IP Library Granted Patent US 10,912,636
Granted Patent B2
US 10,912,636 · App. 16/784,594 · Granted Feb 9, 2021

Textured surfaces for breast implants

Inventors: Ardeshir Bayat (Manchester, GB); Ernie Hill (Manchester, GB); Daniel Kyle (Sunderland, GB); Antonios Oikonomou (Manchester, GB)
Assignee: Establishment Labs S.A.
A61F2/0077A61F2/12G03F7/0037H01J37/3056A61F2002/0081A61F2002/0086A61F2240/004B29C64/112B29K2083/00B29L2031/7532B33Y10/00B33Y80/00H01J2237/3174
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 10,912,636
App. No.
16/784,594
Granted
Feb 9, 2021
Kind
B2
Abstract

The invention provides new devices for implantation in a patient having irregular textured surfaces, which devices show significantly improved cellular response compared to conventional smooth and textured implants, indicating that significantly improved biocompatihility would be achieved in vivo. Methods for making such new devices and surface textures are also disclosed.

Claims (39)

1. A breast implant comprising a textured surface having:

a mean surface roughness Sa value of from 2 μm to 12 μm at an area scale of 1 mm×1 mm;

a mean surface skewness Ssk value of from −0.7 to +0.7 at an area scale of 1 mm×1 mm;

a mean excess kurtosis value (Sku minus 3) of −1.0 to +1.0 at an area scale of 1 mm×1 mm; and

a maximum peak height to trough depth Sz value from 10 μm to 80 μm at an area scale of 1 mm×1 mm;

wherein the textured surface comprises silicone.

2. The breast implant of claim 1 , wherein the textured surface has a mean surface roughness Sa value of from 3 μm to 9 μm at an area scale of 1 mm×1 mm.

3. The breast implant of claim 1 , wherein the textured surface has a ratio of average peak height to average trough depth of from 2:3 to 3:2 at an area scale of 1 mm×1 mm.

4. The breast implant of claim 1 , wherein the textured surface has a mean excess kurtosis value (Sku minus 3) of from −0.7 to +0.7 at an area scale of 1 mm×1 mm.

5. The breast implant of claim 1 , wherein the textured surface has a mean excess kurtosis value (Sku minus 3) of from −0.5 to +0.5 at an area scale of 1 mm×1 mm.

6. The breast implant of claim 1 , wherein the textured surface comprises polydimethylsiloxane.

7. The breast implant of claim 1 , wherein the textured surface has a root mean square height Sq value of from 4 μm to 15 μm at an area scale of 1 mm×1 mm.

8. The breast implant of claim 1 , wherein the mean surface roughness Sa value, the mean surface skewness Ssk value, the mean excess kurtosis value (Sku minus 3), and the maximum peak height to trough depth Sz value at an area scale of 1 mm×1 mm characterize a primary surface topography of the textured surface, and wherein the textured surface has a secondary surface topography superimposed on the primary surface topography, the secondary surface topography having a mean surface skewness Ssk value of from −1.0 to +1.0 at an area scale of 90 μm×90 μm.

9. The breast implant of claim 8 , wherein the secondary surface topography has a mean excess kurtosis value (Sku minus 3) of −1.5 to +1.5 at an area scale of 90 μm×90 μm.

10. The breast implant of claim 8 , wherein the textured surface has a tertiary surface topography superimposed on the primary surface topography and the secondary surface topography, the tertiary surface topography having a mean excess kurtosis value (Sku minus 3) of −1.5 to +1.5 at an area scale of 10 μm×10 μm.

11. A breast implant comprising a textured surface having a primary surface topography and a secondary surface topography superimposed on the primary surface topography;

wherein the primary surface topography has, at an area scale of 1 mm×1 mm:

a mean surface roughness Sa value of from 2 μm to 12 μm;

a mean surface skewness Ssk value of from −0.7 to +0.7; and

a mean excess kurtosis value (Sku minus 3) of −0.5 to +0.5;

wherein the secondary surface topography has, at an area scale of 90 μm×90 μm:

a mean surface skewness Ssk value of from −1.0 to +1.0; and

wherein textured surface comprises silicone.

12. The breast implant of claim 11 , wherein the primary surface topography has, at an area scale of 1 mm×1 mm, a maximum peak height to trough depth Sz value from 10 μm to 80 μm.

13. The breast implant of claim 11 , wherein the primary surface topography of the textured surface has a mean surface roughness Sa value of from 3 μm to 9 μm at an area scale of 1 mm×1 mm.

14. The breast implant of claim 11 , wherein the secondary surface topography of the textured surface has mean surface skewness Ssk value of from −0.7 to +0.7 at an area scale of 90 μm×90 μm.

15. The breast implant of claim 11 , wherein the textured surface has a tertiary surface topography superimposed on the primary surface topography and the secondary surface topography, the tertiary surface topography having a mean excess kurtosis value (Sku minus 3) of −1.5 to +1.5 at an area scale of 10 μm×10 μm.

16. A breast implant comprising a textured surface having:

a mean surface roughness Sa value of from 3 μm to 9 μm at an area scale of 1 mm×1 mm;

a mean surface skewness Ssk value of from −0.7 to +0.7 at an area scale of 1 mm×1 mm;

a mean excess kurtosis value (Sku minus 3) of −0.7 to +0.7 at an area scale of 1 mm×1 mm;

a root mean square height Sq value of from 4 μm to 15 μm at an area scale of 1 mm×1 min;

a maximum peak height to trough depth Sz value from 10 μm to 80 μm at an area scale of 1 mm×1 mm; and

a mean surface skewness Ssk value of from −0.9 to +0.9 at an area scale of 90 μm×90 μm;

wherein textured surface comprises silicone.

17. The breast implant of claim 16 , wherein the textured surface has a mean excess kurtosis value (Sku minus 3) of −1.5 to +1.5 at an area scale of 10 μm×10 μm.

18. The breast implant of claim 16 , wherein the textured surface has a mean excess kurtosis value (Sku minus 3) of to +1.5 at an area scale of 90 μm×90 μm.

19. The breast implant of claim 16 , wherein the textured surface has a mean surface roughness Sa value of from 0.1 μm to 5 μm at an area scale of 90 μm×90 μm.

20. A method of manufacturing the breast implant of claim 16 , the method comprising preparing the textured surface by molding a silicone material over a template having a negative of the textured surface.

Assignments (5)
CORRECTIVE ASSIGNMENT TO CORRECT THE THE SPELLING OF MANCHESTER PREVIOUSLY RECORDED AT REEL: 061974 FRAME: 0790. ASSIGNOR(S) HEREBY CONFIRMS THE ASSIGNMENT. Recorded Dec 13, 2022
From: BAYAT, ARDESHIR; HILL, ERNEST; KYLE, DANIEL; OIKONOMOU, ANTONIOS
To: UNIVERSITY OF MANCHESTER
Reel/Frame 062116/0255 →
CORRECTIVE ASSIGNMENT TO CORRECT THE THE SPELLING ON THE SECOND WORD IN THE CONVEYING PARTY NAME PREVIOUSLY RECORDED AT REEL: 061843 FRAME: 0046. ASSIGNOR(S) HEREBY CONFIRMS THE ASSIGNMENT. Recorded Dec 13, 2022
From: UNIVERSITY OF MANCHESTER
To: ESTABLISHMENT LABS S.A.
Reel/Frame 062116/0281 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Nov 21, 2022
From: UNIVERSITY OF MANCHSTER
To: ESTABLISHMENT LABS S.A.
Reel/Frame 061843/0046 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Nov 21, 2022
From: BAYAT, ARDESHIR; HILL, ERNEST; KYLE, DANIEL; OIKONOMOU, ANTONIOS
To: UNIVERSITY OF MANCHSTER
Reel/Frame 061974/0790 →
SECURITY INTEREST Recorded Apr 29, 2022
From: ESTABLISHMENT LABS SOCIEDAD ANONIMA; JAMM TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
To: OAKTREE FUND ADMINISTRATION, LLC
Reel/Frame 059823/0935 →