IP Library Granted Patent US 10,896,807
Granted Patent B2
US 10,896,807 · App. 16/803,020 · Granted Jan 19, 2021

Synchronization between an excitation source and a substrate bias supply

Inventors: Kevin Fairbairn (Los Gatos, CA); Denis Shaw (Fort Collins, TX); Daniel Carter (Fort Collins, CO)
Assignee: Advanced Energy Industries, Inc.
H01J37/32146C23C14/48H01J37/3299H01J37/32174H01J37/32935
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 10,896,807
App. No.
16/803,020
Granted
Jan 19, 2021
Kind
B2
Abstract

Systems and methods for plasma processing are disclosed. A method includes applying pulsed power to a plasma processing chamber with an excitation source during a first processing step with a first duty cycle and applying, during the first processing step, an asymmetric periodic voltage waveform to a substrate support to produce a first plasma sheath voltage between a substrate and a plasma. Pulsed power is applied to the plasma processing chamber with the excitation source during a second processing step with a second duty cycle and during the second processing step, a different asymmetric periodic voltage waveform is applied to the substrate support to produce a different plasma sheath voltage between the substrate and the plasma.

Claims (29)

1. A method for plasma processing, the method comprising:

applying pulsed power to a plasma processing chamber with an excitation source during a first processing step with a first duty cycle;

applying, during the first processing step, an asymmetric periodic voltage waveform with a bias supply to a substrate support to produce a first plasma sheath voltage between a substrate and a plasma;

applying pulsed power to the plasma processing chamber with the excitation source during a second processing step with a second duty cycle, wherein the second processing step follows the first processing step and the second duty cycle is different than the first duty cycle; and

applying, during the second processing step, a different asymmetric periodic voltage waveform with the bias supply to the substrate support to produce a different plasma sheath voltage between the substrate and the plasma.

2. The method of claim 1 , wherein the first duty cycle is longer than the second duty cycle and a magnitude of the sheath voltage during the second processing step is less than the magnitude of the sheath voltage during the first processing step.

3. The method of claim 1 , wherein a voltage of the pulsed power during the second processing step is lower than a voltage of the pulsed power during the first processing step.

4. The method of claim 1 , wherein generating the different plasma sheath voltages during one, or both, of the processing steps includes generating a range of sheath voltages.

5. The method of claim 4 , wherein generating the range of sheath voltages includes providing current to a support for the substrate that is at least one of greater than or less than ion current of ions impacting a surface of the substrate.

6. A plasma processing system, the system comprising:

a bias supply configured to apply and modify an asymmetric periodic voltage waveform to a substrate support to modify a plasma sheath voltage between the plasma and a substrate within a plasma processing chamber; and

at least one controller configured to:

synchronize the bias supply with an excitation source during a first processing step to produce a plasma sheath voltage while the excitation source is producing pulsed power with a first duty cycle; and

synchronize the bias supply with the excitation source during a second processing step while the excitation source is producing pulsed power with a second duty cycle and apply the asymmetric periodic voltage waveform to produce a different magnitude of the plasma sheath voltage during the second processing step.

7. The plasma processing system of claim 6 , wherein the at least one controller is configured to:

control the excitation source so the first duty cycle is longer than the second duty cycle; and

control the bias supply so the magnitude of the plasma sheath voltage during the second processing step is less than the magnitude of the plasma sheath voltage during the first processing step.

8. The plasma processing system of claim 6 , wherein the at least one controller is configured to control the bias supply to produce a range of plasma sheath voltages during one of, or both of, the first and second processing steps.

9. The plasma processing system of claim 8 , wherein the at least one controller is configured to control the bias supply to provide current to a support for the substrate that is at least one of greater than or less than an ion-current of ions impacting a surface of the substrate to produce the range of plasma sheath voltages.

10. The plasma processing system of claim 6 , wherein the at least one controller includes at least one of a processor or a field programmable gate array, and wherein the at least one controller includes a non-transitory computer-readable medium comprising instructions stored thereon, for execution by the processor, or for configuring the field programmable gate array, to control the bias supply.

11. A non-transitory computer-readable medium comprising instructions stored thereon, for execution by a processor, or for configuring a field programmable gate array, to perform plasma processing, the instructions including instructions to:

apply pulsed power to a plasma processing chamber with an excitation source during a first processing step with a first duty cycle;

apply, during the first processing step, an asymmetric periodic voltage waveform to a substrate support to produce a first plasma sheath voltage between a substrate and a plasma;

apply pulsed power to the plasma processing chamber with the excitation source during a second processing step with a second duty cycle, wherein the second processing step follows the first processing step; and

apply, during the second processing step, a different asymmetric periodic voltage waveform to the substrate support to produce a different plasma sheath voltage between the substrate and the plasma.

12. The non-transitory computer-readable medium of claim 11 , wherein the first duty cycle is longer than the second duty cycle and a magnitude of the sheath voltage during the second processing step is less than the magnitude of the sheath voltage during the first processing step.

13. The non-transitory computer-readable medium of claim 11 , wherein a voltage of the pulsed power during the second processing step is lower than a voltage of the pulsed power during the first processing step.

14. The non-transitory computer-readable medium of claim 11 , wherein generating the different plasma sheath voltages during one, or both, of the processing steps includes generating a range of sheath voltages.

15. The non-transitory computer-readable medium of claim 14 , wherein generating the range of sheath voltages includes providing current to a support for the substrate that is at least one of greater than or less than ion current of ions impacting a surface of the substrate.

Assignments (1)
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Mar 17, 2020
From: FAIRBAIRN, KEVIN; SHAW, DENIS; CARTER, DANIEL
To: ADVANCED ENERGY INDUSTRIES, INC.
Reel/Frame 052183/0617 →
Continuity (3)
Continuation 16193790 · Nov 16, 2018
Provisional Application 62588187 · Nov 17, 2017
Related Publication 20200203128A1 · Jun 25, 2020
Cited By (19)
US 12,198,966 US 12,230,476 US 12,237,148 US 12,261,019 US 12,272,524 US 12,315,732 US 12,347,647 US 12,368,020 US 12,394,596 US 12,482,633 US 12,505,986 US 12,525,433 US 12,525,441 US 12,567,572 US 12,573,591 US 12,586,768 US 12,663,456 US 12,683,123 US 12,706,275