Method and apparatus for assigning an allocated workload in a data center having multiple storage systems
A method and apparatus for assigning an allocated workload in a data center having multiple storage systems includes selecting one or more storage systems to be assigned the allocated workload based on a combination of performance impact scores and deployment scores. By considering both performance impact and deployment effort, the allocated workload is able to be assigned with a view not only toward storage system performance, but also with a view toward how deployment on a particular storage system would comply with data center policies and the amount of configuration effort it would take to enable the workload to be implemented on the target storage system. This enables workloads to be allocated within the data center while minimizing the required amount of configuration or reconfiguration required to implement the workload allocation within the data center.
1. A non-transitory tangible computer readable storage medium having stored thereon a computer program for assigning an allocated workload to a storage system in a data center having multiple storage systems, the computer program including a set of instructions which, when executed by a computer, cause the computer to perform a method comprising the steps of:
characterizing the allocated workload;
determining a target subset of storage systems from the multiple storage systems;
for each storage system of the target subset of storage systems, determining a performance impact score by simulating addition of the allocated workload to the storage system;
for each storage system of the target subset of storage systems, determining a deployment score by assessing an amount of storage system configuration required to implement the allocated workload on the storage system;
creating a first ranking of the storage systems of the target subset according to performance impact scores;
creating a second ranking of the storage systems of the target subset according to deployment scores;
creating an overall ranking of the storage systems of the target subset by combining the first ranking and second ranking; and
assigning the allocated workload to the storage system having the highest overall ranking.
2. The non-transitory tangible computer readable storage medium of claim 1 , wherein determining the performance impact scores for the target storage systems comprises performing a storage tier placement for the allocated workload on each target storage system.
3. The non-transitory tangible computer readable storage medium of claim 2 , further comprising increasing the storage system's performance impact score if the step of performing storage tier placement results in placement of the workload in a highest performance storage tier for the storage system.
4. The non-transitory tangible computer readable storage medium of claim 2 , wherein the step of assigning the allocated workload to the storage system having the highest overall ranking comprises assigning the allocated workload to a determined storage tier on the storage system having the highest overall ranking according to a result of the step of performing storage tier placement for the allocated workload.
5. The non-transitory tangible computer readable storage medium of claim 1 , wherein determining the performance impact score comprises simulating the allocated workload on a set of components of the storage system, determining a simulated usage level of the component, comparing the simulated usage level to a threshold usage level for the component, and assigning a component impact score to the component based on the comparison between the simulated usage level and the threshold usage level.
6. The non-transitory tangible computer readable storage medium of claim 1 , wherein determining the deployment score comprises performing port assignment for the allocated workload on the storage system, determining initiator compliance, and determining a set of directors on the storage system for the allocated workload.
7. The non-transitory tangible computer readable storage medium of claim 6 , wherein determining the deployment score further comprises comparing sets of components selected to implement the allocated workload with redundancy policies.
8. The non-transitory tangible computer readable storage medium of claim 6 , wherein determining the deployment score further comprises determining an amount of effort required to implement the allocated workload on the selected sets of components.
9. The non-transitory tangible computer readable storage medium of claim 8 , wherein determining the amount of effort required to implement the allocated workload on the selected sets of components comprises determining an amount of zoning changes required to implement the allocated workload on the selected sets of components.
10. The non-transitory tangible computer readable storage medium of claim 8 , wherein determining the amount of effort required to implement the allocated workload on the selected sets of components comprises determining whether an initiator group will need to be created to implement the allocated workload on the selected sets of components and determining if implementing the workload on the selected sets of components would violate zoning associated with one or more existing initiator groups.
11. A method of assigning an allocated workload to a storage system in a data center having multiple storage systems, comprising the steps of:
characterizing the allocated workload;
determining a target subset of storage systems from the multiple storage systems;
for each storage system of the target subset of storage systems, determining a performance impact score by simulating addition of the allocated workload to the storage system;
for each storage system of the target subset of storage systems, determining a deployment score by assessing an amount of storage system configuration required to implement the allocated workload on the storage system;
creating a first ranking of the storage systems of the target subset according to performance impact scores;
creating a second ranking of the storage systems of the target subset according to deployment scores;
creating an overall ranking of the storage systems of the target subset by combining the first ranking and second ranking; and
assigning the allocated workload to the storage system having the highest overall ranking.
12. The method of claim 11 , wherein determining the performance impact scores for the target storage systems comprises performing a storage tier placement for the allocated workload on each target storage system.
13. The method of claim 12 , further comprising increasing the storage system's performance impact score if the step of performing storage tier placement results in placement of the workload in a highest performance storage tier for the storage system.
14. The method of claim 12 , wherein the step of assigning the allocated workload to the storage system having the highest overall ranking comprises assigning the allocated workload to a determined storage tier on the storage system having the highest overall ranking according to a result of the step of performing storage tier placement for the allocated workload.
15. The method of claim 11 , wherein determining the performance impact score comprises simulating the allocated workload on a set of components of the storage system, determining a simulated usage level of the component, comparing the simulated usage level to a threshold usage level for the component, and assigning a component impact score to the component based on the comparison between the simulated usage level and the threshold usage level.
16. The method of claim 11 , wherein determining the deployment score comprises performing port assignment for the allocated workload on the storage system, determining initiator compliance, and determining a set of directors on the storage system for the allocated workload.
17. The method of claim 16 , wherein determining the deployment score further comprises comparing sets of components selected to implement the allocated workload with redundancy policies.
18. The method of claim 16 , wherein determining the deployment score further comprises determining an amount of effort required to implement the allocated workload on the selected sets of components.
19. The method of claim 18 , wherein determining the amount of effort required to implement the allocated workload on the selected sets of components comprises determining an amount of zoning changes required to implement the allocated workload on the selected sets of components.
20. The method of claim 18 , wherein determining the amount of effort required to implement the allocated workload on the selected sets of components comprises determining whether an initiator group will need to be created to implement the allocated workload on the selected sets of components and determining if implementing the workload on the selected sets of components would violate zoning associated with one or more existing initiator groups.