IP Library Granted Patent US 11,181,930
Granted Patent B1
US 11,181,930 · App. 16/790,100 · Granted Nov 23, 2021

Method and system for enhancing the functionality of a vehicle

Inventors: Blake Konrardy (San Francisco, CA); Scott T. Christensen (Salem, OR); Gregory Hayward (Bloomington, IL); Scott Farris (Bloomington, IL)
Assignee: STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY
G05D1/0293B60P3/12G05D1/0214G05D1/0295G08G1/161G05D2201/0213
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 11,181,930
App. No.
16/790,100
Granted
Nov 23, 2021
Kind
B1
Abstract

Methods and systems for enhancing the functionality of a semi-autonomous vehicle are described herein. The semi-autonomous vehicle may receive a communication from a fully autonomous vehicle within a threshold distance of the semi-autonomous vehicle. If the vehicles are travelling on the same route or the same portion of a route, the semi-autonomous vehicle may navigate to a location behind the fully autonomous vehicle. Then the semi-autonomous vehicle may operate autonomously by replicating one or more functions performed by the fully autonomous vehicle. The functions and/or maneuvers performed by the fully autonomous vehicle may be detected via sensors in the semi-autonomous vehicle and/or may be identified by communicating with the fully autonomous vehicle to receive indications of upcoming maneuvers. In this manner, the semi-autonomous vehicle may act as a fully autonomous vehicle.

Claims (42)

1. A computer-implemented method for enhancing the functionality of a vehicle, comprising:

broadcasting, via one or more processors and/or associated transceivers of a semiautonomous vehicle having one or more autonomous operation features, a request to follow a fully autonomous vehicle within a predetermined communication range of the semi-autonomous vehicle via vehicle-to-vehicle wireless communication;

receiving, at the one or more processors and/or associated transceivers of the semiautonomous vehicle via vehicle-to-vehicle communication, an indication directly from several autonomous vehicles that each autonomous vehicle is within the predetermined communication range of the semi-autonomous vehicle, wherein each indication includes identification information for the autonomous vehicle for determining a safety rating of the autonomous vehicle;

selecting, at the one or more processors of the semi-autonomous vehicle, an autonomous vehicle from among the several autonomous vehicles within the predetermined communication range of the semi-autonomous vehicle-based upon the safety rating of each of the several autonomous vehicles as determined according to the identification information for each autonomous vehicle; and

for a portion of the route, causing, by the one or more processors, the semi-autonomous vehicle to follow the selected autonomous vehicle and mimic each maneuver performed by the autonomous vehicle.

2. The computer-implemented method of claim 1 , wherein the one or more processors periodically re-verify that the semi-autonomous vehicle remains within a predetermined distance of the selected autonomous vehicle, and when a distance between the vehicles exceeds the predetermined threshold distance, the semi-autonomous vehicle maneuvers to the side of the road and parks.

3. The computer-implemented method of claim 1 , wherein at least one component in the semi-autonomous vehicle is malfunctioning, such that the semi-autonomous vehicle requires input from a vehicle operator to operate.

4. The computer-implemented method of claim 3 , wherein the semi-autonomous vehicle is damaged in a vehicle collision and the selected autonomous vehicle is a tow service vehicle.

5. The computer-implemented method of claim 1 , wherein the semi-autonomous vehicle includes fewer sensors for autonomous operation than the selected autonomous vehicle.

6. The computer-implemented method of claim 1 , wherein causing the semi-autonomous vehicle to mimic each maneuver performed by the selected autonomous vehicle includes:

receiving, at the one or more processors, an indication of an upcoming maneuver to be performed by the selected autonomous vehicle and an indication of a time or location at which the upcoming maneuver will be performed; and

causing, by the one or more processors, the semi-autonomous vehicle to perform the upcoming maneuver at the indicated time or location.

7. The computer-implemented method of claim 6 , further comprising:

receiving, at the one or more processors, an indication of a speed at which the selected autonomous vehicle is travelling; and

causing, by the one or more processors, the semi-autonomous vehicle to travel slower than the selected autonomous vehicle based upon the received speed.

8. The computer-implemented method of claim 1 , wherein causing the semi-autonomous vehicle to mimic each maneuver performed by the selected autonomous vehicle includes:

detecting, via one or more sensors within the semi-autonomous vehicle, a maneuver performed by the selected autonomous vehicle; and

causing, by the one or more processors, the semi-autonomous vehicle to perform a same maneuver as the detected maneuver.

9. The computer-implemented method of claim 1 , wherein a vehicle operator for the semi-autonomous vehicle provides input to the semi-autonomous vehicle to direct the semi-autonomous vehicle to a location behind the autonomous vehicle; and

when the semi-autonomous vehicle detects the selected autonomous vehicle in front of the semi-autonomous vehicle, the method further includes causing, by the one or more processors, the semi-autonomous vehicle to operate without input from a vehicle operator.

10. The computer-implemented method of claim 1 , wherein selecting, at the one or more processors of the semi-autonomous vehicle, an autonomous vehicle from among the several autonomous vehicles within the predetermined communication range of the semi-autonomous vehicle is based upon a comparison of the current route of the semi-autonomous vehicle with each of the several autonomous vehicles' route, respectively.

11. A computer system configured to enhance the functionality of a vehicle, the computer system comprising one or more local or remote processors, transceivers, and/or sensors configured to:

broadcast, via a semi-autonomous vehicle having one or more autonomous operation features, a request to follow a fully autonomous vehicle within a predetermined communication range of the semi-autonomous vehicle via vehicle-to-vehicle wireless communication;

receive, at the semi-autonomous vehicle via vehicle-to-vehicle communication, an indication directly from several fully autonomous or fully operational autonomous vehicles that each fully autonomous or fully operational autonomous vehicle is within the predetermined communication range of the semi-autonomous vehicle, wherein each indication includes identification information for the autonomous vehicle for determining a safety rating of the autonomous vehicle;

select, at the semi-autonomous vehicle, an autonomous vehicle from among the several autonomous vehicles within the predetermined communication range of the semiautonomous vehicle based upon the safety rating of each of the several autonomous vehicles as determined according to the identification information for each autonomous vehicle; and

for a portion of the route, cause the semi-autonomous vehicle to follow the selected autonomous vehicle and mimic each maneuver performed by the selected autonomous vehicle.

12. The computer system of claim 11 , wherein the semiautonomous vehicle periodically re-verifies that the semi-autonomous vehicle remains within a predetermined distance of the selected autonomous vehicle, and when a distance between the vehicles exceeds the predetermined threshold distance, the semi-autonomous vehicle maneuvers to the side of the road and parks.

13. The computer system of claim 11 , wherein at least one component in the semi-autonomous vehicle is malfunctioning, such that the semi-autonomous vehicle requires input from a vehicle operator to operate.

14. The computer system of claim 13 , wherein the semiautonomous vehicle is damaged in a vehicle collision and the selected autonomous vehicle is a tow service vehicle.

15. The computer system of claim 11 , wherein the semiautonomous vehicle includes fewer sensors for autonomous operation than the selected autonomous vehicle.

16. The computer system of claim 11 , wherein to cause the semi-autonomous vehicle to mimic each maneuver performed by the selected autonomous vehicle, the one or more local or remote processors, transceivers, and/or sensors are configured to:

receive an indication of an upcoming maneuver to be performed by the selected autonomous vehicle and an indication of a time or location at which the upcoming maneuver will be performed; and

cause the semi-autonomous vehicle to perform the upcoming maneuver at the indicated time or location.

17. The computer system of claim 16 , wherein one or more local or remote processors, transceivers, and/or sensors are further configured to:

receive an indication of a speed at which the selected autonomous vehicle is travelling; and

cause the semi-autonomous vehicle to travel slower than the selected autonomous vehicle based upon the received speed.

18. The computer system of claim 11 , wherein to cause the semi-autonomous vehicle to mimic each maneuver performed by the selected autonomous vehicle, the one or more local or remote processors, transceivers, and/or sensors are configured to:

detect, via one or more sensors within the semi-autonomous vehicle, a maneuver performed by the selected autonomous vehicle; and

cause the semi-autonomous vehicle to perform a same maneuver as the detected maneuver.

19. The computer system of claim 11 , wherein a vehicle operator for the semi-autonomous vehicle provides input to the semi-autonomous vehicle to direct the semi-autonomous vehicle to a location behind the selected autonomous vehicle; and

when the semi-autonomous vehicle detects the selected autonomous vehicle in front of the semi-autonomous vehicle, the one or more local or remote processors, transceivers, and/or sensors are configured to cause the semi-autonomous vehicle to operate without input from a vehicle operator.

20. The computer system of claim 11 , wherein selecting at the semi-autonomous vehicle, an autonomous vehicle from among the several autonomous vehicles within the predetermined communication range of the semiautonomous vehicle is based upon a comparison of the current route of the semi-autonomous vehicle with each of the several autonomous vehicles' route, respectively.

Assignments (1)
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Feb 13, 2020
From: KONRARDY, BLAKE; CHRISTENSEN, SCOTT T.; HAYWARD, GREGORY; FARRIS, SCOTT
To: STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY
Reel/Frame 051813/0729 →
Continuity (36)
Continuation 15409136 · Jan 18, 2017
Provisional Application 62434370 · Dec 14, 2016
Provisional Application 62434368 · Dec 14, 2016
Provisional Application 62434361 · Dec 14, 2016
Provisional Application 62434355 · Dec 14, 2016
Provisional Application 62434365 · Dec 14, 2016
Provisional Application 62434359 · Dec 14, 2016
Provisional Application 62430215 · Dec 5, 2016
Provisional Application 62428843 · Dec 1, 2016
Provisional Application 62424078 · Nov 18, 2016
Provisional Application 62424093 · Nov 18, 2016
Provisional Application 62418999 · Nov 8, 2016
Provisional Application 62419002 · Nov 8, 2016
Provisional Application 62419017 · Nov 8, 2016
Provisional Application 62419009 · Nov 8, 2016
Provisional Application 62419023 · Nov 8, 2016
Provisional Application 62418988 · Nov 8, 2016
Provisional Application 62415672 · Nov 1, 2016
Provisional Application 62415678 · Nov 1, 2016
Provisional Application 62415673 · Nov 1, 2016
Provisional Application 62415668 · Nov 1, 2016
Provisional Application 62406611 · Oct 11, 2016
Provisional Application 62406605 · Oct 11, 2016
Provisional Application 62406595 · Oct 11, 2016
Provisional Application 62406600 · Oct 11, 2016
Provisional Application 62381848 · Aug 31, 2016
Provisional Application 62380686 · Aug 29, 2016
Provisional Application 62376044 · Aug 17, 2016
Provisional Application 62373084 · Aug 10, 2016
Provisional Application 62351559 · Jun 17, 2016
Provisional Application 62349884 · Jun 14, 2016
Provisional Application 62312109 · Mar 23, 2016
Provisional Application 62303500 · Mar 4, 2016
Provisional Application 62302990 · Mar 3, 2016
Provisional Application 62287659 · Jan 27, 2016
Provisional Application 62286017 · Jan 22, 2016
Cited By (3)
US 12,284,087 US 12,309,039 US 12,417,086