
Continuation 16513849 · Jul 17, 2019