Operation-security system for an automated vehicle
An operation-security system for an automated vehicle includes an object-detector and a controller. The object-detector includes at least three sensors. Each sensor is one of a camera used to determine an image-location of an object proximate to a host-vehicle, a lidar-unit used to determine a lidar-location of the object proximate to the host-vehicle, and a radar-unit used to determine a radar-location of the object proximate to the host-vehicle. The controller is in communication with the at least three sensors. The controller is configured to determine a composite-location based on a comparison of locations indicated by the at least three sensors. Information from one sensor is ignored when a respective location indicated by the one sensor differs from the composite-location by greater than an error-threshold. If a remote sensor not on the host-vehicle is used, V2V or V2I communications may be used to communicate a location to the host-vehicle.
1. An operation-security system for a vehicle, said system comprising:
an object-detector used to determine a first-location of an object proximate to a host-vehicle at a first-time, and a second-location of the object at a second-time characterized as a sampling-interval after the first-time; and
a controller in communication with the object-detector, said controller configured to:
determine a motion-vector of the host-vehicle, estimate an expected-location of the object at the second-time based on the motion-vector, the first-location, and the sampling-interval, wherein information from the object-detector at the second-time is ignored when the expected-location differs from the second-location by greater than an error-threshold; and
determine an object-vector based on a prior-difference between the first-location and a prior-location of the object proximate to the host-vehicle at a prior-time prior to the first-time, wherein the expected-location is also determined based on the object-vector.
2. The system of claim 1 , wherein the motion-vector is based on a yaw rate of the host-vehicle.
3. The system of claim 1 , wherein the object-detector comprises at least three sensors including:
a camera used to determine an imager-location of the object proximate to the host-vehicle;
a lidar-unit used to determine a lidar-location of the object proximate to the host-vehicle; and
a radar-unit used to determine a radar-location of the object proximate to the host-vehicle.
4. The system of claim 3 , wherein the first-location is based on at least one of an average range from the vehicle to the imager-location, the radar-location, and the lidar-location, an average azimuth angle from the vehicle to the imager-location, the radar-location, and the lidar-location, an average latitude of the imager-location, the radar-location, and the lidar-location, or an average longitude of the imager-location, the radar-location, and the lidar-location.
5. The system of claim 3 , wherein at least one of the at least three sensors comprises at least one remote sensor not mounted on or within the vehicle.
6. The system of claim 5 , comprising a transceiver configured to receive at least one of the imager-location, the radar-location, or the lidar-location from the at least one remote sensor.
7. The system of claim 1 , wherein said controller is further configured to:
monitor location information during operation of the host-vehicle, including looking for sudden, unusual, or unexpected changes in the motion-vector, the object-vector, and the expected-location over time; and
determine, using the monitored location information, that the system has been hacked.
8. The system of claim 7 , wherein said controller is further configured to:
in response to determining that the system has been hacked, take action to avoid erratic operation of the host-vehicle.
9. A computer-implemented method, comprising:
determining, using an object-detector, a first-location of an object proximate to a host-vehicle at a first-time, and a second-location of the object at a second-time characterized as a sampling-interval after the first-time; and
determining, using a controller, a motion-vector of the host-vehicle;
estimating, using the controller, an expected-location of the object at the second-time based on the motion-vector, the first-location, and the sampling-interval, wherein information from the object-detector at the second-time is ignored when the expected-location differs from the second-location by greater than an error-threshold; and
determining, using the controller, an object-vector based on a prior-difference between the first-location and a prior-location of the object proximate to the host-vehicle at a prior-time prior to the first-time, wherein the expected-location is also determined based on the object-vector.
10. The method of claim 9 , wherein the motion-vector is based on a yaw rate of the host-vehicle.
11. The method of claim 9 , wherein the object-detector comprises at least three sensors including:
a camera used to determine an imager-location of the object proximate to the host-vehicle;
a lidar-unit used to determine a lidar-location of the object proximate to the host-vehicle; and
a radar-unit used to determine a radar-location of the object proximate to the host-vehicle.
12. The method of claim 11 , wherein the first-location is based on at least one of an average range from the vehicle to the imager-location, the radar-location, and the lidar-location, an average azimuth angle from the vehicle to the imager-location, the radar-location, and the lidar-location, an average latitude of the imager-location, the radar-location, and the lidar-location, or an average longitude of the imager-location, the radar-location, and the lidar-location.
13. The method of claim 11 , wherein at least one of the at least three sensors comprises at least one remote sensor not mounted on or within the vehicle.
14. The method of claim 9 , comprising:
monitoring location information during operation of the host-vehicle, including looking for sudden, unusual, or unexpected changes in the motion-vector, the object-vector, and the expected-location over time; and
determining, using the monitored location information, that a system of the host-vehicle has been hacked.
15. The method of claim 14 , comprising:
in response to determining that the system of the host-vehicle has been hacked, taking action to avoid erratic operation of the host-vehicle.
16. At least one non-transitory computer-readable medium storing instructions which, when executed by at least one processor, cause the at least one processor to perform operations comprising:
determining, using an object-detector, a first-location of an object proximate to a host-vehicle at a first-time, and a second-location of the object at a second-time characterized as a sampling-interval after the first-time; and
determining, using a controller, a motion-vector of the host-vehicle;
estimating, using the controller, an expected-location of the object at the second-time based on the motion-vector, the first-location, and the sampling-interval, wherein information from the object-detector at the second-time is ignored when the expected-location differs from the second-location by greater than an error-threshold; and
determining, using the controller, an object-vector based on a prior-difference between the first-location and a prior-location of the object proximate to the host-vehicle at a prior-time prior to the first-time, wherein the expected-location is also determined based on the object-vector.
17. The at least one non-transitory computer-readable medium of claim 16 , wherein the object-detector comprises at least three sensors including:
a camera used to determine an imager-location of the object proximate to the host-vehicle;
a lidar-unit used to determine a lidar-location of the object proximate to the host-vehicle; and
a radar-unit used to determine a radar-location of the object proximate to the host-vehicle.
18. The at least one non-transitory computer-readable medium of claim 17 , wherein at least one of the at least three sensors comprises at least one remote sensor not mounted on or within the vehicle.
19. The at least one non-transitory computer-readable medium of claim 16 storing instructions which, when executed by the at least one processor, cause the at least one processor to perform operations comprising:
monitoring location information during operation of the host-vehicle, including looking for sudden, unusual, or unexpected changes in the motion-vector, the object-vector, and the expected-location over time; and
determining, using the monitored location information, that a system of the host-vehicle has been hacked.
20. The at least one non-transitory computer-readable medium of claim 16 storing instructions which, when executed by the at least one processor, cause the at least one processor to perform operations comprising:
in response to determining that the system of the host-vehicle has been hacked, taking action to avoid erratic operation of the host-vehicle.